The Patriots

So now we find out that THERE ARE differences between men and women that can not be overcome just as the CREATOR designed it. This is a vital lesson in ignoring the many hare brains through out the medical profession.

(LifeSiteNews) — Earlier this week, The Daily Wire published a gut-wrenching editorial penned by Sophie Ottaway titled “Doctors Performed A Sex Change Operation On Me At Two-Days-Old. I Found Out Decades Later.” It is yet another cautionary tale detailing the folly of gender ideology and the suffering borne by its victims.

When Sophie was 22, Ottaway discovered something stunning during a “routine trip to the doctor’s office” – that Ottaway was born male. Two days after birth, doctors had decided to remove “my split penis and testes” and “directed my parents to raise me as a female,” ordering them to keep this fact from Sophie “under the guise of psychological protection.” Ottaway is now 37 and decided to pen the editorial to lay out “the journey I undertook to make peace with myself and my body.” 

And that’s when a switch flipped in my brain – enough was enough. Not only had surgeons conducted unnecessary gender reassignment surgeries on my childhood body – I’d spent a whole lifetime without a vagina only to land in hospital with sepsis caused by a failed fake vagina that I never knew existed.

If those birth surgeries were legitimately conducted to help me, then why would I be facing a critical illness due to a vagina a baby boy should never have had? What value could a pseudo vagina ever have been to a two-day-old baby? Was I part of a medical experiment?

You are correct. This experiment was intended first to show an evolutinary background and further to show there is NO difference between the sexes as both are fully interchangeable. This is a MEDICAL practitioner lie from the beginning.

Related: Transgender activists are using this classic strategy to numb the public to their radical agenda 

If this isn’t child abuse of the highest order, I don’t know what could ever qualify. Where is it written that doctors are permitted to make life altering decisions that involve sex change rather than repair of birth defects? The answer is that these people believe they are smarter than everyone else and uniquely qualified to do so by their own dictates. These are the type of people that will make up the New World order in the last days.

In 2020 the world experienced a major pandemic of Corona virus in which the World Health Organization encouraged countries to take quick and dramatic action to save lives. The world experienced unprecedented measures to contain the spread of this virus including individual sheltering in homes, masks to be worn in public and social distancing. There were daily media reports citing the number of deaths, recent infections and soon calls for testing methods.

Fear was gripping the world and it was exploited to the fullest to justify draconian measures to try and flatten the number of infections. We were told there could be additional flareups as we moved further into the crisis. New Jersey's governor indicated the state would remain locked down until a vaccine was discovered.  Why the need for a specialized vaccine when the actual death tolls were approximately equal to a bad influenza year? Fear is a powerful motivator and we've seen it employed throughout the pandemic as a motivator for things that wouldn't be accepted otherwise. Expect the same scenario to intensify for acceptance of the new Covid-19 vaccine.

The first rule of global marketing  is "a crisis is a terrible thing to waste' especially when one fails to act fully on an unprecedented opportunity to profit.  Second, a  little history to aid in understanding. I invite you to follow the money:

In 2011, the German company Curevax was given $33 million for research & development for RNA vaccine

In 2013, Moderna Therapeutic was given $25 million for development of an RNA vaccine

In 2015 Inovio was given 45 million for DNA vaccine using NANO technology which involves tiny microscopic robotic organisms. The NANO technology is capable of linking with a smart phone sending information continuously to an AI device.

Now note the involvement of DARPA, the Pentagon's 'Defense Advanced Research Development Agency'

In 2010, DARPA developed a noninvasive electoporeis gel patch using micro needles that can hardly be felt. It is a DNA/RNA patch intended to enhance/subvert humans at a genetic level.

In 2012 DARPA announced a brain machine interface between AI & the human brain that forms a neural network capable of remote communication.

The vaccine

The MRC5 (aborted cell line) from the 1960s and containing mercury & aluminum derivatives will likely be the basis. These mutagenic cell lines and toxins cause unknown problems. The recombinant RNA/DNA causes unknown permanent changes to your DNA.

Now the vaccine and participant particulars

All the companies are supported by the Gate's foundation.

(1) Recombinant DNA is part of the Covid-19 vaccine

(2) Trials are fast tracked

(3) Companies are exempt from randomized placebo trials

(3) Companies such as Glaxo-Smith-Kline are exempt from product liability

The Covid-19 apps are to contain this technology, all that's needed is the hydrogel and everything in your body can continuously be monitored. This could permanently change what it means to be human.

A Doctor's extensive report on the contents of Covid-19 vaccine. The covid-19 vaccine being developed is a recombinant DNA based vaccine capable of permanently altering the recipients human genetic code

by Jessica Cussins

Sitting down to watch the science fiction film The Perfect 46, I had the strange sensation of walking through a hall of mirrors. Intriguingly meta-conscious, and perceptibly close to reality, this film highlights the world of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetics and makes it clear that this technology, now at our real-world doorsteps, could drastically shape our very near future.  [Emphasis - DNI]

The story centers on the aptly named company ThePerfect46, which starts off with a seemingly innocuous mission. Taking advantage of the fact that most Californians have had their genomes sequenced by this undefined point in time, it simply offers to analyze a couple’s genomes alongside each other to determine their ability to have a disease-free child.  

But founder and CEO Jesse Darden isn’t content to stop there. In a move that sparks internal controversy and leads to one staff person abandoning the project, he rolls out version 2.0, which allows the company to search through giant databases and match random people together based solely on their ability to create genetically “ideal” children. The film cuts back and forth between a tense situation unfolding for Darden, flashbacks of his life, and a documentary film made about his rise and fall. 

While The Perfect 46 is a fictional film, it is being promoted by a real-life website purporting to actually sell ThePerfect46 product (kudos for the smart marketing ploy!). 

Darden, played quite well by Whit Hertford, is the star of The Perfect 46. He is a Steve Jobs-esque anti-hero: the disliked techie genius, the man behind the company that aims to improve humanity but ends up causing great harm. Darden comes across as “a tortured genius… a character that can be lauded and loathed in equal measure.” He is romanticized as smart and entrepreneurial, but his considerable personal and inter-personal flaws are never out of view. 

Perhaps by now both Darden and ThePerfect46 sound strangely familiar. If so, it’s probably because the similarities to companies and products that actually exist right now are jarring. This is a kind of science fiction that is only just barely fictional.

In fact, writer and director Brett Ryan Bonowicz calls The Perfect 46 “science factual.” He invited a number of researchers to be consultants on the film and strove to show “a respect for science.” The scientific community has applauded his use of “authentic science” and raved about how the film is “a refreshing change of pace” because it doesn’t dissolve into a dystopian nightmare.  Here Bonowicz elaborates on why he pursued this approach,

[Note:  The burning question remains:  Can they really decode anyone’s genome?  Answer:  No.

Remember that the “human genome” is defined as the total DNA in both the nucleus and the mitochondria outside the nucleus of a cell.  Aside from the fact that only about 15% of  “THE” Human Genome has still only been decoded (along with problems like individual genomes are unique;  the sample consisted of mixing multiple samples from people around the world;  only the nuclear genes, and only their extrons, were addressed, etc. (see:  http://web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/project/index.shtml), what about that part of an individual’s genome provided by the person’s mitochondria?  And what about the 85% of the nuclear genes in an individual’s cells that was called “junk DNA” in the “introns” of those nuclear genes until lately?  Are these “kits” even capable of determining the mitochondria and the “junk DNA” in those “introns”?  See, e.g.: 

--  “DNA is actually not well understood. 97% of human DNA is called ³junk² because scientists do not know its function. The workings of a single cell are so complex, no one knows the whole of it. Yet the biotech companies have already planted millions of acres with genetically engineered crops, and they intend to engineer every crop in the world.”

Genetic Engineering and “Junk” DNA, Genetic Engineering, at:  http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/ramyasekaran-1541143-genetic-engineering/

--  The Astonishing Powers of "Junk" DNA

http://www.khouse.org/enews_article/2012/1982/

--  Most of What you Read was Wrong: How Press Releases Rewrote Scientific History, Center for Genetics and Society, at: 

http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=6390

--  Never-Seen-Before Secret DNA Code And An 'Unusual Meaning'-Scientists Find, at:  http://www.designntrend.com/articles/9627/20131214/never-seen-before-secret-dna-code-unusual-meaning-scientists-find.htm 

-- Junk DNA — Not So Useless After All

“Researchers report on a new revelation about the human genome: it’s full of active, functioning DNA, and it's a lot more complex than we ever thought, at:  http://healthland.time.com/2012/09/06/junk-dna-not-so-useless-after-all/

--  What Junk DNA? It’s an Operating System;  Their report adds to growing experimental support for the idea that all that extra stuff in the human genes, once referred to as “junk DNA,” is more than functionless, space-filling material that happens to make up nearly 98% of the genome. http://www.genengnews.com/insight-and-intelligenceand153/what-junk-dna-it-s-an-operating-system/77899872/ 

Given that their claims don’t even mention those DNA’s gives an indication that they don’t.  So what does an individual who buys such “kits” really end of knowing about their genome -- and how can any medical or eugenic decisions be based on such “information”?  Indeed, how can any supposed “ideal child” be genetically designed at all?  Is so-called “positive eugenics” a bunch of nonsense?  Perhaps the above, too, is a “discussion that deserves to be out in the public”!  In fact, much of what passes as "genetics research" and the "kits" described below would seem to border on scientific fraud -- and someone should be held legally accountable. The article first appeared here.

Caveat emptor!  --  DNI]

by Kenrick Vezina

Illustration by Yan Liang, via MIT News.

A team at MIT has combined techniques from synthetic biology and materials engineering to create hybrid “living materials”: bacteria engineered to take up functional nanoparticles and grow into thin layers with usable properties, like electrical conduction or light emission. This achievement is a perfect follow-up to news from earlier this month that another group at MIT had successfully created bionic plants   [Emphasis Others] (Read our Gene-ius post on the news here.)

Anne Trafton, writing for MIT News, reports: 

These “living materials” combine the advantages of live cells, which respond to their environment, produce complex biological molecules, and span multiple length scales, with the benefits of nonliving materials, which add functions such as conducting electricity or emitting light. 

The organic analog of choice is bone. As Amina Kahn at the Los Angeles Times puts it:

 Our bones are remarkable feats of engineering; strong and yet light, shot through with holes and yet able to bear incredible loads. This super-strong natural material is built as cells incorporate hard minerals like calcium into living tissue. 

The MIT team, led by assistant professor of electrical engineering and biological engineering Timothy Lu, was inspired by this interplay of living cells with nonliving components.

The process Lu and his team used begins with the bacteria E. coli and genetic engineering. They chose E. coli because it naturally produces thin, slimy films that adhere to surfaces — it’s this adhesion that’s key. In order to adhere to surfaces, E. coli produces “curli fibers”, comprised of repeating protein chains.

The MIT team replaced the bacteria’s ability to produce curli fibers with an engineered genetic circuit that only produces curli fibers if given a certain molecule. Now the team essentially has an on-off switch for the bacteria and can control the formation of biofilms: supply the bacteria with the trigger molecule and they produce curli fibers and form biofilms.

On top of this, the team engineered another set of E. coli with a similar on-off switch but based on a different molecular trigger. And these bacteria were modified one step further: researchers altered the genes coding for the creation of curli fibers so that the protein chains would grab on to gold nanoparticles. 

So they had two varieties of engineered bacteria, both controllable via distinct molecule of their choosing, and one of the two’s ability to latch onto its environment with curli fibers has been co-opted to make the bacteria gather tiny bits of gold from its environment. 

Take both varieties, grow them together; manage their growth relative to one another with the two on-off molecules; and supply some nanoscale bits of gold. The researchers did just this and managed to coax the bacteria to build a tiny film laced through with gold nanowires: a conductive surface comprised of living cells. 

And the conductive biofilm is just one of several proofs-of-concept to come out of this project. 

The team was also able to embed quantum dots — semiconductor nanoparticles that glow a particular color after being illuminated by light — in their biofilm through a similar technique.

The potential applications for these living materials include batteries and solar cells, diagnostic devices and scaffolds for tissue engineering. According to Trafton, “The researchers are also interested in coating the biofilms with enzymes that catalyze the breakdown of cellulose, which could be useful for converting agricultural waste to biofuels.”

This latest breakthrough is sure to be one of many similar efforts that blurs the perceived boundaries between living and nonliving, artificial and organic. We’re increasingly able, as Lu and his team demonstrate, to manipulate our world at the level of molecules and atoms — whether those are DNA molecules or gold nanowiring.

• “Engineers design ‘living materials’,” Anne Trafton | MIT News
• “Scientists build man-made ‘living-materials’ inside bacterial cells,” Amina Khan | LA Times
• “MIT scientists engineer ‘cells that talk to each other’,” Sudeshna Chowdhury | Christian Science Monitor
• “Synthesis and patterning of tunable multiscale materials with engineered cells,” Nature Materials

Additional Resources:

• “Bionic plants developed at MIT focus on the “tech” half of biotech,” Genetic Literacy Project (Anne Trafton | MIT News)
• “Living Materials Respond to the Environment and Communicate With Each Other,” Dexter Johnson | IEEE Spectrum