Who’s Stealing America?

                       2020 Election Investigative Documentary: Who’s Stealing America?  

 

                                                    

 
                            For those that feel this is too long to watch or perhaps believe it does not concern them, it is suggested
                           that you slide the cursor to the 1:23 mark on the video and watch the following four minutes. If at that point
                           you are not concerned enough to view this in it’s entirety you will join a long list of people that prefer
                           to remain ignorant rather than face the absolute fact that 2020 may very well be the end of our Republic
                           and the introduction of a communist state. This may well be the most important post I have ever made.
 
 
 
 

The Anatomy of a Stolen Election - The Fraud Cannot Stand

By Larry Johnson


With each passing day the evidence of electoral fraud in the Presidential election mounts. Other than the excellent reporting by the Gateway Pundit team, most of the media—both print and electronic—are engaged in a full blown propaganda campaign to try to persuade the American public that claims of fraud are debunked conspiracy theories. Not since the bad old days of the Soviet Union have we witnessed such contemptible lying. Compared to Baghdad Bob’s denial that US tanks had overrun Iraq—the equivalent of a grenade exploding–the current campaign of falsehoods is comparable to a fleet of B52s dropping hydrogen bombs.

The Democrat plan to steal the election went beyond the old tactics of voting the graveyard. This time it included manufactured ballots with only old Joe Biden’s name attached and voting machines that would count those ballots in multiples while counting Donald Trump votes as less than one. All of these machines had a software backdoor that was accessed by Democrat operatives and their Silicon Valley helpers as well as the Chinese.

Using this combination of manufactured ballots and machine manipulation, the results in six key states are fraudulent and more than sufficient to prove that the Fraudulent votes exceeded Biden’s alleged margin of victory in each of these states:

PENNSYLVANIA (20 Electoral votes)

Biden + 81,000 votes

Fraudulent: 121,000 votes


WISCONSIN
(10 Electoral votes)

Biden + 20,000 votes

Fraudulent 200,000 votes


ARIZONA
(11 Electoral votes)

Biden 10,000 votes


Has the Penn Supreme Court Invited Scrutiny and Rebuke By Relying on "Laches" to Dismiss an Incovenient Complaint?

By Shipwreckedcrew


Late in the day on Saturday the Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed with prejudice the complaint filed by GOP Congressman Mike Kelly, failed GOP candidate Sean Parnell, and others, claiming that the “no excuse” mail-in ballot option created by the Pennsylvania legislature in 2019 violated Section 14 of Pennsylvania Constitution.  That Section limits “absentee” voting to four narrow categories of “absent electors”. The complaint alleged that because Section 14 is itself a constitutional limit on exceptions to in-person voting, the no-excuse mail-in voting statute worked as a de facto amendment to the Pennsylvania Constitution without going through the required  process for amending the Constitution.

Without addressing the merits of the complaint in any fashion, the Court ordered the case dismissed on the equitable grounds of “laches”, finding that the “facial” challenge to the constitutionality of Act 77, the law which created no-excuse mail-in balloting, was a matter the plaintiffs could have brought the time the Act was passed.  The Court found a lack of diligence from the fact that they did nothing for more than a year, during which time both a primary and general election took place in which “no-excuse” mail-in voting procedures were employed.

I’m going to make a point here, at the outset, that is somewhat out of place because I want the readers to keep it in mind as they read through the remainder of this article.

The Kelly complaint alleges that Act 77 changed the voting process in Pennsylvania in a manner that amended the Pennsylvania Constitution, without going through the process for making amendments to the Constitution as set forth therein.


The opponents of the Kelly complaint — joined by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in dismissing the complaint — are possessed by the issue of whether millions of Pennsylvania electors will be “disenfranchised if “no-excuse” absentee voting is declared to be invalid due to the complaint.

What I have not seen commented on — and that failure is why I put this issue here at the top — is that one of the approvals required in the process for amending the Pennsylvania Constitution is that proposed Amendments must receive a majority vote of Pennsylvania electors in a general election.

The voters of Pennsylvania were entitled to have a say in whether the Constitution’s provisions regarding elections and voting should be amended.  The General Assembly, Governor, Secretary of the Commonwealth, and County Boards of Election DISENFRANCHISED Pennsylania voters by imposing a “no-excuse” change to the “absentee ballot” provisions of the Constitution without first getting their approval.