by Oliver North and David Goetsch
Hunter Biden's "take" from Russia while his father was vice president was reportedly at least $3.5 million, for which he did nothing but be Joe Biden's son. Now, Joe Biden is president of the United States and is directly accusing Russian President Vladimir Putin of war crimes and genocide in Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The possibility of blackmail is undeniable.
Hunter Biden never provided any substantive service to his foreign patrons. He was widely known to be a spoiled, profligate son of privilege. All Hunter Biden ever peddled to China, Russia and Ukraine was access to his father, then vice president of the U.S. Hunter not only compromised his father but set him up for blackmail.
Now, as president, Joe Biden is in the unenviable position of having to stand up to two enemies -- Russia and China -- who likely have evidence damaging to his presidency. Neither Russia nor China have yet publicly released information damning to Joe Biden. This may be because they want him -- hapless, easily manipulated and cognitively challenged -- right where he is: in the White House. His replacement, Vice President Kamala Harris, could be even more difficult to control.
There already appears to be sufficient evidence against Hunter Biden to convict him of what is likely to be illegal influence peddling -- but what about Joe? Did Joe Biden use his position as vice president to arrange lucrative business deals for his hapless, drug abusing, sex-addicted son? Is our president compromised by his actions on behalf of Hunter and his brother James?
The mainstream media refuses to acknowledge the elephant in the room: Was Joe Biden actually part of Hunter's deals? Is he the "big guy" mentioned in the now infamous email of May 13, 2017, authored by James Gilliar of the international consulting firm J2cR? This email contains a line that may eventually open the Pandora's box of "Bidengate." It reads: "10 held by H for the big guy?" There is little doubt the "H" mentioned in the May 13 email is Hunter and the "10" refers to $10 million. It is difficult to draw any conclusion other than the "big guy" is Joe Biden.
by Kane
“A federal judge in Florida has voided the national mask mandate covering airports, planes and other public travel,” the Associated Press reported on Monday. “The decision Monday by U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle in Tampa also said the CDC failed to justify its decision and did not follow proper rulemaking.”
Southwest Airlines CEO on masks:
— The First (@TheFirstonTV) December 16, 2021
"Masks don't add much, if anything." pic.twitter.com/WeTkYGlRS3
by Madison McQueen
Since Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 presidential election, migrants have been flooding to the border in hopes of taking advantage of his immigration policy promises. The President has taken a sharp turn away from the approach of his predecessor. Instead of instituting policies that deter illegal immigration, this administration is posting a giant welcome sign. And, unfortunately for the American public, it’s working.
Moreover, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, about 10 million Americans are still unemployed as of February of this year. As the United States continues to recover from the economic impact of the pandemic, it makes no sense to reduce the chances of employment for Americans by increasing immigration.[iv]
Blame for the current border crisis lies solely on the shoulders of President Biden and his administration. As the aforementioned figures show, apprehensions did not drastically rise until after his election. Listed below are some examples of this administration’s worst policy changes which have caused the current crisis at the southern border.
1. The Promise of Amnesty
One of the pillars of Biden’s campaign was to amnesty 11 million illegal aliens in the United States, and provide a roadmap to citizenship.[v] However, by FAIR’s estimate, there are 14.5 million illegal aliens presently in the country.[vi] So, this amnesty would allow for more than 14 million illegal aliens to gain lawful status and openly compete for jobs in a market that is still struggling from the economic impacts of the COVID-19 lockdowns.
In addition to drawing masses of amnesty hopefuls to the southern border, a move of this size would drastically increase legal immigration over time, with potentially more than 43 million new immigrants eventually entering the country through chain migration.[vii]
Additionally, the costs to American taxpayers would rise
exponentially as most amnestied illegal aliens would qualify for state
and federal welfare programs. Based on FAIR’s comprehensive fiscal cost study in 2017, illegal aliens impose a net burden of at least $133.7 billion annually.[viii] Those costs would only worsen, and at a time when the economy is still trying to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, Americans should not be expected to bear that fiscal burden.
President Biden ended construction on the border wall on his first day in office.[ix] The Trump administration had previously completed nearly 460 miles of new border wall and had contracts in place for an additional 300 miles.
In some areas, high-speed roadways had already been completed as a part of the border wall system, but the physical barrier had yet to be built. Because of this, halting the construction created a smuggler’s highway. [x]
In areas with a completed barrier, the border wall has proven effective in deterring illegal crossings and cartel activity.[xi] It also increased apprehension rates as illegal activity was forced through ports of entry rather than rough terrain.
Halting construction not only invites more illegal activity along the border, but it also forfeits billions in taxpayer dollars and impacts the lives of Americans.
The Biden administration ended the Migrant Protection Protocols, or “Remain in Mexico” policy.[xiii] President Trump instituted MPP in the spring of 2019 to combat a humanitarian and security crisis that was occurring at the southern border. The policy required anyone who arrived at the border claiming asylum to wait in Mexico until their court proceedings. This eliminated much of the fraud and loopholes in the asylum system. However, since President Biden ended the MPP, migrants can once again come to the border, claim asylum, and gain entry into the United States, often disappearing into the interior of the country.
The administration also dismantled the “Safe Third Country” or Asylum Cooperation Arrangements (ACA) with the Northern Triangle governments of El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala.[xiv] Under those agreements, migrants of those three nations had to apply for asylum in a directly neighboring country if it were safe to do so. This initiative curbed the number of meritless asylum seekers overwhelming the United States’ southern border. Considering that the vast majority of Central American migrants leave their home countries for purely economic reasons, not the legally-permissible parameters for claiming asylum (fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, and/or membership in a particular social group or political opinion), this tool effectively stopped migrants from “asylum shopping” their way to the U.S.[xv]
4. Reinstating the Obama-era Catch and Release Policy
The administration also reinstituted the catch and release policy previously suspended by President Trump.[xvii] The policy releases most recently apprehended migrants into U.S. cities along the border, thereby increasing the illegal alien population by thousands every day. This greatly incentivizes illegal immigration because migrants know that there is little chance of deportation if they get caught.
The catch and release policy has also created problems for border communities in south Texas. Mayor Pete Saenz (D) of Laredo expressed concern over the crisis unfolding in his community, saying, “The point here being, is that we need to prevent this journey from those countries to the border. It’s less risk [to] life, and limb and money, and so on to these folks. But also, to the community…” [xviii]
Migrants released into border towns as they wait for their immigration court dates have strained these cities and towns’ available resources. Mayor Bruno Lozano (D) of Del Rio did not mince words when describing the critical situation his city faces of not having enough resources or housing for the scores of migrants staying in Del Rio. Mayor Lozano said, “I am pleading and requesting with you to please put a halt to any measures regarding the release of immigrants awaiting court dates into the City of Del Rio and surrounding areas. We do not have the resources available to house and accommodate these migrants within our community.”[xix]
Texas Governor Greg Abbott (R) has also joined his fellow officeholders to address the Biden administration’s disastrous immigration policies. The Texas governor said, “The crisis at our southern border continues to escalate because of Biden Administration policies that refuse to secure the border and invite illegal immigration.” He continued, “Texas supports legal immigration but will not be an accomplice to the open border policies that cause, rather than prevent, a humanitarian crisis in our state and endanger the lives of Texans. We will surge the resources and law enforcement personnel needed to confront this crisis.”[xx]
The rise of illegal border crossings has prompted Governor Abbott to
enlist several law enforcement agencies and the Texas National Guard to
slow the flow of unchecked migration into his state. This border crisis
has garnered concern from elected officials from both political parties.
Under the Biden administration, many interior immigration enforcement and border security agencies have received orders to scale back arrests, deportations, and general border security. For instance, many CBP agents have been ordered to stop patrolling the U.S.-Mexico border for unlawful entries and external threats, and instead administer the transfer of families and unaccompanied minors to detention facilities.[xxi] The COVID-19 pandemic has led to capacity limitation at detention facilities, so border agents must create make-shift camps to house apprehended migrants.
In terms of interior enforcement, the administration issued a memorandum in January of this year that limits the arrest and removal authority of Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE) agents.[xxii] The directive bars ICE agents from detaining and subsequently deporting most illegal aliens, including many who have committed crimes beyond illegal entry.[xxiii] This change in deportation policy, coupled with a newly de-secured border, individuals with criminal records are seeing this policy change as an invitation to enter into the United States’ illegally. For example, the San Diego Border Patrol says they are on pace to apprehend a record number of convicted sex offenders along the border this year.[xxiv]
What Others are Saying About the Biden Border Crisis
Many border states and jurisdictions are feeling the repercussions of these reckless policy actions by the Biden administration:
- “The crisis at our southern border continues to escalate because of
Biden Administration policies that refuse to secure the border and
invite illegal immigration.” - Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas
- “[Illegal aliens] are paying $6,000 to come into our country, [then they’re] taken to communities throughout the U.S.
and exploited by the cartels. This is what the mainstream media’s not
putting out there right now. The cartels are smiling thanks to this
administration.” – Sheriff Mark Dannels, Chochise County, Arizona
- “Sometimes, unfortunately seemingly ‘compassionate’ decisions made by the federal government, or federal courts for that matter, have resulted in the mass migration of woman and children to Texas. And when that happens, it overwhelms Border Patrol immediately. The cartels are leveraging those gaps… When [women and children] are brought across, they are preyed upon by individuals amongst the smugglers, by the cartel operatives and others.” – Andrea Sparks, Director, Child Sex Trafficking Team for the State of Texas
Even members of his own political party are criticizing his approach toward the crisis:
- “Any president should come down [and] really spend time with border
communities… They didn’t talk to anybody, not even members of Congress
down here.” – Rep Henry Cuellar (D-TX)
- “I am pleading and requesting with you to please put a halt to any measures regarding the release of immigrants awaiting court dates into the City of Del Rio and surrounding areas. We do not have the resources available to house and accommodate these migrants within our community.” – Democrat Mayor Bruno Lozano, Del Rio
Despite these pleas, the Biden administration refuses to acknowledge the crisis at our border:
- “The answer is no. I think there is a challenge at the border that
we are managing, and we have our resources dedicated to managing
it.” Alejandro Mayorkas, DHS Secretary
While the situation at the border is dire, it would immediately begin improving if the Biden administration would simply rescind his worst executive orders regarding immigration, and institute several new common-sense reforms. Below is a short list of policy changes that could be enacted at the executive level to immediately alleviate the crisis created by the current administration:
- Reinstate Title 42 COVID border
restrictions for all inadmissible aliens arriving at any place along our
borders, regardless of age. Prosecute all illegal border crossers.
- Require those seeking asylum to make their claim in the first safe
nation they reach; make asylum-seekers remain in Mexico as their claim
is immediately heard without appeal.
- Reinstate agreements with all Northern Triangle nations to accept and protect asylum seekers near the home country.
- Ensure all families here illegally are reunited safely in their home country, not in the United States.
- Free up ICE to do its job; remove arbitrary limitations on who may be arrested for removal.
- Immediately stop all discussions and proposals regarding amnesty, which encourages human smuggling and trafficking.
Conclusion
All of these actions taken by the Biden administration are directly to blame for the crisis along the southern border. Each policy and promise further incentivizes illegal immigration. The administration has touted a promise of open borders, citizenship, and work permits for all throughout their campaign. So, it should come as no surprise that hundreds of thousands of migrants have already tried to enter the U.S. in hopes to take advantage of these promises. And there is no doubt that thousands more will continue to do the same in the coming months.
President Biden must reverse course on his immigration agenda if he wishes to properly serve the interests of the American people. He can begin that by admitting it was a mistake to dismantle interior enforcement and border security and restore the tried-and-true policies that helped stem the border crisis in 2019. Beyond that, he must show American citizens that they are his top priority by focusing on social and economic initiatives that benefit those who are legally allowed to be in this country, and de-incentivize illegal immigration.
This is some really scary stuff, just watch the violence these Trump supporters unleashed on the capitol on the 6th,
It’s a wonder anyone survived the devastation.