Has the Penn Supreme Court Invited Scrutiny and Rebuke By Relying on "Laches" to Dismiss an Incovenient Complaint?

By Shipwreckedcrew


Late in the day on Saturday the Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed with prejudice the complaint filed by GOP Congressman Mike Kelly, failed GOP candidate Sean Parnell, and others, claiming that the “no excuse” mail-in ballot option created by the Pennsylvania legislature in 2019 violated Section 14 of Pennsylvania Constitution.  That Section limits “absentee” voting to four narrow categories of “absent electors”. The complaint alleged that because Section 14 is itself a constitutional limit on exceptions to in-person voting, the no-excuse mail-in voting statute worked as a de facto amendment to the Pennsylvania Constitution without going through the required  process for amending the Constitution.

Without addressing the merits of the complaint in any fashion, the Court ordered the case dismissed on the equitable grounds of “laches”, finding that the “facial” challenge to the constitutionality of Act 77, the law which created no-excuse mail-in balloting, was a matter the plaintiffs could have brought the time the Act was passed.  The Court found a lack of diligence from the fact that they did nothing for more than a year, during which time both a primary and general election took place in which “no-excuse” mail-in voting procedures were employed.

I’m going to make a point here, at the outset, that is somewhat out of place because I want the readers to keep it in mind as they read through the remainder of this article.

The Kelly complaint alleges that Act 77 changed the voting process in Pennsylvania in a manner that amended the Pennsylvania Constitution, without going through the process for making amendments to the Constitution as set forth therein.


The opponents of the Kelly complaint — joined by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in dismissing the complaint — are possessed by the issue of whether millions of Pennsylvania electors will be “disenfranchised if “no-excuse” absentee voting is declared to be invalid due to the complaint.

What I have not seen commented on — and that failure is why I put this issue here at the top — is that one of the approvals required in the process for amending the Pennsylvania Constitution is that proposed Amendments must receive a majority vote of Pennsylvania electors in a general election.

The voters of Pennsylvania were entitled to have a say in whether the Constitution’s provisions regarding elections and voting should be amended.  The General Assembly, Governor, Secretary of the Commonwealth, and County Boards of Election DISENFRANCHISED Pennsylania voters by imposing a “no-excuse” change to the “absentee ballot” provisions of the Constitution without first getting their approval.   

Attention Trump Campaign: Green Party Candidate Jill Stein Won Groundbreaking Case in October — Gives Campaign Right to Examine Voting Machine Source Code

By Jim Hoft


Let’s hope this makes it to the Trump Campaign.

On October 30, 2020 2016 Green Party Candidate Jill Stein FINALLY won her groundbreaking case that gave her campaign the right to examine voting machine source code in Wisconsin.

It took Jill Stein four years to win this court case.

After witnessing the historic level of fraud in this year’s election it makes us all question the numbers in past elections.

In 2016 Libertarian voters kept Donald Trump from adding New Hampshire, Minnesota and Maine to his electoral haul. Were those actual Libertarian votes in 2016 or were they switched from Trump to Gary Johnson to prevent him from winning those states?

Dr. Jill Stein celebrated this win with a string of tweets on October 30th.

The Trump campaign should take notice.

Confiscating the voting machines in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada may be crucial to exposing the fraud in this year’s election.

Related:  https://thenewamerican.com/fresh-lawsuits-give-proof-of-massive-vote-machine-fraud/

PayPal now terminating user accounts, stealing money from users that support free speech

by Ethan Huff


In case you were unaware, PayPal, the banking partner of eBay, has been locking down accounts, seizing funds and engaging in all sorts of other illicit behavior targeted specifically at customers deemed to be politically incorrect. And domain registration and hosting platform Epik says this goes right along with all the libel, slander, theft, tax evasion, money laundering, and weaponized harassment of customers that now demarcates PayPal’s routine business practices.

snip... snip

In a press release dated Oct. 31, Epik called for the resignation of Schulman, whom it says is guilty of a litany of crimes, including using PayPal as “a political targeting tool to cause suffering and hardship based on Schulman’s personal beliefs and private views.”

Schulman has admitted on more than one occasion that PayPal now hand-selects which customers to do business with, while everyone else gets blacklisted. Those with existing PayPal accounts that have been identified as political foes are also being targeted for abuse and fraud, which is only possible because PayPal maintains a monopoly on digital funds transfers.

Epik also names Mashable and Matt Binder as among the “originating sources” of the now more than 200 articles and media cases that were published by PayPal as hit pieces against Epik and other political foes. Another culprit complicit in this libel campaign is the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which needs to be “investigated and dismantled as a domestic terror organization.”


Fraud Uncovered during GA Recount

by Jack Davis


A report from a Republican monitoring the manual recount of the presidential election vote in Georgia said one of the counters was erroneously giving votes to Joe Biden that were cast for President Donald Trump.

Hale Soucie is a Republican National Committee monitor who’s watching the recount in Cobb County, according to Townhall.com. He was described by The New York Times in a Monday article as being with a group that was comprised of “concerned citizens of a conservative bent.”

RELATED:

STUFFING THE CURVE

The data below appears to “show a mathematically fraudulent result that is adding votes unnaturally to the tail of the [Montgomery County, PA] distribution.” In other words, the report alleges that additional ballots were added to counties that were expected to go for Biden “with the assumption the addition will not be noticed due to the already high Dem/Rep ratio.”For example, an “astonishing 16-point increase in the take of new votes favoring Biden” exists, requiring “not only a matched turnout of supporters to keep pace with Trump turnout at a higher required multiple,

 

Read more: http://patrioteponym.webnode.com/