Cyber Forensics Symposium Aug, 10, 11 & 12 Live on Lindelltv.com
ATOM BOMB: Expert Cyber Team CONFIRMS Votes Can Be Altered From Overseas in Run-Up to Lindell Symposium
News Media, Govt. Officials from (Update: 9/5/21 30 now 41) states (aiming for all 50),
and 1100 80 cyber experts from the US and around the world will dissect and report on
the 2020 election P-caps recorded by Patriots the night of November
3rd.
The experts will translate the raw P-cap data from the 2020 election and participants can select any state at random and see the REAL votes the candidates actually received on Nov. 3rd.
Mike Lindell (mypillow.com) is offering a 5 million prize if any of the cyber experts can show the p-cap information presented is either not for the 2020 election results or that it is false data.
Pennsylvania: Over 120,000 unreconciled votes. 15,000 mail-in ballots sent out of state. 1,823,148 mail-in ballots were sent out and 2,589,242 were sent back. 21,000 confirmed dead voters. Over 300,000 voter registrations removed from the SURE system after November 3. Canvassing effort in Montgomery County found 78,000 phantom votes
by Audit the Vote PA ( https://www.auditthevotepa.com/)
Pennsylvania Demands Election Integrity.. Expose The Fraud
Over 120,000 unreconciled votes:15,000 mail-in ballots sent out of state
1,823,148 mail-in ballots were sent out and 2,589,242 were sent back
21,000 confirmed dead voters
Over 300,000 voter registrations removed from the SURE system after November 3
Canvassing effort in Montgomery County found 78,000 phantom votes
Over 10,000 people voted by mail whose ID doesn’t exist in the SURE system
Over 29,000 Duplicate Registrations
7,857 Registrations whose DOB changed in 2020
55,823 voters back filled into the SURE system
4,458 voters whose registration date changed in 2020
1,059,547 Voters whose only vote on record was the 2020 election
By Staff
A government private company relationship to marginalize and de platform individuals over first amendment speech is Fascism. These are the playbooks developed by Twitter to suppress opposing views to the state narrative:
From Dr Shiva's court filing at: Case 1:20-cv-11889-MLW Document 118 Filed 05/21/21 Page 1 of 7
Plaintiff has independently discovered
the documentary evidence
proving that Tassinari,
Cohen, NASED and
Twitter Legal jointly
collaborated to design
and build the
core infrastructure, processes,
and protocols enabling the
Twitter Trusted Partnership
Program and the
Twitter Partner Support
Portal (PSP).
In2017,Cohen
and others began
formulating and designing
the framework for
silently violating the
free speech rights
of US persons
by first characterizing speakers
as “Influence Operators”
(IOs) thereby fabricating a sinister
connotation where
none exists, as
the ideological frame work
to justify canceling
speakers who exercise
their right to
express their opinion.
All of these finally culminated in 2020 in the final manual for state officials called the Elections Influence Operations Playbook for State and Local Officials, for which Cohen and Twitter Legal are architects.This manual is split into three parts. The first two parts are available to the public.The third part is available only to state and local officials. Part1 provides the theoretical foundation for identifying and targeting “Influence Operators,”i.e. persons who accuse state election officials of corruption or make allegations that state elections may have violated Federal law.
When ever government enlists and dictates user behaviors that are NOT desired or dictates policies to view point discriminate is known as fascism.
In 2018, Amy Cohen, as Executive Director for NASED, testified to Congress about this emerging framework that she helped to formulate and architect in 2017, in cooperation with state officials and that they created a new centralized Governing Coordinating Council (GCC) that brought together both state and federal officials to create an electronic infrastructure for surveying speech and monitoring“ Influence Operators.”
So there we have an admission by the director of NASED that the avowed purpose of this 'energing framework' is to control free speech by de-platforming those defined as 'influence' operators.
"Bruce Lund, a senior member of In-Q-Tel’s technical staff, noted in a 2012 paper
that “monitoring social media” is increasingly essential for government
agencies seeking to keep track of “erupting political movements,
crises, epidemics, and disasters, not to mention general global trends.” This statement necessarily infers that "erupting political movements" includes speech that opposes government narratives.
The article continues: “When you have private companies deciding which algorithms get you a so-called threat score, or make you a person of interest, there’s obviously room for targeting people based on viewpoints or even unlawfully targeting people based on race or religion,” said Lee Rowland, a senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union.
This is exactly what is happening with Twitter's de platforming of views that conflict with government political agenda narratives.