The Patriots

by Assistant Editor

The Arizona Attorney General has finally released an interim report on his investigation into the Maricopa County November 3rd, 2020 General Election.

The entire investigation has been delayed by Maricopa County’s ‘document preservation & production issues.’ The Attorney General reported to Arizona Senate President Karen Fann that his office is still receiving new information and that Maricopa County has still not fully complied with document requests.

What have they been hiding? 

The letter to Karen Fann said, “The EIU’s review has uncovered instances of election fraud by individuals who have been or will be prosecuted for various elections crimes.”

Mark Brnovich tweeted, “We can report that there are problematic system-wide issues that relate to early ballot handling and verification.”

I just dropped off our initial review of the 2020 election audit to President Fann.

We can report that there are problematic system-wide issues that relate to early ballot handling and verification. https://t.co/Pgogo9A7uO

— Mark Brnovich (@GeneralBrnovich) April 6, 2022

The report reveals that “between 100,000 and 200,000 ballots were transported without a proper chain of custody,” and signature verification standards were greatly decreased in the 2020 election. The Attorney General concluded that “Maricopa County failed to follow the EPM procedures when transporting 20% of the early ballots from drop box locations to MCTEC.”

The Attorney General alleges that 381 out of 1,895 Early Voting Ballot Transport Statements were missing required information such as ballot counts, audit signatures, courrier signatures, election department receiver signals, and documentation of security seals.

This is inconsistent with the Verity Vote investigation findings, which used public records requests for all ballot box retrieval and chain of custody forms utilized in Maricopa County during the 2020 General Election. This investigation found that Maricopa County failed to record the number of ballots on 1,514 out of 1,895 unique EVBTS and failed to record signatures on 48 of these documents.

Regarding signature verification standards, the report states, “the early ballot affidavit signature verification system in Arizona, and particularly when applied to Maricopa County, may be insufficient to guard against abuse.”

Under County Recorder Adrian Fontes, Maricopa County saw a massive decrease in the number of ballots rejected due to missing signatures or mismatched signatures. Due to the large volume of mail-in ballots in the 2020 election, the limited training of elections workers, and time restrictions, the AG’s office determined that 206,648 early ballot signatures were verified on November 4, 2020, with an average time of 4.6 seconds per signature.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Dr. Shiva’s extensive study of Maricopa County’s signature verification standards found an additional 200,000 signature discrepancies. There was no mention of this groundbreaking report.

This report also failed to mention any crimes committed by ballot traffickers and discovered by True The Vote and Dinesh DSouza. DSouza’s upcoming film is set to expose the nationwide operation that was used to steal the 2020 election from President Trump.

Rassmussen Reports noted the AG’s silence on this key election fraud scam.

2020 Election Integrity: Arizona – Brnovich Has Bupkis Counterfeit ballots, ballot trafficking ballrooms & trafficking mules, nope. 6 months of total silence & then technical excuses on records production don't get you into the U.S. Senate.

Thank you for playing, Mark! https://t.co/0Abo7ekVO0 pic.twitter.com/kQQqH2olO6

Read more

by Judicial Watch

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that a federal court ruled its lawsuit can proceed against Colorado officials to force a cleanup of the state’s voter rolls.

Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit October 5, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado on behalf of itself and three residents of Colorado against Jena Griswold, Colorado Secretary of State, and the State of Colorado for failing to clean the state’s voter rolls as required by the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA).

The court’s recent ruling to allow Judicial Watch’s claims to proceed came after Colorado’s motion to dismiss the case, which the court denied in all key respects.

The court ruled that the individual plaintiffs have standing to sue based on the fact that “noncompliance with the NVRA undermines the individual plaintiffs’ confidence in the integrity of the electoral process and discourages their participation [in elections].”

[Judicial Watch’s] claims that the Secretary is not complying with the NVRA are based on public records and statistical analysis. Plaintiffs insist that they have shown not only high registration rates, which they claim courts have found indicative of an NVRA violation, but also that the Secretary sends too few Confirmation Notices, removes too few registrants, and has too high a number of inactive voters on the rolls. . . . [T]he Court finds that plaintiffs have met their burden and have plausibly alleged that Colorado’s list maintenance program does not comply with the NVRA.

• A 2019 study showed that 40 of Colorado’s 64 counties had voter registration rates exceeding 100% of the eligible citizen voting-age population. The share of Colorado counties with registration rates exceeding 100% was the highest in the nation.
• Data Colorado itself provided to the federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC) showed that Colorado was lagging in the processing and removal of certain classes of ineligible registrations belonging to those who had moved out of state.
• In the last two years, 60 of Colorado’s 64 counties had a higher percentage of inactive registrations than the national median.
• In eight Colorado counties, more than one in six registrations belonged to an inactive voter.

Judicial Watch notes that registration rates over 100%, poor processing of out-of-date registrations, and high levels of inactive registrations “indicate an ongoing, systemic problem with Colorado’s voter list maintenance efforts.” Colorado’s “failure to comply with their … voter list maintenance obligations” injures lawfully registered voters by “undermining their confidence in the integrity of the electoral process, discouraging their participation in the democratic process, and instilling in them the fear that their legitimate votes will be nullified or diluted.”

Judicial Watch has asked the court to declare that Colorado and its Secretary of State are violating the NVRA and to order them to “develop and implement a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove the registrations of ineligible registrants from the voter rolls in Colorado …”

“Dirty voting rolls can mean dirty elections. And this court victory highlights how Colorado citizens and voters have a right to expect that the state’s voting rolls are reasonably kept up to date, as federal law requires,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

Judicial Watch is a national leader for cleaner elections.

In 2020, Judicial Watch also sued North Carolina and Pennsylvania for failing to clean their voter rolls.

In 2018, the Supreme Court upheld a voter-roll cleanup program that resulted from a Judicial Watch settlement of a federal lawsuit with Ohio. California settled a federal lawsuit with Judicial Watch and in 2019 began the process of removing up to 1.6 million inactive names from Los Angeles County’s voter rolls.

Read more

by Joe Hoft

It’s official.  The GOP voters in Wisconsin for more than half of the state are calling for the decertification of the 2020 Election results in the state.  This news was passed around on social media this weekend.

(Natural News) The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is refusing to comply with requests for data surrounding adverse side effects caused by Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) "vaccines," so Judicial Watch is suing. According to reports, the legal watchdog group has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) suit against the … [Read More...]