by Allen Williams
Thank you for the reply.
I'd like to take the opportunity to clarify several issues raised in
your recent email. The first is your statement that over
"250 audits of the 2020 election were performed in accordance with
state law." Your definition of 'audit' can't mean anymore than
resolving vote tallies between ballot images and actual ballots. This procedure has NOT worked very well in
the Windham, New Hampshire audit to date
None of Michigan's alleged audits looked into the machine's works to
verify whether or not the components contained therein were legal.
So, to clarify, the only valid Michigan audit performed to date
was in Amtrim county which required a lawsuit to initiate. It
has been demonstrated in the 13th circuit court Antrim county
lawsuit forensic audit that there was Dominion voting machine
intervention in the election. An examination inside
the voting machine revealed an unauthorized program, Microsoft SQL,a
feature that permits vote manipulation. In addition judge
Eisenheimer allowed the audit to cover 13 addition precincts in
Antrim county where some 1060+ votes were recorded over and above
Antrim county's voting population, memory traces were found inside
the machine showing previous contact with Taiwan and Germany demonstrating
both internet connectivity and foreign election interference. This
is not an isolated incident involving voting machine fraud as there
are additional incidents in Windham county, New Hampshire where
Dominion is shorting the vote tallies and a separate forensic
analysis is still underway in Maricopa County, AZ where key files in
the EMS vote tabulator were found deleted.
The second is from my letter to Judge Eisenheimer which
stated Judge
Murray previously ruled that Jocelyn Benson's decision to
assume the signatures on absentee ballots were inherently valid
(What?), this assumption violates Michigan law which makes her
complicit in the 1060+ ghost mail in ballots identified in the
forensic audit. Benson was added as a defendant in Attorney Matt
Deperno/s second amended complaint. Read it at http://depernolaw.com.
100
Percent Fed Up reports – In March, Attorney Matt DePerno
subpoenaed 8 clerks in key counties in Michigan: Barry,
Charlevoix, Grand Traverse, Kent, Livingston, Macomb, Oakland, and
Wayne. In his subpoenas, DePerno asked to have access to their
poll tapes, ballots, logs, tally servers, election management
servers, election media, spreadsheets, and canvasser notes from
the 2020 election. The judge denied their requests after all 8
counties filed motions to quash his request. In Grand Traverse
County, Haider Kazim and Michigan’s dishonest Democrat Secretary
of State filed a joint motion to quash DePerno’s request.
The forensic evidence and the court's determination that
Secretary Benson violated state law should have been more
than enough to alert the Michigan legislature to at least
investigate MaComb, Oakland, Wayne, and Kent counties for
similar irregularities. And if found, immediate steps should have
been taken to decertify the election, except that certain Republican
members share culpability in advocating for and purchasing Dominion
voting machines.
Everyone makes mistakes, You would have retained much more
credibility If you would have admitted mistakes and then acted
to correct them, instead of doing nothing but obstructing people who
were trying to get at the truth. It is your constitutional
responsibility to discipline judges who prevent cases from
proceeding pursuant to real evidence in order to reinforce the
illusion that American elections are secure. It is your
responsibility to address electoral fraud issues that have been
revealed by the Antrim county forensic audit.
THIS IS CORRUPTION at the highest levels of Michigan
government.
And last: This is all part of the general movement to silence
individuals who accuse state officials of corruption as has been
revealed in Dr. Shiva's Massachusetts lawsuit Case
1:20-cv-11889-MLW Document 118 Filed 05/21/21 Page 1 of 7 at:
https://vashiva.com/first-amendment-twitter-galvin-lawsuit/
where it was revealed that an official manual for silencing accusers
exists entitled 'Elections Influence Operations Playbook for
State and Local Officials.'
As I have stated before this issue is NOT going away.
You needn't bother creating further election legislation because
without addressing the 2020 election fraud, new legislation will
simply be ignored as Secretary Benson has aptly demonstrated.
Your inaction threatens the continuance of America's
Representative Republic.
On 5/25/2021 1:02 PM, MI Rep. Wentworth
wrote:
Hi Allen,
Thank you for reaching out
to the Office of Speaker Jason
Wentworth regarding your concerns
about the integrity of Michigan
elections. As you know, safe elections
are a cornerstone of our democracy and
it is essential that all Michiganders
trust every election.
Our office has been
listening to the voters of the 97th
district and across Michigan that
share your same concerns. Speaker
Wentworth will continue working hard
to ensure our elections are secure.
Over 250 audits were
performed in accordance with state law
and the Michigan Constitution. The
results of the election were formally
confirmed by these audits, which
included hand counts from selected
precincts throughout the state.
The House has also approved
several reform measures this year to
ensure our elections run fairly. These
include plans to remove dead people
from our voter rolls, require
verification of a person’s birth date
when their birth date is unknown
before voting, and to provide more
training for everyone involved in the
elections process.
In the latest challenge
originating in Antrim County, a
circuit court judge ruled that a
post-election audit hand count showed
results largely consistent with the
canvass totals entered by the state,
and the plantiffs’ request for another
audit was satisfied by the hand
recount.
Michigan families deserve
fair and safe elections – and Speaker
Wentworth remains committed to
supporting bold, common-sense reforms
to do just that.
Thank you again for
contacting the Office of Speaker Jason
Wentworth to share your perspective.
If my staff or I can be of further
assistance, please call 517-373-8962
or email JasonWentworth@house.mi.gov.
Sincerely,
Office of Speaker Jason
Wentworth, District 97
Learn about the work I'm doing for
the 97th district!
164
Capitol Building
P.O. Box 30014
Lansing, MI
48909-7514
Phone: (517)
373-8962
|
[80QKOQ-PGYO]
Judge Eisenheimer:
I was not really surprised by your decision to dismiss the Antrim
County election lawsuit indicating an unwillingness to address the
criminal fraud uncovered in the case. But I was truly appalled at
the lack of logic displayed in your reasoning. As Uncover
Dc reports:
- One, the Plaintiffs claims are
moot as all requested relief has been granted and,
therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction to review moot
claims;
- Two, Plaintiff lacks standing to
bring its claims into court; and
- Three, Plaintiff has failed to
state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
This is absolute nonsense. Plaintiffs claims in
One
are NOT moot, they have successfully demonstrated
FRAUD. You have an obligation to follow the evidence trail where
ever it leads, Why this concept has eluded you poses some
interesting questions..
Plaintiff does
not lack standing. The Michigan
constitution was amended in 2018 to grant standing for any person
to challenge the results of a state wide election. The secretary
of state's supposed audit is NOT a substitute for a further Antrim
county audit nor does it satisfy the pleadings of Mr. Bailey since
(1) Benson was included as a defendant in the amended complaint
and (2)
Judge
Murray previously ruled that Jocelyn Benson's decision to
assume the signatures on absentee ballots were inherently valid
(What?) when this assumption violated Michigan law which makes her
complicit in the 1060+ ghost mail in ballots identified in the
forensic audit. This incredible statement by you infers that (1)
you lack legal discernment OR (2) it was a direct attempt to block
the audit from continuing.
Your final statement that plaintiff
has failed to state a basis
for which relief might be granted demonstrates a deliberate
attempt to end the case rather than pursue the fraud wherever it
might lead. The obvious next step would have been to investigate
several other counties to see if they got similar results using
the Dominion machines. Your willingness to allow other county
clerks to quash subpoenas for the Dominion election evidence, when
fraud had been clearly demonstrated in Antrim county, corroborates
my suspicion that you have been compromised. Anyone with an ounce
of gray matter has to suspect that you have either been
blackmailed or threatened into rendering this decision
The obvious takeaway here is that you had to have been surprised
by Attn. Deperno's findings that a stolen school board election
was only a small portion of a greater fraud to deny the American
public their rightful selection of President. At this point, you
must have experienced some panic as you became aware that this
case would be the first to expose the wholesale fraud of the 'most
secure election in American History'
Lastly, blocking further discovery, when new evidence has
surfaced, confirms my suspicions and further suggests that the
state legislature (if that had any collective backbone) should
remove you from the bench.
Just a reminder to you and your fellow obstructionists
that
this issue is NOT going away, we the people will get to the
bottom of it.
