Arizona 2020 vote audit finds election-shifting numbers of illegal ballots

by: Allen Williams


Well the results are finally in concerning the election audit of Maricopa county, Arizona. What relevance does a hand recount serve than to 'prove' the accuracy of the Dominion voting machine counting mechanism? This is media misdirection and not the central issue.  Of far more importance is the data anomalies identified in the audited ballots such as the findings by Dr. Shiva that demonstrate Over 17,000 Total Duplicate Ballots — Votes By Those Who Voted More Than Once in Arizona — 1.5 Times Biden’s

Biden's margin of victory in Arizona was only 10,457 votes but with the anomalies found in the number of legitimate voters, duplicate voters, underage and phantom voters, etc amount to 1.5 to nearly 6 times his margin of victory meaning the likelihood that 2020 voting results are accurate is out the window. This is akin to conducting a poll with a margin of error of (+/-) 50% where the margin of error overlaps the results.

Arizona audit: It’s the ballots stupid!, 57734 ballots with known issues, “the election should not be certified, and the reported results are not reliable”, Count part of not findings of audit - https://citizenwells.com/2021/09/26/arizona-audit-its-the-ballots-stupid-57734-ballots-with-known-issues-the-election-should-not-be-certified-and-the-reported-results-are-not-reliable-count-part-of-not-findings-of-audit/


Arizona 2020 vote audit finds potentially election-shiftingnumbers of illegal ballots

(THE FEDERALIST) – On Friday, the Arizona State Senate released the final reports on the results of the Maricopa County Forensic Election Audit. While the reports made several significant findings supporting former President Trump’s complaints about the 2020 election, the corporate media ignored those aspects of the audit to focus instead only on the results of the hand recount.

As broadly reported, the audit established “there were no substantial differences between the hand count of the ballots provided and the official canvass results for the County.” Maricopa County, which represents Arizona’s most populous county thanks to its county seat of Phoenix, had provided Biden a 45,000-vote advantage in the state, propelling Biden to a victory by 10,457 votes. So the media presented the recount as confirming Biden’s victory in the state.

Left unmentioned, however, were the numerous findings of problems with the election and, most significantly, evidence indicating tens of thousands of ballots were illegally cast or counted. A report entitled “Compliance with Election Laws and Procedures,” issued by Senate Audit Liaison Ken Bennett, highlighted several issues, of which two were particularly significant because of the number of votes involved.

Left unmentioned, however, were the numerous findings of problems with the election and, most significantly, evidence indicating tens of thousands of ballots were illegally cast or counted. A report entitled “Compliance with Election Laws and Procedures,” issued by Senate Audit Liaison Ken Bennett, highlighted several issues, of which two were particularly significant because of the number of votes involved.

So what is the Senate leadership doing to decertify the election? Why nothing of course other than endless pontificating, further investigations, more Bullshit rhetoric and gas bagging as they have allowed the county to defy their subpoenas regarding inspection of routers in the Dominion voting machines. Gives you real confidence in their ability to write any laws given the number of election laws already violated,eh? The hidden message here is that only the voting numbers count and it's irrelevant how you obtain them.  

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”…Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

Despite the preponderance of evidence of fraud in AZ the senate would rather let the county go down than to step up and do the right thing.

This is what happens to a country when a band of gas bag elites gain administrative authority over its citizens.










HUGE: Dr. Shiva Discovers Existence of the Secretive Long Fuse Report — Exposes Twitter-Government Collusion — As Momentous Discovery as Pentagon Papers



Dr. Shiva revealed how election officials and government actors work together to coordinate with social media platforms to silence speech in America.

Dr. Shiva described this discovery in his latest amended legal complaint filed on July 22.

This case is about the government surveilling and blacklisting a minority, political candidate Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai (“Dr. Shiva”), and then eventually silencing his speech, in the midst of his U.S. Senate campaign, because he criticized government officials, thereby violating his First Amendment rights – the foundational principle of the United States.

2. Starting in June of 2020, Dr. Shiva, a candidate for U.S. Senate in Massachusetts, was one of the top six (6) individuals in the United States who had been identified,in The Long Fuse Report, as an Influence Operator (IO) per the Playbooks (created by the Defendants), and was under 24/7 surveillance by teams working 4-hour shifts, using an infrastructure – of technology and relationships as shown in Exhibit A, coarchitected by the Defendants in this case. Dr. Shiva is mentioned twenty-two (22) times in The Long Fuse Report.




Dr. SHIVA’s Lawsuit To Show Government MADE Twitter Silence Political Speech

By Staff

A government private company relationship to marginalize and de platform individuals over first amendment speech is Fascism. These are the playbooks developed by Twitter to suppress opposing views to the state narrative:

All these referenced documents with links to their content are available here: https://vashiva.com/first-amendment-twitter-galvin-lawsuit/

From Dr Shiva's court filing at: Case 1:20-cv-11889-MLW Document 118 Filed 05/21/21 Page 1 of 7

Plaintiff has independently discovered the documentary evidence proving that Tassinari, Cohen, NASED and Twitter Legal jointly collaborated to design and build the core infrastructure, processes, and protocols enabling the Twitter Trusted Partnership Program and the Twitter Partner Support Portal (PSP).

In2017,Cohen and others began formulating and designing the framework for silently violating the free speech rights of US persons by first characterizing speakers as “Influence Operators” (IOs) thereby fabricating a sinister connotation where none exists, as the ideological frame work to justify canceling speakers who exercise their right to express their opinion.

All of these finally culminated in 2020 in the final manual for state officials called the Elections Influence Operations Playbook for State and Local Officials, for which Cohen and Twitter Legal are architects.This manual is split into three parts. The first two parts are available to the public.The third part is available only to state and local officials. Part1 provides the theoretical foundation for identifying and targeting “Influence Operators,”i.e. persons who accuse state election officials of corruption or make allegations that state elections may have violated Federal law.

When ever government enlists and dictates user behaviors that are NOT desired or dictates policies to view point discriminate is known as fascism.

In 2018, Amy Cohen, as Executive Director for NASED, testified to Congress about this emerging framework that she helped to formulate and architect in 2017, in cooperation with state officials and that they created a new centralized Governing Coordinating Council (GCC) that brought together both state and federal officials to create an electronic infrastructure for surveying speech and monitoring“ Influence Operators.”

So there we have an admission by the director of NASED that the avowed purpose of this 'energing framework' is to control free speech by de-platforming those defined as 'influence' operators.

"Bruce Lund, a senior member of In-Q-Tel’s technical staff, noted in a 2012 paper that “monitoring social media” is increasingly essential for government agencies seeking to keep track of “erupting political movements, crises, epidemics, and disasters, not to mention general global trends.” This statement necessarily infers that "erupting political movements" includes speech that opposes  government narratives.

The article continues:  “When you have private companies deciding which algorithms get you a so-called threat score, or make you a person of interest, there’s obviously room for targeting people based on viewpoints or even unlawfully targeting people based on race or religion,” said Lee Rowland, a senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union.

This is exactly what is happening with Twitter's de platforming of views that conflict with government political agenda narratives.












Massachusetts election fraud lawsuit by Dr. Shiva is the only surviving 2020 election challenge

Election Fraud Analysis..

Dr. Shiva's MA election fraud lawsuits still surviving dismissal. Watch the inventor of email lay out the case for his Massachusetts election returns fraud and the court admission by the MA Sec of state that election ballots were destroyed in violation of federal law in this Worldview New Report: https://www.worldviewweekend.com/tv/video/dr-shiva-election-fraud-fascism-and-loss-freedom-unless-americans-respond-correctly

Related:  HUGE BREAKING NEWS: Arizona Senate Republicans Courageously Announce Team Who Will Perform Maricopa County Election Audit and It’s Good News for America!