Dr. SHIVA’s Lawsuit To Show Government MADE Twitter Silence Political Speech

By Staff

A government private company relationship to marginalize and de platform individuals over first amendment speech is Fascism. These are the playbooks developed by Twitter to suppress opposing views to the state narrative:

All these referenced documents with links to their content are available here: https://vashiva.com/first-amendment-twitter-galvin-lawsuit/

From Dr Shiva's court filing at: Case 1:20-cv-11889-MLW Document 118 Filed 05/21/21 Page 1 of 7

Plaintiff has independently discovered the documentary evidence proving that Tassinari, Cohen, NASED and Twitter Legal jointly collaborated to design and build the core infrastructure, processes, and protocols enabling the Twitter Trusted Partnership Program and the Twitter Partner Support Portal (PSP).

In2017,Cohen and others began formulating and designing the framework for silently violating the free speech rights of US persons by first characterizing speakers as “Influence Operators” (IOs) thereby fabricating a sinister connotation where none exists, as the ideological frame work to justify canceling speakers who exercise their right to express their opinion.

All of these finally culminated in 2020 in the final manual for state officials called the Elections Influence Operations Playbook for State and Local Officials, for which Cohen and Twitter Legal are architects.This manual is split into three parts. The first two parts are available to the public.The third part is available only to state and local officials. Part1 provides the theoretical foundation for identifying and targeting “Influence Operators,”i.e. persons who accuse state election officials of corruption or make allegations that state elections may have violated Federal law.

When ever government enlists and dictates user behaviors that are NOT desired or dictates policies to view point discriminate is known as fascism.

In 2018, Amy Cohen, as Executive Director for NASED, testified to Congress about this emerging framework that she helped to formulate and architect in 2017, in cooperation with state officials and that they created a new centralized Governing Coordinating Council (GCC) that brought together both state and federal officials to create an electronic infrastructure for surveying speech and monitoring“ Influence Operators.”

So there we have an admission by the director of NASED that the avowed purpose of this 'energing framework' is to control free speech by de-platforming those defined as 'influence' operators.

"Bruce Lund, a senior member of In-Q-Tel’s technical staff, noted in a 2012 paper that “monitoring social media” is increasingly essential for government agencies seeking to keep track of “erupting political movements, crises, epidemics, and disasters, not to mention general global trends.” This statement necessarily infers that "erupting political movements" includes speech that opposes  government narratives.

The article continues:  “When you have private companies deciding which algorithms get you a so-called threat score, or make you a person of interest, there’s obviously room for targeting people based on viewpoints or even unlawfully targeting people based on race or religion,” said Lee Rowland, a senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union.

This is exactly what is happening with Twitter's de platforming of views that conflict with government political agenda narratives.












Attention Trump Campaign: Green Party Candidate Jill Stein Won Groundbreaking Case in October — Gives Campaign Right to Examine Voting Machine Source Code

By Jim Hoft


Let’s hope this makes it to the Trump Campaign.

On October 30, 2020 2016 Green Party Candidate Jill Stein FINALLY won her groundbreaking case that gave her campaign the right to examine voting machine source code in Wisconsin.

It took Jill Stein four years to win this court case.

After witnessing the historic level of fraud in this year’s election it makes us all question the numbers in past elections.

In 2016 Libertarian voters kept Donald Trump from adding New Hampshire, Minnesota and Maine to his electoral haul. Were those actual Libertarian votes in 2016 or were they switched from Trump to Gary Johnson to prevent him from winning those states?

Dr. Jill Stein celebrated this win with a string of tweets on October 30th.

The Trump campaign should take notice.

Confiscating the voting machines in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada may be crucial to exposing the fraud in this year’s election.

Related:  https://thenewamerican.com/fresh-lawsuits-give-proof-of-massive-vote-machine-fraud/

MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO!! WATCH NOW, VERY,VERY Interesting!!



---------- Forwarded Message ---------
Subject: Fwd: MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO!! WATCH NOW
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:30:25 -0600

Good morning to you ...
 
CONFIRMED DHS COUNTERMEASURES - most important video to look at, please lend support in anyway possible, pass it on to all that you know needs world wide access will be earth shattering

by Michael Walsh

Now that the media has declared Joe Biden the next president of the United States, let’s take a look at the state of play:

1. Donald Trump is legally the president until his term expires at noon on Jan. 20, 2021. Nothing that happened last week or will happen until Jan. 20 will affect his position or authority in any way.

2. Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. is neither the president nor the president-elect.

3. There is no such thing as the “office of the president-elect.” Barack Obama invented this phantom unconstitutional position back in 2008. It didn’t matter then and it doesn’t matter now, except in the minds of the media.

4. Biden will not be president-elect until the Electoral College meets on Dec. 14, if then. However …

5. Dec. 8 is the so-called “safe harbor” date, by which the states, under federal law, must have resolved any and all controversies regarding a disputed election, and their governors must so certify, in order for the names of the actual electors to be reported to the national archivist.

6. Neither state governors nor courts, including their high courts, have any authority over how federal elections are conducted in their states.

7. If the election results are still in doubt by Dec. 8—as they might well be—the Trump campaign could ask the state legislatures in the disputed battleground to set aside the tainted tallies and use their plenary powers under Article 1, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution to appoint and certify slates of electors favorable to the GOP.

MORE
 
 
Voting Patient number!
 


____________________________________________________________

Top News - Sponsored By Newser