by Allen Williams

Thank you for the reply.

I'd like to take the opportunity to clarify several issues raised in your recent email. The first is your statement that over "250 audits of the 2020 election were performed in accordance with state law."  Your definition of 'audit' can't mean anymore than resolving vote tallies between ballot images and actual ballots. This procedure has NOT worked very well in the Windham, New Hampshire audit to date

None of Michigan's alleged audits looked into the machine's works to verify whether or not the components contained therein were legal. So, to clarify, the only valid Michigan audit performed to date was in Amtrim county which required a lawsuit to initiate. It has been demonstrated in the 13th circuit court Antrim county lawsuit forensic audit that there was Dominion voting machine intervention in the election.  An examination inside the voting machine revealed an unauthorized program, Microsoft SQL,a feature that permits vote manipulation. In addition judge Eisenheimer allowed the audit to cover 13 addition precincts in Antrim county where some 1060+ votes were recorded over and above Antrim county's voting population, memory traces were found inside the machine showing previous contact with Taiwan and Germany demonstrating both internet connectivity and foreign election interference. This is not an isolated incident involving voting machine fraud as there are additional incidents in Windham county, New Hampshire where Dominion is shorting the vote tallies and a separate forensic analysis is still underway in Maricopa County, AZ where key files in the EMS vote tabulator were found deleted.

The second is from my letter to Judge Eisenheimer which stated Judge Murray previously ruled that Jocelyn Benson's decision to assume the signatures on absentee ballots were inherently valid (What?), this assumption violates Michigan law which makes her complicit in the 1060+ ghost mail in ballots identified in the forensic audit. Benson was added as a defendant in Attorney Matt Deperno/s second amended complaint.  Read it at http://depernolaw.com. 

100 Percent Fed Up reports – In March, Attorney Matt DePerno subpoenaed 8 clerks in key counties in Michigan: Barry, Charlevoix, Grand Traverse, Kent, Livingston, Macomb, Oakland, and Wayne. In his subpoenas, DePerno asked to have access to their poll tapes, ballots, logs, tally servers, election management servers, election media, spreadsheets, and canvasser notes from the 2020 election. The judge denied their requests after all 8 counties filed motions to quash his request. In Grand Traverse County, Haider Kazim and Michigan’s dishonest Democrat Secretary of State filed a joint motion to quash DePerno’s request.

The forensic evidence and the court's determination that Secretary Benson violated state law should have been more than enough to alert the Michigan legislature to at least investigate MaComb, Oakland, Wayne, and Kent counties for similar irregularities. And if found, immediate steps should have been taken to decertify the election, except that certain Republican members share culpability in advocating for and purchasing Dominion voting machines. 

Everyone makes mistakes, You would have retained much more credibility If you would have admitted mistakes and then acted to correct them, instead of doing nothing but obstructing people who were trying to get at the truth. It is your constitutional responsibility to discipline judges who prevent cases from proceeding pursuant to real evidence in order to reinforce the illusion that American elections are secure. It is your responsibility to address electoral fraud issues that have been revealed by the Antrim county forensic audit. 

THIS IS CORRUPTION at the highest levels of Michigan government.

And last: This is all part of the general movement to silence individuals who accuse state officials of corruption as has been revealed in Dr. Shiva's Massachusetts lawsuit Case 1:20-cv-11889-MLW Document 118 Filed 05/21/21 Page 1 of 7 at: https://vashiva.com/first-amendment-twitter-galvin-lawsuit/ where it was revealed that an official manual for silencing accusers exists entitled 'Elections Influence Operations Playbook for State and Local Officials.'

As I have stated before this issue is NOT going away.  You needn't bother creating further election legislation because without addressing the 2020 election fraud, new legislation will simply be ignored as Secretary Benson has aptly demonstrated.

Your inaction threatens the continuance of America's Representative Republic.

Hi Allen, Thank you for reaching out to the Office of Speaker Jason Wentworth regarding your concerns about the integrity of Michigan elections. As you know, safe elections are a cornerstone of our democracy and it is essential that all Michiganders trust every election. Our office has been listening to the voters of the 97th district and across Michigan that share your same concerns. Speaker Wentworth will continue working hard to ensure our elections are secure. Over 250 audits were performed in accordance with state law and the Michigan Constitution. The results of the election were formally confirmed by these audits, which included hand counts from selected precincts throughout the state. The House has also approved several reform measures this year to ensure our elections run fairly. These include plans to remove dead people from our voter rolls, require verification of a person’s birth date when their birth date is unknown before voting, and to provide more training for everyone involved in the elections process. In the latest challenge originating in Antrim County, a circuit court judge ruled that a post-election audit hand count showed results largely consistent with the canvass totals entered by the state, and the plantiffs’ request for another audit was satisfied by the hand recount. Michigan families deserve fair and safe elections – and Speaker Wentworth remains committed to supporting bold, common-sense reforms to do just that. Thank you again for contacting the Office of Speaker Jason Wentworth to share your perspective. If my staff or I can be of further assistance, please call 517-373-8962 or email JasonWentworth@house.mi.gov.  Sincerely, Office of Speaker Jason Wentworth, District 97 Learn about the work I'm doing for the 97th district! Learn More! Contact Me   164 Capitol Building P.O. Box 30014 Lansing, MI 48909-7514 Phone: (517) 373-8962

[80QKOQ-PGYO]

Judge Eisenheimer:

I was not really surprised by your decision to dismiss the Antrim County election lawsuit indicating an unwillingness to address the criminal fraud uncovered in the case.  But I was truly appalled at the lack of logic displayed in your reasoning. As Uncover Dc reports:

• One, the Plaintiffs claims are moot as all requested relief has been granted and, therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction to review moot claims;
• Two, Plaintiff lacks standing to bring its claims into court; and
• Three, Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

This is absolute nonsense. Plaintiffs claims in One are NOT moot, they have successfully demonstrated FRAUD. You have an obligation to follow the evidence trail where ever it leads, Why this concept has eluded you poses some interesting questions..

Plaintiff does not lack standing. The Michigan constitution was amended in 2018 to grant standing for any person to challenge the results of a state wide election.  The secretary of state's supposed audit is NOT a substitute for a further Antrim county audit nor does it satisfy the pleadings of Mr. Bailey since (1) Benson was included as a defendant in the amended complaint and (2) Judge Murray previously ruled that Jocelyn Benson's decision to assume the signatures on absentee ballots were inherently valid (What?) when this assumption violated Michigan law which makes her complicit in the 1060+ ghost mail in ballots identified in the forensic audit. This incredible statement by you infers that (1) you lack legal discernment OR (2) it was a direct attempt to block the audit from continuing.

Your final statement that plaintiff has failed to state a basis for which relief might be granted demonstrates a deliberate attempt to end the case rather than pursue the fraud wherever it might lead. The obvious next step would have been to investigate several other counties to see if they got similar results using the Dominion machines. Your willingness to allow other county clerks to quash subpoenas for the Dominion election evidence, when fraud had been clearly demonstrated in Antrim county, corroborates my suspicion that you have been compromised. Anyone with an ounce of gray matter has to suspect that you have either been blackmailed or threatened into rendering this decision 

The obvious takeaway here is that you had to have been surprised by Attn. Deperno's findings that a stolen school board election was only a small portion of a greater fraud to deny the American public their rightful selection of President. At this point, you must have experienced some panic as you became aware that this case would be the first to expose the wholesale fraud of the 'most secure election in American History'

Lastly, blocking further discovery, when new evidence has surfaced, confirms my suspicions and further suggests that the state legislature (if that had any collective backbone) should remove you from the bench. 

Just a reminder to you and your fellow obstructionists that this issue is NOT going away, we the people will get to the bottom of it.

Diebold Election Systems, for those who don’t know your election machine history, acquired Global Election Systems in 2002 and, strategically, changed its name in 2007 to Premier Election Solutions, which was eventually partially purchased, in 2010, by a company called Dominion Voting Systems. Dominion is, of course, the very same company whose machines are being forensically audited in Maricopa County, Arizona, and which were used, statewide, by Georgia in the 2020 election.According to Harris, “Following the Florida demonstration, New Hampshire chose to purchase the voting machine make and model that Hursti had proven to be tamperable.”

Hursti’s own testimony about NH’s Diebold AccuVote OS machines and memory cards, given at NH House Election Law Committee hearings on September 19, 2007, confirmed his professional opinion that these machines and memory cards are untrustworthy:

If you are believing on poll tape that doesn’t mean a thing because I can control the whole thing over whatever logic and accuracy that you perform just before the election. Because I have control. I can compare the date, the time. And so in order to be producing fraudulent tape, I will be producing fraudulent tape only on Tuesday evening. And I don’t worry about what ballots go through.

Therefore, back in 2007, the Diebold machines and memory cards that Hursti boasted about being able to secretly control, are the same ones Lindeman, Hursti, and Stark were all supposed to audit.

The cold, hard facts are that an audit of these machines and especially their memory cards is an entirely useless activity, and Hursti showed why 16 years ago. Yet why are Lindeman (who is not even a computer scientist, he has a Ph.D. in political science) and especially Hursti, the two now sans Stark, claiming they will need “90 minutes to read” each card?

Hursti agreeing to “audit” these Diebold memory cards, given his national exposure of their egregious built-in flaws, is indefensible, suspicious and you now have to wonder, just what is his real agenda?  Also, why, did Verified Voting appear to disappear evidence of Hursti’s seat upon its advisory board?

VV’s current webpage shows he is not a member. However, the Internet Archive tells a very different story. As of April 29, Hursti is shown as being a member. On May 3, the NH AG and SoS hired him to be a member of their audit team. Two days later, on May 5, any evidence of Hursti’s participation as an advisor with Verified Voting had been deleted.

Philip Stark, whom Hursti and Lindeman co-selected as the third auditor, either employed Philip Stark, contracted with him, or has had some sort of close professional relationship with him since mid-2018. Hursti co-founded Nordic Innovation Labs, which conducts Security Assessment & Vulnerability Consulting. On the business’s About Us page, Stark is one of three Nordic Network team members. Sometime after February 26, 2021, Stark’s name and bio were removed from that webpage.

The three of these auditors, rather than being a professional, independently-functioning group of auditors – an impression which everyone involved tried hard to create – are actually not that at all.

As far as these computer scientists go, it certainly does appear that yet another entity, another profession that works with, and has influence upon our American election infrastructure has been infiltrated and compromised.

This certainly aligns directly with the goals of top progressive Democrat leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, who appointed Dr. Philip Stark and Dr. Barbara Simons to positions of great power and influence upon the U.S. EAC, and who are now observing the fruits of their labor in New Hampshire.

Related:  BREAKING: One of Three Auditors Exits Windham, NH Election Audit – Law Requires a Team of Three Auditors

Read more

By Staff

A government private company relationship to marginalize and de platform individuals over first amendment speech is Fascism. These are the playbooks developed by Twitter to suppress opposing views to the state narrative:

All these referenced documents with links to their content are available here: https://vashiva.com/first-amendment-twitter-galvin-lawsuit/

From Dr Shiva's court filing at: Case 1:20-cv-11889-MLW Document 118 Filed 05/21/21 Page 1 of 7

Plaintiff has independently discovered the documentary evidence proving that Tassinari, Cohen, NASED and Twitter Legal jointly collaborated to design and build the core infrastructure, processes, and protocols enabling the Twitter Trusted Partnership Program and the Twitter Partner Support Portal (PSP).

In2017,Cohen and others began formulating and designing the framework for silently violating the free speech rights of US persons by first characterizing speakers as “Influence Operators” (IOs) thereby fabricating a sinister connotation where none exists, as the ideological frame work to justify canceling speakers who exercise their right to express their opinion.

All of these finally culminated in 2020 in the final manual for state officials called the Elections Influence Operations Playbook for State and Local Officials, for which Cohen and Twitter Legal are architects.This manual is split into three parts. The first two parts are available to the public.The third part is available only to state and local officials. Part1 provides the theoretical foundation for identifying and targeting “Influence Operators,”i.e. persons who accuse state election officials of corruption or make allegations that state elections may have violated Federal law.

When ever government enlists and dictates user behaviors that are NOT desired or dictates policies to view point discriminate is known as fascism.

In 2018, Amy Cohen, as Executive Director for NASED, testified to Congress about this emerging framework that she helped to formulate and architect in 2017, in cooperation with state officials and that they created a new centralized Governing Coordinating Council (GCC) that brought together both state and federal officials to create an electronic infrastructure for surveying speech and monitoring“ Influence Operators.”

So there we have an admission by the director of NASED that the avowed purpose of this 'energing framework' is to control free speech by de-platforming those defined as 'influence' operators.

"Bruce Lund, a senior member of In-Q-Tel’s technical staff, noted in a 2012 paper that “monitoring social media” is increasingly essential for government agencies seeking to keep track of “erupting political movements, crises, epidemics, and disasters, not to mention general global trends.” This statement necessarily infers that "erupting political movements" includes speech that opposes  government narratives.

The article continues:  “When you have private companies deciding which algorithms get you a so-called threat score, or make you a person of interest, there’s obviously room for targeting people based on viewpoints or even unlawfully targeting people based on race or religion,” said Lee Rowland, a senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union.

This is exactly what is happening with Twitter's de platforming of views that conflict with government political agenda narratives.