Welcome to the New World Order!!
Welcome to the New World Order!!
Welcome to the New World Order!!
by Allen Williams
The Telegraph has an explosive story that places the Covid-19 Wuhan virus squarely in the hands of the Communist Chinese.
"COVID-19 is an "unrestricted bio-weapon" that slipped from a Wuhan facility. This claim was according to a Chinese virologist who fled to the United States after claiming that China covered up the coronavirus epidemic.
Dr. Li Meng-Yan, a whistleblower, claims that a trove of Dr. Anthony Fauci's emails backs up her assertions. In an interview with Newsmax, the Chinese whistleblower said she had emailed Dr. Anthony Fauci about her theory and "discovery."
Dr. Li published research on her claims and discoveries on COVID-19's origins in the Wuhan bio lab last year. A Chinese virologist was one of the researchers who looked at it. Science Times reported that her studies were shut down and removed. It forced her to flee for her safety. Dr. Yan has been barred from social media since then for "misinformation." - https://www.sciencetimes.com/articles/31562/20210606/is-covid-19-a-bioweapon-heres-what-chinese-whistleblower-dr-li-meng-yan-told-dr-anthony-fauci-in-email.htm
"There should now be no doubt that China has had an active
and extensive biological warfare program of which COVID-19 was one of
its “biotechnological weapons” https://richardsonpost.com/joe-hoft/23920/new-report-shows-covid-was-a-chinese-bioweapon/
Expect that a unique program of only 'the vaccinated may vote' to
soon emerge in the United States, perhaps as early as 2022, as the puppet BIden
Administration will need to 'guarantee' the next
election from the exposed 2020 machine and other fraud. Of course, this would never be considered as voter disenfranchisement'.
What more effective means under a never ending virus threat could ensure a globalist
victory?
by Revolver
HUDSON, Quebec (The Pipeline) — In a 2020 Ted Talk,
Bill Gates famously argued that world population is approaching an
unsustainable level of 9 billion, a looming catastrophe that needed to
be addressed by finding ways to significantly reduce population growth.
The route to this end, apparently, is to make people healthier. The
solution he proposed included a three-part plan, which he described as
“doing a really great job on Vaccines, Health Care and Reproductive
Health Services,” which could “lower [world population] by perhaps 10 to
15 percent.” Many have accused Gates of proposing genocide.
In my
estimation, that is plainly a bridge too far, but it usefully highlights
the dark underbelly of much of his acclaimed philanthropy and his
undoubted globalist initiatives.
Gates’ terms are troubling. Vaccines are the core issue, triggering a profound controversy that has polarized entire nations, yet he staunchly supports and has invested heavily in these experimental therapies. “Health care” is an abstract term that can mean anything one chooses it to mean; indeed, it has been used as a rationale for eugenics in its most criminal forms. And “reproductive health” is quite obviously code for abortion. It is clear why many people consider Gates a dangerous man. He is indescribably wealthy, influential and powerful, and also persuasively glib in furthering his various agendas. Obviously, no one can determine absolutely what his underlying motives might be. Is he philanthropist or exploiter, hero or villain, savior or eugenicist? But there is ample warrant to remain skeptical of his bona fides.
To be sure, his Ted Talk was framed in the context of global warming and the obligation to reduce CO2 emissions, a challenge that could be met by reducing the planetary census. According to his formula, CO2 = P x S x E x C, where P = People, S = Services per person, E = Energy per service, and C = CO2 per energy unit, fewer people in a congested world means less atmospheric carbon and the consequent decline in the rate of (ostensibly) rising global temperature.
Another discrepancy in Gates’ argument involves his claim that population can be reduced by making people healthier. In defending Gates, Maarten Schenk at Lead Stories points to arguments that wealthier and healthier people produce fewer children since they don’t have to adjust for massive child mortality. “So, what about the remarks about ‘new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services’?” Schenk asks rhetorically, and answers:
That is just what specialists studying population growth are saying. As people get richer, they get more access to better healthcare so they stop having lots of babies because the risk of their children dying at an early age takes a steep dive. This means the total population stabilizes and stops growing after a while.On the surface, this looks like a strong argument, especially with respect to underdeveloped countries. The problem is that advantaged people may enjoy having more children—perhaps not in the decadent West at this time in history, but possibly in the future, and certainly as we see now in countries like Hungary and Poland, which are returning to their ancestral traditions, restoring the sanctity of marriage, re-establishing the vitality of the Christian faith and financially incentivizing procreation. The result is rapidly growing families. In such countries, healthy people produce more, not fewer, children. The formula could be: H=V=C. Health equals Vitality equals Children. Gates’ X may conceivably turn out to be non-X.
Apart from the question of his un-thought-through contradictions, Gates
is deeply implicated in problematic enterprises. His preposterous plan to
spray tons of dust into space to dim the sun’s rays would be a prelude
to disaster, a telling instance of the ignorance and naiveté of the
supposedly super-brilliant. And as is well known, Gates is an active proponent of Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset,
which promises to transform the free-market democratic West into an
oligarchic model of centralized social control, a sequel characterized
by increased market and technological integration, corporate control of
natural resources, the elimination of private property, the colossal
transfer of wealth to the patrician class, and expanded state
surveillance—Build Back Worse. Schwab in turn credits Gates for his input and vision. Reset or space dust, the upshot is not a welcoming blueprint for the future.