John Durham Wins First Part of the Fight to Obtain “Privileged” Fusion GPS Documents in Huge Blow to Clinton Campaign

by Cristina Laila


Special Prosecutor John Durham secured a victory against Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign.

As previously reported by Techno Fog, as part of the prosecution of former Clinton Campaign/DNC lawyer Michael Sussmann: Special Counsel Durham is seeking the following e-mails/communications that have been either redacted or hidden from his review:

  1. Documents involving Fusion GPS’s provision of opposition research and media-related strategies to Hillary for America, the DNC, and Perkins Coie. This includes the Fusion GPS/Perkins Coie contract and 38 e-mails and attachments between and among Fusion GPS, Rodney Joffe, and Perkins Coie.

  2. Communications between Fusion GPS and Rodney Joffe relating to the Alfa Bank allegations, and “other emails that precede, and appear to relate to, those communications.” This include emails between Joffe and Laura Seago, whom Durham has subpoenaed as a trial witness
The Clinton Campaign (including Robby Mook and John Podesta), Fusion GPS, Perkins Coie, Rodney Joffe, and the DNC are fighting to keep these e-mails and records secret, reasoning Fusion’s “role was to provide consulting services in support of the legal advice attorneys at Perkins Coie were providing to” the Clinton Campaign.

That argument – that Fusion GPS was helping with “legal advice” – is hopefully the last conspiracy theory they’ll provide to the public, after Fusion GPS has already poisoned the America, through the FBI, DOJ, and the press, with baseless allegations of secret back-channels between Trump Organization and Russian marketing servers, piss tapes, and broader allegations of Trump/Russia collusion.

John Durham won the first round in the fight to obtain the “privileged” Fusion GPS documents.

The documents will be provided to the court for in camera review.

Then the court will determine whether the “privileges” apply.



Gubernatioral Candidiate Kari Lake and SOS Mark Finchem File AZ Lawsuit to remove Electronic Voting Machines

by Summer Lane


Mike Lindell, the CEO of MyPillow and a fearless advocate for election integrity, discussed the historic preliminary injunction filed yesterday in Arizona to eliminate digital voting machines during an interview with RSBN’s Brian Glenn.

“Yesterday was [a] historic day in the history of America,” Lindell shared, standing near a line of excited rallygoers in Delaware, Ohio, ahead of Saturday night’s scheduled Save America rally event.

“We filed our first preliminary injunction in the state of Arizona to get rid of the machines once and for all. That’s the first of many, many,” he continued.

The injunction plaintiffs include Kari Lake, the Republican and Trump-endorsed candidate for Arizona governor, and Rep. Mark Finchem, R-Ariz., candidate for Arizona Secretary of State. If successful, the injunction will remove the Dominion voting machines from being used in the upcoming midterm election.

“In the 2020 election,” Lindell said, all the stuff that these states did…who was supposed to stop them? Their attorney generals.” He added that only one attorney general in the United States stood up: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

Lindell further revealed that election integrity advocates will file more preliminary injunctions across the nation to remove the voting machines, including in South Dakota, Alabama, Louisiana, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Colorado, Michigan, and Ohio.

Additionally, Ohio, which President Trump won twice, was not immune to election fraud, Lindell claims. The MyPillow CEO says that Trump actually won Ohio in 2020 with 3,400,000 votes, which is an additional 500,000 more votes than what was officially tallied.

"What I see happening is the machines are gonna be gone,” Lindell continued. “We’ve already got forty-some counties gone…and then I believe we’re gonna have the biggest turnout in history for a midterm, ever.”

In fact, Lindell says there are plans to do preliminary injunctions in all fifty states. “All machines have to go,” he said firmly.

Source: https://www.rsbnetwork.com/news/mike-lindell-on-injunctions-to-remove-voting-machines-all-machines-have-to-go/

Harris County, TX DA’s Office Blasts Judge Lina Hidalgo, Tells Her to Stop Criticizing Grand Jury That Just Indicted Her Staffers in $11 Million Vaccine Contract Probe

by Cristina Laila

The Harris County District Attorney’s Office blasted far-left judge Lina Hidalgo and told her to stop criticizing the grand jury that just indicted her top staffers.

Three of Judge Lina Hidalgo’s staffers were indicted last week after prosecutors expanded the investigation into an $11 million ‘vaccine outreach contract’ awarded to one of the judge’s political cronies.

Texas Rangers last month raided the office of Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo and executed a search warrant related to an $11 million ‘vaccine outreach contract’ awarded to one of the judge’s friends.

While Hidalgo was threatening to jail and fine people for violating her Covid rules, she was secretly trying to award one of her political cronies an $11 million ‘vaccine outreach’ contract.

Three of her staffers were indicted last week after Texas Rangers obtained a new search warrant and requested the Google accounts of Lina Hidalgo and 6 of her senior staffers.

Hidalgo lashed out at county prosecutors during an interview with ABC 13 last Wednesday, calling the charges ‘partisan politics.’

“At best, this is going forward with a fundamental misunderstanding of the facts and at worst, it is the weaponization of the criminal justice system for political purposes so I’m not going to play into that,” Hidalgo whined to ABC13. “My staffers are hardworking people. They work day and night for the people of Harris County and we’ve got work to do, like this catalytic converter issue or like childhood education, homelessness, huge wins.”

The Harris County DA’s office this week told Hidalgo to shut up and stop criticizing the grand jury.

ABC 13 reported:

The Harris County District Attorney’s Office responded Monday to an attack last week by Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo, who characterized an indictment against three of her staffers as weaponizing the system with a “flimsy” case.

Following Hidalgo’s comments, the Harris County DA’s office is now defending the grand jury, which is made up of 12 community residents.

“Grand jurors give up countless hours of personal and professional time to serve and their service should never be disparaged or dismissed,” Dane Schiller, a spokesperson for the Harris County DA’s Office, said in a statement. “We want to thank the grand jurors in these public corruption cases for their hard work over a five-month period in which they reviewed voluminous documents and heard from numerous witnesses. Our work continues.”

Hidalgo’s campaign spokesperson, Toni Harrison responded Monday afternoon, saying, “No one is disparaging the grand jury – that’s a red herring to deflect attention from recent media reports raising important questions about this investigation. The fact is, we’ll never know what the District Attorney’s Office presented to the grand jurors because the process is secret. As we’ve said since the search warrant affidavits were made public, this investigation appears to have proceeded on a fundamental misunderstanding of the facts. We’re confident now that the legal process has moved into public view, the truth will come out and the staffers who have been wrongly accused will be cleared.”

Read more

Biden Admin Urges Court Not to Allow Release of [NOT Secret] Report on Dominion Voting Machines…

by Kane


[First, it s NOT a secret report. This is the investigation by Michigan computer scientist J. Halderman and a judge sealed the document to keep the report from the republic. In his investigation, Halderman documented the fraud capabilites of the Dominion voting machine which is why Dominion is blocking the results from the 'most secure election in the country's history'  - ED]

EPOCH TIMES

Top officials at a U.S. federal cybersecurity agency are urging a judge not to authorize the release of a report that analyzes Dominion Voting Systems equipment in Georgia, arguing doing so could assist hackers trying to “undermine election security.” [or prevent anyone from finding out that the 2020 election was already HACKED! - ED] he Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was recently provided an unredacted copy of the report, which was prepared by J. Alex Halderman, director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society.

The report discusses “potential vulnerabilities in Dominion ImageCast X ballot marking devices,” or electronic voting devices, according to the government.

 While CISA supports public disclosure of any vulnerabilities with election equipment, allowing the release of the report at this point “increases the risk that malicious actors may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities and threaten election security,” government lawyers said in a Feb. 10 filing.

The case was brought by good-government groups and voters who say the lack of paper ballots undermines the voting process. U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg, an Obama nominee overseeing the case, was urged by CISA to reject attempts to release a rdacted version of Halderman’s report for now. 

CISA officials want to review the information in the report and help Dominion resolve the vulnerabilities identified before the report is released. [How can that be done? [Dominion doesn't want anyone looking inside their machines. Remember the voting machines were invented by three Venezuellans with the intent to steal elections.  - ED]

 They said they weren’t able to provide a date by which they’ll be finished. [You can bet it will be after the Nov 2024 election, if aver !. - ED]

Totenberg must weigh the request against the wishes of Georgia Secretary State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican and one of the defendants, who called in late January for the release to happen immediately.

John Poulos, Dominion’s CEO and president, said in a statement released by Raffensperger’s office that Halderman’s review lacked “a holistic approach,” adding that Dominion “supports all efforts to bring real facts and evidence forward to defend the integrity of our machines and the credibility of Georgia’s elections.” [Ha! Ha!. If you believe that I've got a bridge to sell you - ED].

Plaintiffs, including the Coalition for Good Governance, also support the release of the report, David Cross, one of their lawyers, confirmed to The Epoch Times.

 The plaintiffs said in a filing before a copy was sent to CISA that the agency should get a copy and begin its evaluation process, but that the evaluation “should not unreasonably delay the public disclosure of the report, which must be promptly disclosed to Georgia state and county election officials, and filed on the public docket, so that public officials can secure the upcoming May primary elections.”

They asked Totenberg to order them to file a redacted version of the report on the docket, which would make it accessible to the public, no later than March 4.

Related: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/cisa-now-warning-untimely-release-secret-audit-report-voting-machines-georgia/