by Allen Williams
The Lead Up to the Hearing: Missouri v. Biden ( https://www.uncoverdc.com/2023/05/24/the-lead-up-to-the-hearing-missouri-v-biden/)
So we finally discover that there is One judge with the stones to stand up for freedom. Now if only there were some election integrity judge with similar stones we could get our country back. So we now know government has been working to silence facts they don’t particularly like, big surprise.
The complaint alleged that the US Government was not only threatening and coercing social media companies to censor Americans on social media, but they were also working WITH social media companies to accomplish that goal. It alleged that topics surrounding COVID-19, the origins of COVID, the Great Barrington Declaration, election integrity concerns, the COVID shot, the Hunter Biden laptop story (and more) were under scrutiny by the White House and other government agencies – and that the government had very publicly threatened to take action against social media companies should they not act to censor viewpoints on those topics that were disfavored by the government.
Missouri and Louisiana have filed a joint lawsuit against govt censorship and are having more success than election integrity cases sine the case drew a judge with stones and he is making progress. What a refreshing change !
"Unlike what many have come to expect, the judge GRANTED the motion for expedited discovery and depositions. A struggle ensued between the Government and the Plaintiffs, with the government fighting against the judge in this case (Judge Terry Doughty) to stop discovery and certain plaintiffs from being deposed. They took those complaints to the 5th Circuit of Appeals and a court in Virginia – a court that *usually* is friendly to the government. ."."At the appellate court level, the government argued that NO ONE should have to leave their government jobs to sit for lengthy depositions in this case, but certainly not the HEAD of CISA, for example…The appellate court wouldn’t play ball with the government and remanded the case back to Louisiana with some guidance on how the judge should proceed. If memory serves me right, this happened three times."
Perhaps Kari Lake’s legal team should get this judge to hear her election fraud case. Something may just get done.This is real encouraging that people are beginning to realize and react to the law-fare taking over the country. However some very disturbing ideas have come out of this testimony.One particularly interesting exchange came with the deposition of former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki… She made threats to social media companies from the podium. ..
The government said they had no responsive documents to explain her comments. So Missouri and Louisiana said, “Then we have to depose Jen Psaki. The court agreed and ruled that now private citizen Psaki needed to testify. The government and Psaki- represented by Rhee – went to a court in Virginia to try to get THAT judge to stop the deposition…The judge, in that case, laid into both the government and Psaki. It was so stunning I literally read the transcript of the hearing as its own video.
This [case] went back to Louisiana after the Virginia judge said, “You won’t like how I rule on this, and your argument is terrible, so I’m sending it back to the judge who SHOULD be making this decision. The judge in Louisiana again decided Psaki should be deposed IF the government didn’t have any responsive docs from the press office.
"The most widespread and troubling discovery? CISA has designated YOUR THOUGHTS part of the government’s infrastructure. They call it “cognitive infrastructure.” They argue they can regulate what you think as they consider it under their purview.Wow ! This really makes me rethink mental health requirements for elected officials. The case reads like a dystopian novel but my ‘hat is off’ to the judge who has exhibited some real ‘moxy’ in putting a stop to this draconian nonsense.
"They also argued that all of these agencies worked independently of one another; that there wasn’t any coordination between them. As we will see, that is patently false. They didn’t all simultaneously decide to act to get social platforms to ban what they didn’t want you to see. As the evidence proves, there was conspiracy behind the censorship. The White House campaign integrated with the Surgeon General, the CDC, and Census Bureau campaigns drew directly from White House pressure. NIAID and NIH censorship efforts draw from the CDC. CISA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI, and other agencies worked together, and all participate in meetings together to facilitate pressure and censorship."So there you have it an ‘official government conspiracy’ which should put to bed the media and CIA’s derogatory reference to dissidents as ‘conspiracy theorists’ How do you like them apples, eh?. Based on what I”ve read, the judge seems very likely to rule for plaintiffs. I encourage everyone to follow this trial at the reference given since there is far too much information to report on it here.
This case is worth following up !
