Evidence recorded by government white hat hackers in Mike Lindell's latest video "Absolute 9 -0' showing the data packets coming from China to flip votes in the Dominion voting machine internet connections (yes, the ones that suoosedly did not exist) that defined the 2020 election.
Watch the video here: https://lindelltv.com/mike-lindell-presents-absolutely-90/
We have shocking evidence related to the actors running the audit.
Stark was appointed by Speaker Pelosi in 2016 and Simons was appointed by former Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D) in 2008 and was re-affirmed by then-Senate Minority now Majority Leader Schumer.
Two of the three NH election auditors, therefore, Stark and Mark Lindeman, Ph.D., and co-director at Verified Voting, have direct ties and loyalty to the powerful American Democrat-progressive machine, at the very highest levels.
That deep state Democratic machine has a vested, hardcore political interest in maintaining the status quo of all 2020 state elections, including New Hampshire’s.
Finally, Harry Hursti, Ph.D., has obscured professional relationships with the other two auditors, to which he does have strong professional ties. Why?
This audit team, being driven by secretive, Democrat-socialist political interests, is anything but fair, impartial, and nonpartisan. Its agenda is not at all that of the NH patriots who fought for election honesty, transparency, and integrity.
Some history is critical. NH’s Diebold AccuVote OS voting machines are nationally infamous for being hackable and it was Harri Hursti, Ph.D., himself, as the invited computer scientist “hacker” who, back in December 2005, proved to the country that these Diebold memory cards could be easily hacked and manipulated to secretly change vote counts. He also demonstrated that his hacks were absolutely undetectable.
All Hursti did was take a Diebold, credit card-sized memory card, quickly pre-program it using an inexpensive, readily available agricultural scanning device, and stick it in the Diebold optical scanner. No keys or passwords were needed. His hack happened fast. This staged election in which the outcome was known by all, ended up with Hursti’s hacked memory card secretly deciding the “election,” and whose count reflected Hursti’s choice.
Hursti also affirmed that there were additional ways these Diebold memory cards and machines could be quickly hacked, he had simply demo’ed one of them.
Hursti figured out how to hack into the memory card … He learned how to hide votes, make losers out of winners and leave no trace, [Bev Harris] said.
This stunning moment in American history – after Diebold had repeatedly and aggressively maintained that its machines and memory cards were totally secure and trustworthy – was created and witnessed by, among others, election integrity advocate extraordinaire Bev Harris of the very ethical 501(c)(3) Black Box Voting (BBV), the ethical and patriotic Ion Sancho, Leon County, Florida Supervisor of Elections, and Susan Pynchon of the Florida Fair Elections Coalition.
This was such a stunning and groundbreaking moment in American election integrity history that it came to be referred to as the Hursti Hack. Harris memorialized it by co-producing a riveting 2006 documentary called Hacking Democracy.
You can watch a clip from that documentary, the actual Hursti Hack, right here.
Hursti’s own testimony about NH’s Diebold AccuVote OS machines and memory cards, given at NH House Election Law Committee hearings on September 19, 2007, confirmed his professional opinion that these machines and memory cards are untrustworthy:
If you are believing on poll tape that doesn’t mean a thing because I can control the whole thing over whatever logic and accuracy that you perform just before the election. Because I have control. I can compare the date, the time. And so in order to be producing fraudulent tape, I will be producing fraudulent tape only on Tuesday evening. And I don’t worry about what ballots go through.
Therefore, back in 2007, the Diebold machines and memory cards that Hursti boasted about being able to secretly control, are the same ones Lindeman, Hursti, and Stark were all supposed to audit.
The cold, hard facts are that an audit of these machines and especially their memory cards is an entirely useless activity, and Hursti showed why 16 years ago. Yet why are Lindeman (who is not even a computer scientist, he has a Ph.D. in political science) and especially Hursti, the two now sans Stark, claiming they will need “90 minutes to read” each card?
Hursti agreeing to “audit” these Diebold memory cards, given his national exposure of their egregious built-in flaws, is indefensible, suspicious and you now have to wonder, just what is his real agenda? Also, why, did Verified Voting appear to disappear evidence of Hursti’s seat upon its advisory board?
VV’s current webpage shows he is not a member. However, the Internet Archive tells a very different story. As of April 29, Hursti is shown as being a member. On May 3, the NH AG and SoS hired him to be a member of their audit team. Two days later, on May 5, any evidence of Hursti’s participation as an advisor with Verified Voting had been deleted.
Philip Stark, whom Hursti and Lindeman co-selected as the third auditor, either employed Philip Stark, contracted with him, or has had some sort of close professional relationship with him since mid-2018. Hursti co-founded Nordic Innovation Labs, which conducts Security Assessment & Vulnerability Consulting. On the business’s About Us page, Stark is one of three Nordic Network team members. Sometime after February 26, 2021, Stark’s name and bio were removed from that webpage.
The three of these auditors, rather than being a professional, independently-functioning group of auditors – an impression which everyone involved tried hard to create – are actually not that at all.
As far as these computer scientists go, it certainly does appear that yet another entity, another profession that works with, and has influence upon our American election infrastructure has been infiltrated and compromised.
By Jim Hoft
Attorney Matthew DePerno is back in court on Monday.
Attorney Matthew DePerno filed his latest finding in the Circuit Court for Antrim County on Friday.
According to DePerno, there were 1,061 “phantom” ballots found in Antrim County during the 2020 election.
Attorney DePerno also contends there was nearly 100% turnout between ages 65 and 80 in the county despite the threat of the coronavirus.
New discoveries
and filings today:
(1) 1,061 phantom ballots discovered in Antrim
(2) nearly 100% turnout between ages 65 and 80
(3) 20.3% of all ballots sent to PO boxeshttps://t.co/IYzEsT5E7d
— Matthew S. DePerno, Esq. (@mdeperno) May 8, 2021
DePerno explains that in the
December hand recount of Antrim county, there was a total of 15,952 ballots
counted; however, Secretary of State Benson’s official database only had 14,901
ballots which means there exists 1,061 extra ballots not on the voter rolls,
i.e., “phantom” ballots.
Phantom ballots could explain what happened at the hand recount in December when volunteers were told to count approximately 138 ballots with the very same signature. Despite their repeated objections and attempts to challenge the problem ballots, the Secretary of State official said, “That’s not your role at this very moment” and pushed the volunteers to count the ballots and finish the audit.
MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell announced today that his company, MyPillow, will sue Dominion Voting Systems for $1.6 billion. Lindell made this announcement during the official launch of his new social media platform, Frank Speech.
Dominion filed a lawsuit against Lindell for $1.3 billion in February, alleging defamation from Lindell accusing the voting company of election fraud. Lindell previously announced on Steve Bannon’s War Room: Pandemic podcast that he had planned to retaliate legally against Dominion for their violation of Americans’ First Amendment rights. “You’re also going to have MyPillow going after Dominion in a counter suit and that’s going to your First Amendment speech,” Lindell said.
Update: Some excerpts from the Lindell Legal filing documents (Source LindelTV.com), not sequential but rather significance:
