JUST IN: Kari Lake’s Attorneys File New Brief & Petition to Transfer Election Case to AZ Supreme Court After Maricopa County BUSTED Falsely Certifying Voting Machines Past L&A Testing –...

by Allen Williams


JUST IN: Kari Lake’s Attorneys File New Brief & Petition to Transfer Election Case to AZ Supreme Court After Maricopa County BUSTED Falsely Certifying Voting Machines Past L&A Testing – 260/446 FAILED On AND BEFORE Election Day

 Looks like Kari Lake finally has Maricopa caught in their own lies. Lake needs to win this because  I suspect the same tactics will be used against Trump in 2024. I personally watched the fraud trial of Judge Peter Thompson with Elections Director Scott Jarrett perjuring himself. As the information gets out it becomes much more difficult to dismiss it away.

The Gateway Pundit has reported extensively on the evidence of illegalities presented in Kari Lake’s lawsuit. Newly discovered evidence shows that machine failures affecting tens if not hundreds of thousands of voters on election day were likely caused by intentional misconduct. Incorrect machine settings, printer settings, and ballot paper sizes utilized by Maricopa County caused machines at 60% of voting locations to fail on the day that Republicans turned out 3:1 to vote for Kari Lake and Republican candidates.

Lake’s Petition for Transfer and Reply Brief, both filed on Tuesday, urging the court once again to consider the “extraordinary new evidence presented in Lake’s motion for relief from judgment,” which was filed in May 2023.

Every one is urged to pray for Lake and repent of their trespasses against GOD; perhaps He will relent and spare us. Otherwise, America is lost as NO ONE will be able to gain office except for certain machine selected individuals. .Maricopa County not only violated multiple state laws but also the federal requirement to keep ballots for 22 months.

The County admits to “install[ing] new memory cards on its Election Day tabulators” on October 14, 17, and 18, after the statutorily required October 11 logic and accuracy (L&A) testing. Maricopa County further confirms that “elections officials ran a small number of sample ballots through each tabulator to ensure that the installation was properly performed.” This reconfiguration of the machines, which were later tested illegally, is also confirmed in Maricopa County Elections Director Scott Jarett’s declaration under oath: “Beginning on October 14 and occurring through October 18, Maricopa County installed the new memory cards that had the certified Election Program.”

"Still, the County admits to “install[ing] new memory cards on its Election Day tabulators” on October 14, 17, and 18, after the statutorily required October 11 logic and accuracy (L&A) testing. Maricopa County further confirms that “elections officials ran a small number of sample ballots through each tabulator to ensure that the installation was properly performed.” This reconfiguration of the machines, which were later tested illegally, is also confirmed in Maricopa County Elections Director Scott Jarett’s declaration under oath: “Beginning on October 14 and occurring through October 18, Maricopa County installed the new memory cards that had the certified Election Program.”

So we will see if the courts continue to ignore elected officials oaths along with the obvious breaking of federal and state laws which is most likely why the defense attorneys have petitioned to withdraw from the case.

 



Tina Peters sentenced to probation, much bigger case begins in October…

Tina Peters sentenced to probation, much bigger case begins in October…


The state of Colorado is 'inventing' crimes faster than the news media can keep up. This is an premier of what life will be like in the new world order with corrupt individuals in charge. In this new world non binary Sam Brinton won't be jailed for stealing a woman's suitcase because he wanted her outfits, Oh wait.. he wasn't anyway.

Jena Griswald is a harlequin and needs to convict Peters to keep her own butt out of jail because if we ever get rid of the machines, their political future is not worth a pile of dung. Dominion and the state of Colorado are after her because she exposed Dominion's  'Trusted machine Build' and these goons suppose that by threatening and treating her as a criminal, the public won't believe the voting machines are rigging elections. Well how stupid do you think we are?

This is the only way these cruds can win is to have a machine choose the low life's they want.They are doing the very same thing to Trump while the judges sit on their asses, take the payoffs, campaign contributions, charity donations, or whatever you want to call them and do nothing !

They value more the worthless currency they get for supporting one  world government and being a slave of the banking cartels.

UPDATE: Kari Lake Attorneys File Blistering Response to Maricopa County Filing – Why Were There Over 35,000 Unaccounted for Ballots in the Election – Where Did They Come From?

by Allen Williams


"Maricopa County filed a response to Kari Lake’s Petition for Review in the Arizona Supreme Court on Monday… The Gateway Pundit has reported extensively on Kari Lake’s stolen election and her lawsuit challenging the fraud in Maricopa County, Arizona. On March 1, 2023, after the Maricopa County Superior Court and the Arizona Appeals Court dismissed the case, Lake filed a ‘Petition for Review’ and a Motion to Expedite Review’ for her election contest in the Arizona Supreme Court."

This case is most likely to wind up at the U.S. Supreme Ct. The blatant corruption of the courts is the reason the case hasn’t advanced; certainly NOT for lack of evidence. Don’t be surprised if a lot of the various spending bills passed by Congress doesn’t include money for bribing judges in critical cases. If the globalists lose in the Kari Lake case, the whole corrupt ‘ball of wax’ goes with it and globalists are NOT going to let that happen.

Maricopa County filed a response to Kari Lake’s Petition for Review in the Arizona Supreme Court on Monday… Lake’s attorneys previously argued that according to Findley v. Sorenson (1929), even if not intentional, election errors can nullify an election if “they affect the result, or at least render it uncertain.” This is further confirmed by the opinion in Hunt v. Campbell (1917), which states, “wherever such practices or influences are shown to have prevailed, not slightly and in individual cases, but generally, so as to render the result uncertain, the entire vote so affected must be rejected.”

As I mentioned before, I sat and watched the trial conducted by Superior Court judge Peter Thompson while Elections director Scott Jarret perjured himself in the trial by contradicting his testimony the day before about the machines printing the wrong ballots on election day.  If this isn’t fraud then nothing can ever qualify and that’s the picture that Judge Thompson and his asine friends would like you to believe. Reading either of these laws .i.e. Findley v. Sorenson or Hunt v. Campbell one can readily see that making machine changes on election dayor causing ballots to be rejected by the machines is nothing other than FRAUD !

This is corruption at it’s highest level and it cannot be allowed to stand !


An Open Letter to Kim Hammer regarding Senate Bill 250 that Makes Counties Pay for their own Ballot Paper

by Allen Williams


An Open Letter to Arkansas Senator Kim Hammer:


I am writing you about Arkansas Senate Bill 250 which seeks to regulate paper for a proposed paper ballot election system.   https://www.fayettevilleflyer.com/2023/03/01/arkansas-senate-committee-advances-bill-to-regulate-paper-ballots/

First making the counties pay for their paper is draconian and an attempt to usurp the will of the people forcing them to use a voting method that is questionable at best and criminal at worst   I would further note that your legislation is particularly disturbing given the wealth of data suggesting rampant machine problems but the most disturbing report is from Dominion itself:

"In 2018 email cited by the defense in voting machine company’s defamation suit against Fox News, Dominion director of product strategy and security acknowledged the company’s technology was marred by a “*critical* bug leading to INCORRECT results.” You can read this report yourself at https://beforeitsnews.com/crime-all-stars/2023/02/key-dominion-exec-admitted-company-products-riddled-with-bugs-days-before-2020-vote-fox-lawyers-so-judges-are-deliberately-ignoring-the-machines-defects-2494799.html

Next there is the data presented by Computer scientist Alex Halderman revealing the many vulnerabilities of the machines which you can read for yourself here:  https://www.c-span.org/video/?463480-4/washington-journal-j-alex-halderman-discusses-election-security. Just for the record, it is naive at best to assume that none of the vulnerabilities determined by Halderman have not already been taken advantage of and at worst downright reckless to assume that machine selections are secure.

I saw a presentation of your objections on Lindell TV last night regarding the paper ballot election system.  I think it's clear that you have little to no understanding of machine driven elections which I hope I can clarify via some mathematical graphs as to why these devices are unacceptable.

I'll begin by presenting several election results charts by Dr. Douglas G Frank, a world-renowned physicist with sixty peer-reviewed scientific publications.  He has been working to illustrate how the voting machine algorithms manipulate voter data in essentially a 'black box' environment.  This series of plots was done by Dr. Frank, the first one is from Clement County and the second is Arkansas county during the 2020 election. 

The  first graph is Clement County, Arkansas.  Frank presents some six curves representing the voter response.  The Legend on the right describes the graph's colors and the data represented in each of the colors in the two graphs.

 The first thing to note is that the total registrations exceed the population of the county (grey line at top of the curve) and (grey curve) on the right side about halfway down.  The second area of concern is the turnout at 89.8 percent which is abnormally high across all age groups.  Notice the light colored blue line is a prediction of what the red-black curves would look like.  The most revealing statistic is Frank's prediction of the active registrations and ballots recorded (Light blue line) which is not only maintained throughout Clement county but is essentially identical (correlation factor = 0.998) throughout all Arkansas counties.  The correlation ratio measures how well Frank's estimation of the active registrations matches the votes recorded in each county which is indicative of machine manipulation as every registered voter doesn't always vote and certainly not at a 0.998 correlation.

The second graph analysis is from Arkansas County.  The machine didn't exceed the total population in this county but the same general pattern found in Clement county is repeated.  Again the extraordinary turnout of 91.2 percent of all age groups is highly improbable.  How many of these people are over 90 years old? The revealing mathematical predictor curve Dr. Frank shows estimates how well the active registrations (black line) matches the total ballots recorded (red line) with a correlation factor of 0.994. It is impossible for these two lines to have a high correlation basis in county after county which supports his premise of machine manipulation.  Once a ratio of Candidate -A to Candidate -B is determined, you can successfully predict the county 's winners.  It is impossible for a candidate to win by the same percentage margin in every county in the state.  This is indicative of fraud.
These graphs show Arkansas has more people on the voter roles than live in the state. Isn't that illegal? These kind of discrepancies allow machines to vote the voter database names which leads me to ask why isn't this a concern to you? Are you even aware of this possibility?

There is no reason to use electronic voting machines given the flaws that have been found in these and other analyses; it is simply a means to game elections.  It doesn't matter which vendor machine the state uses, ES&S, Hart or Dominion, they all work the same  and are all connected to the internet, if they weren't how else would the vote tabulations be reported?  There is no reason to use machines given the flaws that have been found in the machine  that disenfranchise Arkansas voters who don't want them

My conclusions are (1) that your Senate Bill 250 will unjustly keep the  Counties from using the election method of their choice so that a machine vs paper count results is not possible thereby preserving the black box secrecy.  (2) You have arbitrarily determined to punish counties voting for paper ballots because election integrity is not as important as the ability to fix an election. (3) There is some financial benefit either from the machine vendors or other independent sources that will reward you for forcing electronic voting.

 If this bill should become law it must immediately face a court challenge as the Senate cannot abrogate the election process by legislative fiat.