It’s in the ballots. Now the printers of the ballots are in
the hot seat. They better lawyer up. It appears that ballots in
Republican areas were printed differently than in Democrat areas which
caused more Republican ballots to go to adjudication and be recorded as
Biden votes.
We reported in December that inventor and data expert, Jovan Hutton
Pulitzer identified a pattern in Georgia where Republican district
ballots were printed differently than Democrat district ballots. The
Republican areas’ ballots were set up where a large percentage would go
to adjudication. This allowed unknown individuals to record all the
ballots for Biden.
Yesterday this same situation was discussed on Steve Bannon’s WarRoom
Pandemic. In Antrim County, Michigan attorney Matt DePerno provided a double-bombshell update to his case
relating to that county’s November 3, 2020 election and its voting
machines and ballots from Dominion Voting Systems.
On December 4, 2020,
DePerno, on behalf of his client, William Bailey, successfully received a
court’s permission to forensically audit the county’s Dominion machines
used in the November 3, 2020, Antrim County elections.
DePerno had to fight off legal attempts to stop the public disclosure of this data, from both the radicalized Michigan Attorney General, Dana Nessel (D), and the Soros-backed dishonest and equally radical Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson (D). Nessel filed a lawsuit, which Benson signed onto, to stop the release of this information!
On December 13, the night before DePerno’s emergency hearing to get permission to release his forensic auditors’ report, AG Nessel tweeted a warning shot directed specifically at “Lawyers who practice in Michigan,” letting them know that their oath prevents them from filing “unjust and/or frivolous actions” or from misleading the court.
DePerno was granted permission by the court at an emergency hearing on December 14 to release the findings of that report.
DePerno’s audit team, the Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG),
uncovered and exposed, among other things, that the Dominion voting
machines used in that 2020 election were set at a 68.05% error rate, when the allowable election error rate is .0008%! These “error’ed ballots” were forced out of the counting system and into the adjudication – manual review – by an individual who
decides which candidates the ballots report as voting for. The
Dominion system does NOT record who made the decision and when and does
NOT mandate that at least two individuals sign off on the decision, one
from each major party.
On May 18, as reported by UncoverDC, Bailey and DePerno’s case was dismissed by the court:
Judge Elsenheimer dismissed [DePerno’s] client’s case
yesterday with a ruling based on what DePerno says is a ‘narrow
decision’ that had nothing to do with any of the evidence he and his
client, Bill Bailey, have presented.
In another, May 18 exclusive interview
with Jim Hoft, Patty McMurray, and conservative Michigan Republican
activist Matt Seely, Matt DePerno expressed his resolve to appeal this
decision.
Yesterday, Matt DePerno gave two shocking updates about this case,
one relating to an anonymous user accessing the Election Management
System remotely and changing data – proving there was internet access
– and the other about newly uncovered data relating to the actual
printed ballots used in the Antrim County 2020 election. He reported
that the printing of the actual Dominion paper ballots appears to have been “intentionally modified” so that 20% of Republican votes were not counted!
DePerno explained to Steve Bannon:
Two things we put out late last evening, two new reports that
came out. One shows that there was, we’ve proved now that there was
direct access to the Antrim County Election Management System, because
we show on November 5, we can see it in the forensic images, that an
anonymous user logged onto the EMS remotely with escalated privileges
and made changes to the database, when they were trying to re-tabulate
the election.
So, that’s one huge, huge development because now we prove that
the machines were remotely accessed and, more importantly, they were
remotely accessed by an anonymous user who had elevated privileges in
the system.
That is pretty damning for the non-forensic reviewers out there or people who do not want a forensic audit. [my emphasis]
And the other thing, probably as equally as explosive. Everyone’s seen ballots before, like these ballots here [waves a paper ballot].
On the side of the ballot, there’s these black boxes, there’s 59 black
boxes on the side of the ballot. We now see within the forensic images
that in Antrim County those blocks, blocks 15, 18, 28, 41 and 44, were
all intentionally modified, the height and the width, the shape of the
blocks were intentionally modified in order to generate errors.
What does an error do? In this case by modifying those specific
blocks, they were able to cause rejections for Republican ballots,
meaning if you voted for Donald Trump and then put your ballot in the
machine, your ballot was rejected at a rate of 20% more than Joe Biden
ballots.
DePerno is actively encouraging Michigan citizens and voters to sign an affidavit (here) he will be placing up on his website today, already signed by 3,500 Michiganders, demanding that a full forensic audit be conducted throughout the entire state of Michigan.
To support Matthew DePerno and his continued efforts to fight for election integrity, go to: DePernoLaw.com and donate to his legal defense fund. See Deperno’s discussion with Steve Bannon yesterday:
Finally, the layout of the ballot is a big deal and the auditors in
Arizona know it. They are not only recounting all ballots from Maricopa
County’s results in the 2020 Presidential and Senate elections, they are
also reviewing the ballots’ layout and measuring for discrepancies.
If these ballots are out of sync and we find they are out of sync in
Republican precincts only, then we have another example where the
printing of the ballots is in error and therefore in question.
What are the odds that this all happened randomly? We all know the answer to that.
The teamwork and activism of NH patriots, who fought hard to
get the NH audit off the ground, have been actively subverted and
sabotaged without their knowledge.
We have shocking evidence related to the actors running the audit.
It appears very likely that the course of this audit has been quietly
steered by top Democratic leadership in the U.S. Congress, House SpeakerNancy Pelosi (D) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D), through the auditors themselves. Both Philip Stark, Ph.D. and Barbara Simons, Ph.D., the board chair of Verified Voting and also a member of George Soros’ elite Democracy Alliance Board, are current appointees to the corrupt and powerful U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC).
Stark was appointed by Speaker Pelosi in 2016 and Simons was
appointed by former Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D) in 2008 and
was re-affirmed by then-Senate Minority now Majority Leader Schumer.
Two of the three NH election auditors, therefore, Stark and Mark Lindeman, Ph.D., and co-director at Verified Voting, have direct ties and loyalty to the powerful American Democrat-progressive machine, at the very highest levels.
That deep state Democratic machine has a vested, hardcore political
interest in maintaining the status quo of all 2020 state elections,
including New Hampshire’s.
Finally, Harry Hursti, Ph.D., has obscured professional relationships with the other two auditors, to which he does have strong professional ties. Why?
This audit team, being driven by secretive,
Democrat-socialist political interests, is anything but fair, impartial,
and nonpartisan. Its agenda is not at all that of the NH patriots who
fought for election honesty, transparency, and integrity.
Some history is critical. NH’s Diebold AccuVote OS voting machines are nationally infamous for being hackable and it was Harri Hursti, Ph.D., himself, as the invited computer scientist “hacker” who, back in December 2005, proved to
the country that these Diebold memory cards could be easily hacked and
manipulated to secretly change vote counts. He also demonstrated that
his hacks were absolutely undetectable.
All Hursti did was take a Diebold, credit card-sized memory card,
quickly pre-program it using an inexpensive, readily available
agricultural scanning device, and stick it in the Diebold optical
scanner. No keys or passwords were needed. His hack happened fast. This
staged election in which the outcome was known by all, ended up with
Hursti’s hacked memory card secretly deciding the “election,” and whose
count reflected Hursti’s choice.
Hursti also affirmed that there were additional ways these Diebold memory cards and machines could be quickly hacked, he had simply demo’ed one of them.
Hursti figured out how to hack into the memory card … He learned
how to hide votes, make losers out of winners and leave no trace, [Bev
Harris] said.
This stunning moment in American history – after Diebold had
repeatedly and aggressively maintained that its machines and memory
cards were totally secure and trustworthy – was created and witnessed
by, among others, election integrity advocate extraordinaire Bev Harris
of the very ethical 501(c)(3) Black Box Voting (BBV), the ethical and patriotic Ion Sancho, Leon County, Florida Supervisor of Elections, and Susan Pynchon of the Florida Fair Elections Coalition.
This was such a stunning and groundbreaking moment in American election integrity history that it came to be referred to as the Hursti Hack. Harris memorialized it by co-producing a riveting 2006 documentary calledHacking Democracy.
You can watch a clip from that documentary, the actual Hursti Hack, right here.
Diebold Election Systems, for those who don’t know your election machine
history, acquired Global Election Systems in 2002 and, strategically,
changed its name in 2007 to Premier Election Solutions, which was
eventually partially purchased, in 2010, by a company called Dominion Voting Systems. Dominion is, of course, the very same company
whose machines are being forensically audited in Maricopa County,
Arizona, and which were used, statewide, by Georgia in the 2020
election.
According to Harris, “Following the Florida demonstration, New Hampshire chose to purchase the voting machine make and model that Hursti had proven to be tamperable.”
Hursti’s own testimony
about NH’s Diebold AccuVote OS machines and memory cards, given at NH
House Election Law Committee hearings on September 19, 2007, confirmed
his professional opinion that these machines and memory cards are
untrustworthy:
If you are believing on poll tape that doesn’t mean a thing because I can control the whole thing over whatever logic and accuracy that you perform just before the election.
Because I have control. I can compare the date, the time. And so in
order to be producing fraudulent tape, I will be producing fraudulent
tape only on Tuesday evening. And I don’t worry about what ballots go
through.
Therefore, back in 2007, the Diebold machines and memory cards that Hursti boasted about being able to secretly control, are the same ones Lindeman, Hursti, and Stark were all supposed to audit.
The cold, hard facts are that an audit of these machines and
especially their memory cards is an entirely useless activity, and
Hursti showed why 16 years ago. Yet why are Lindeman (who is not even a computer scientist, he has a Ph.D. in political science) and especially Hursti, the two now sans Stark, claiming they will need “90 minutes to read” each card?
Hursti agreeing to “audit” these Diebold memory cards, given his
national exposure of their egregious built-in flaws, is indefensible,
suspicious and you now have to wonder, just what is his real agenda?
Also, why, did Verified Voting appear to disappear evidence of Hursti’s seat upon its advisory board?
Philip Stark, whom Hursti and Lindeman co-selected as the third
auditor, either employed Philip Stark, contracted with him, or has had
some sort of close professional relationship with him since mid-2018.
Hursti co-founded Nordic Innovation Labs, which conducts Security Assessment & Vulnerability Consulting. On the business’s About Us page, Stark is one of three Nordic Network team members. Sometime after February 26, 2021, Stark’s name and bio were removed from that webpage.
The three of these auditors, rather than being a professional,
independently-functioning group of auditors – an impression which
everyone involved tried hard to create – are actually not that at all.
As far as these computer scientists go, it certainly does
appear that yet another entity, another profession that works with, and
has influence upon our American election infrastructure has been
infiltrated and compromised.
This certainly aligns directly with the goals of top
progressive Democrat leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, who
appointed Dr. Philip Stark and Dr. Barbara Simons to positions of great
power and influence upon the U.S. EAC, and who are now observing the
fruits of their labor in New Hampshire.
Yesterday, we reported about the hearing in the Antrim County, MI, voter
fraud case, where Judge Kevin J. Elsenheimer heard arguments from Erik
Grill, Assistant Attorney General, to the radical Attorney General Dana
Nessel, representing MI Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, and Antrim
County Attorney and Chair of the Grand Traverse Republican Party, Haider
Kazim, who were both fighting to dismiss the election fraud lawsuit.
Constitutional Attorney Matt Deperno of DePerno Law, who represents the
plaintiff, William Bailey, has been fighting to expand the case.
100 Percent Fed Up
reports – In March, Attorney Matt DePerno subpoenaed 8 clerks in key
counties in Michigan: Barry, Charlevoix, Grand Traverse, Kent,
Livingston, Macomb, Oakland, and Wayne. In his subpoenas, DePerno asked
to have access to their poll tapes, ballots, logs, tally servers,
election management servers, election media, spreadsheets, and canvasser
notes from the 2020 election. The judge denied their requests after all
8 counties filed motions to quash his request. In Grand Traverse
County, Haider Kazim and Michigan’s dishonest Democrat Secretary of
State filed a joint motion to quash DePerno’s request.
In our previous report, we asked why the Grand Traverse Republican Party
chair would be fighting so hard in court to stop the investigation into
voter fraud in Antrim County? We asked what could possibly be in it for
Mr. Hazim to stop the voter fraud case from moving forward?
Less than 24 hours after we outed Mr. Kazim’s seemingly duplicitous
role as the Chair of the Grand Traverse County Republican Party and the
attorney fighting have the voter fraud case in Antrim County
dismissed—Mr. Kazim withdrew from the case.