The Patriots

Bombshell study: Pfizer’s covid jab contents enter the liver, alter human chromosomes and rewrite DNA

CDC caught lying, refuses to comment…

Image Bombshell study Pfizers covid jab contents enter the liver alter human chromosomes and rewrite DNA

(Natural News) Swedish researchers from Lund University have found that the contents of Pfizer’s Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” enter human liver cells and convert into DNA.

When the jab’s messenger RNA (mRNA) spike proteins are injected into the body, they travel to the liver and trigger DNA located inside the nuclei of liver cells. This increases the expression of the LINE-1 gene that makes mRNA.

After this is complete, the mRNA leaves the nuclei and enters the cytoplasm of cells, translating into LINE-1 protein. A segment of this protein called the open reading frame-1 or ORF-1 then goes back into the nuclei of liver cells where it attaches to the jab’s mRNA and reverse transcribes it into spike DNA.

Reverse transcription is when DNA is made from RNA, by the way. The normal transcription process, on the other hand, involves a portion of the DNA serving as a template to make an mRNA molecule inside the nuclei.

“In this study we present evidence that COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 is able to enter the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro,” the researchers wrote in a paper that was published in the journal Current Issues of Molecular Biology.

“BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA as fast as 6 [hours] after BNT162b2 exposure,” they added, BNT162b2 being another name for the Pfizer-BioNTech injection the two companies are calling a “vaccine” – another name for the jab is Comirnaty.

CDC lied about mRNA shots, claimed they would never enter cell nuclei

The entire process described above occurs in just six hours. The Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA injection converts into artificial DNA during this time, which contradicts what the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has long said about how the jabs supposedly work.

“The genetic material delivered by mRNA vaccines never enters the nucleus of your cells,” still reads the CDC’s web page entitled, “Myths and Facts about COVID-19 Vaccines.”

This is the first time, by the way, that researchers have shown either in vitro or in a petri dish how mRNA injections convert into DNA on a human liver cell line. Again, the “experts” and “fact checkers” continue to falsely claim that this is not possible.

“COVID-19 vaccines do not change or interact with your DNA in any way,” the CDC still claims about both the mRNA injections and the viral vector alternatives from Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and AstraZeneca.

Ever since the shots were launched by Donald Trump under Operation Warp Speed, the “authorities” have insisted that the contents of the shots are quickly discarded by the body once antibodies are produced, which is a lie.

“These vaccines deliver genetic material that instructs cells to begin making spike proteins found on the surface of SARS-CoV-2 that causes COVID-19 to produce an immune response,” reports The Epoch Times.

A Pfizer spokesperson responded to the new study’s revelations by claiming falsely that its mRNA injection “does not alter the DNA sequence of a human cell.”

“It only presents the body with the instructions to build immunity,” this person still claims.

Another thing the Swedish study revealed is that mRNA spike proteins on the surface of liver cells could cause autoimmune hepatitis.

“[T]here [have] been case reports on individuals who developed autoimmune hepatitis after BNT162b2 vaccination,” the study authors wrote.

They also presented the first reported case of a healthy 35-year-old female who developed autoimmune hepatitis one week after her first “dose” of Pfizer’s mRNA injection.

There is a possibility, the authors further wrote, that “spike-directed antibodies induced by vaccination may also trigger autoimmune conditions in predisposed individuals.”

The latest news about Pfizer’s mRNA injection can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.

Sources for this article include:

TheEpochTimes.com

NaturalNews.com

Facebook Twitter

Meet Ray Epps: The Fed-Protected Provocateur Who Appears To Have Led The Very First 1/6 Attack On The U.S. Capitol

by RevolverNews

In a House hearing on Thursday, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) questioned AG Merrick Garland about a mysterious man, Ray Epps, instructing protesters to enter the US Capitol building on January 5, and who later shepherded crowds towards the Capitol on January 6.

There is good reason why AG Garland ran from Massie’s question faster than he could find words — and why he couldn’t even keep eye contact as he was dodging Massie’s gaze.

After months of research, Revolver’s investigative reporting team can now reveal that Ray Epps appears to be among the primary orchestrators of the very first breach of the Capitol’s police barricades at 12:50pm on January 6. Epps appears to have led the “breach team” that committed the very first illegal acts on that fateful day. What’s more, Epps and his “breach team” did all their dirty work with 10 minutes still remaining in President Trump’s National Mall speech, and with the vast majority of Trump supporters still 30 minutes away from the Capitol.

Secondly, Revolver also determined, and will prove below, that the the FBI stealthily removed Ray Epps from its Capitol Violence Most Wanted List on July 1, just one day after Revolver exposed the inexplicable and puzzlesome FBI protection of known Epps associate and Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes. July 1 was also just one day after separate New York Times report amplified a glaring, falsifiable lie about Epps’s role in the events of January 6.

Lastly, Ray Epps appears to have worked alongside several individuals — many of them suspiciously unindicted — to carry out a breach of the police barricades that induced a subsequent flood of unsuspecting MAGA protesters to unwittingly trespass on Capitol restricted grounds and place themselves in legal jeopardy.

Corroborating Ray Epps’s Identity

Identifying the individual in Thomas Massie’s video as Ray Epps was a surprisingly quick and easy task for the Internet.

I questioned Attorney General Garland about whether there were Federal Agents present on 1/6 and whether they agitated to go into the Capitol. Attorney General Garland refused to answer. pic.twitter.com/RHq3Yd2pbu

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) October 21, 2021

CHECK OUT THE NEWS FEED—FOLLOW US ON GAB—FOLLOW US ON GETTR

The story of the mystery man, Ray Epps, featured in Rep. Massie’s video above is in fact far more shocking than even the good Congressman implies in the hearing. It’s a story so strange, and so scandalous at every turn, that it threatens to shatter the entire official narrative of the “Capitol Breach” and expose yet another dimension of proactive federal involvement in the so-called “insurrection” of January 6th.

If Revolver News’s previous reporting points to a proactive role of the federal government in relation to the conspiracy cases against Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, the Ray Epps story that follows suggests a similar, yet more egregious, explicit, direct and immediate degree of federal involvement in the breach of the Capitol itself.

Here is a transcript of Thomas Massie’s exchange with the Attorney General, just in case you skipped past the video above.

Rep. Massie: As far as we can determine, the individual who was saying he’ll probably go to jail, he’ll probably be arrested, but they need to go into the Capitol the next day, is then directing people into the Capitol the next day, is then the next day directing people to the Capitol. And as far as we can find. You said this is one of the most sweeping in history. Have you seen that video, or those frames from that video?

AG Garland: So as I said at the outset, one of the norms of the Justice Department is to not comment on pending investigations, and particularly not to comment on particular scenes or particular individuals.

Rep. Massie: I was hoping today to give you an opportunity to put to rest the concerns that people have that there were federal agents or assets of the federal government present on January 5 and January 6. Can you tell us, without talking about particular incidents or particular videos, how many agents or assets of the federal government were present on January 6, whether they agitated to go into the Capitol, and if any of them did?

AG Garland: So I’m not going to violate this norm of, uh, of, of, of, the rule of law.

[Looks down and away]

I’m not going to comment on an investigation that’s ongoing.

There is good reason why AG Garland ran from Massie’s question faster than he could find words — and why he couldn’t even keep eye contact as he was dodging Massie’s gaze.

Corroborating Ray Epps’s Identity

Identifying the individual in Thomas Massie’s video as Ray Epps was a surprisingly quick and easy task for the Internet.

The Shotgun

This is coming to America if we don’t stand up against the socialist Left….

You're sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your bedroom door. Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers.

At least two people have broken into your house and are moving your way. With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up your shotgun. You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it...

In the darkness, you make out two shadows. One holds something that looks like a crowbar. When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the shotgun and fire. The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. One writhes and screams while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside.

As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you're in trouble.In your country, most guns were outlawed years before, and the few that are privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them useless. Yours was never registered.

  Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died.They arrest you for First Degree Murder and Illegal Possession of a Firearm.

When you talk to your attorney, he tells you not to worry: authorities will probably plea the case down to manslaughter.

"What kind of sentence will I get?" you ask.

"Only ten-to-twelve years," he replies, as if that's nothing. "Behave yourself, and you'll be out in seven."

The next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper.

Somehow, you're portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men you shot are represented as choirboys.

  Their friends and relatives can't find an unkind word to say about them.

Buried deep down in the article, authorities acknowledge that both "victims" have been arrested numerous times.

But the next day's headline says it all: "Lovable Rogue Son Didn't Deserve to Die."

The thieves have been transformed from career criminals into Robin Hood-type pranksters.

As the days wear on, the story takes wings. The national media picks it up, then the international media. The surviving burglar has become a folk hero. Your attorney says the thief is preparing to sue you, and he'll probably win.

The media publishes reports that your home has been burglarized several times in the past and that you've been critical of local police for their lack of effort in apprehending the suspects.

After the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared next time.

The District Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars.

A few months later, you go to trial. The charges haven't been reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted. When you take the stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works against you.

Prosecutors paint a picture of you as a mean, vengeful man. It doesn't take long for the jury to convict you of all charges. The judge sentences you to life in prison.



This case really happened.

On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk, England, killed one burglar and wounded a second.

In April, 2000, he was convicted  and is now serving a life term.

How did it become a crime to defend one's own life in the once great British Empire?

  It started with the Pistols Act of 1903.

This seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and established that handgun sales were to be made only to those who had a license.

The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms except shotguns..

Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns.

Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the Hungerford mass shooting in 1987.

  Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the street shooting everyone he saw. When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead.

The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of "gun control", demanded even tougher restrictions. (The seizure of all privately owned handguns was the objective even though Ryan used a rifle.)

Nine years later, at Dunblane, Scotland, Thomas Hamilton used a semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public school.
For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable, or worse, criminals. Now the press had a real kook with which to beat up law-abiding gun owners.

Day after day, week after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all handguns. The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, sealed the fate of the few sidearm's still owned by private citizens.

During the years in which the British government incrementally took away most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to armed self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism.

Authorities refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a gun. Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged while the real criminals were released.
Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as saying, "We cannot have people take the law into their own hands."

All of Tony Martin's neighbors had been robbed numerous times, and several elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no fear of the consequences. Martin himself, a collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by burglars.

When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given three months to turn them over to local authorities.

Being good British subjects, most people obeyed the law.
The few who didn't were visited by police and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn't comply.

Police later bragged that they'd taken nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens.

How did the authorities know who had handguns? . . .

The guns had been registered and licensed.
Kind of like cars. Sound familiar?

WAKE UP AMERICA;

THIS IS WHY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS PUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION.

"...It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
--Samuel Adams

Mike Lindel's expose of 2020 Total election Corruption

Election Fraud? The biggest cyber attack in the history of the world?

Do we still have a country? This is the most comprehensive documentation

that has ever been presented to date. Is there anyone left in our government

that isn’t comprised? Has China with the help of the democratic/socialist party

completely infiltrated our political systems beyond recovery?

Thanks to Mike Lindell’s tireless efforts to stand up for truth

you can now…. DECIDE FOR YOUSELF.

Mike Lindell's 'Absolute Proof' Documentary

https://www.bitchute.com/video/FwX3oxjHqhE2/

Previous
Page 1
2
Next
Last