by Jonathan Turley
Attorney General Merrick Garland continued to refuse to address
questions over his refusal to appoint a Special Counsel in the Hunter
Biden investigation despite new evidence tying President Joe Biden to
the controversial business deals. The New York Post is reporting
that President Biden agreed to cover more than $800,000 in bills of
Hunter, including legal fees tied to the foreign deals. While President
Biden’s denial of knowledge of Hunter’s deals has been repeatedly contradicted (including by Hunter himself), White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki declared
that President Biden stands by his denials. However, she declined to
explain new information showing that a key business partner in these
deals visited the White House over a dozen times, including at least one
meeting with then Vice President Biden.
The New York Post shows that on Jan. 17, 2019, Hunter Biden’s
then-personal assistant, Katie Dodge told accountant Linda Shapero that
Joe Biden was covering the legal costs. The email states “I spoke with
Hunter today regarding his bills. It is my understanding that Hunt’s dad
will cover these bills in the short-term as Hunter transitions in his
career.”
[America's two tier Justice system. A different set of rules depending on who you are, aptly depicted by the following two cases (1) you're a globalist elite above the law OR (2) An ordinary Joe who gets hammered for his indiscressions. - ED]
What may be even more damaging is the the
new disclosure
that Hunter Biden’s business partner, Eric Schwerin, made at least 19
visits to the White House and other official locations between 2009 and
2015. Schwerin was the president of Rosemont Seneca, one of the key
firms involved in the alleged influence peddling schemes.
We have previously discussed the various references to the President
in these emails. Indeed, it is impossible to look into these allegations
of influence peddling without repeatedly running into references to the
President.
As vice president, Joe Biden flew to China on Air Force Two with Hunter Biden, who arranged for his father to meet some of his business interests. Hunter Biden’s financial interest in a Chinese-backed investment firm, BHR Partners, was registered within weeks of that 2013 trip.
There are emails of Ukrainian and other foreign clients thanking Hunter Biden for arranging meetings with his father. There are photos from dinners and meetings that tie President Biden to these figures, including a 2015 dinner with a group of Hunter Biden’s Russian and Kazakh clients.
People apparently were told to avoid directly referring to President Biden. In one email, Tony Bobulinski, then a business partner of Hunter’s, was instructed by Biden associate
James Gilliar not to speak of the former veep’s connection to any
transactions: “Don’t mention Joe being involved, it’s only when u [sic]
are face to face, I know u [sic] know that but they are paranoid.”
Instead, the emails apparently refer to President Biden with code names such as “Celtic” or “the big guy.” In one, “the big guy” is discussed as possibly receiving a 10 percent cut on a deal with a Chinese energy firm; other emails reportedly refer to Hunter Biden paying portions of his father’s expenses and taxes.
There were other connections like an office arranged for Joe Biden by
the Chinese, a letter of recommendation written by Joe Biden for a key
Chinese figure’s child, and expenses paid out of joint accounts.
President Biden has long insisted that that his son did “
nothing wrong.” That
is obviously untrue. One can argue over whether Hunter committed any
crime, but few would say that there is nothing wrong with raw influence
peddling worth millions with foreign entities. The public has a
legitimate reason to know whether the President or his family ran an
influence peddling operation worth millions.
Given this mounting evidence, the position of Attorney General Garland
has gone from dubious to ridiculous in evading the issue of a special
counsel appointment. He continues to
refuse to acknowledge these conflicts
with the President. In a hearing yesterday, Garland again refused to
address the issue, even discussing what it would take to warrant the
appointment of a special counsel. There is no reason why he cannot
answer such legal questions without getting into the evidence produced
in Delaware.
Federal regulations allow the appointment of a
special counsel when
it is in the public interest and an “investigation or prosecution of
that person or matter by a United States Attorney’s Office or litigating
Division of the Department of Justice would present a conflict of
interest for the Department or other extraordinary circumstances.”
It is hard to imagine a stronger case for the appointment of a special counsel. [It's really NOT in the interests of the globalists who contol the majority of US agencies, the judiciary and of course Congress. It's 'Pay for Play' at it's finest and they will block all attempts to stop it just as they have prevented the stolen 2020 election from being decertified. - ED}
Share this:
;
