Secret Documents: How Pfizer Covered Up a Flood of Adverse Events

by Stevan Looney


I am a civil trial and appellate attorney in New Mexico, with experience litigating complex matters. My prior essay for DailyClout.io regarding the Pfizer WarRoom Document Review — for which I volunteer as one of 250 attorneys — argued that the documents clearly show evidence of fraud on the part of Pfizer. The latest tranche of documents, released on April 1, 2022, show an equally dramatic revelation: Pfizer knew by February of 2021, that there were had been ‘a large number of adverse events’ in the three months prior

Pfizer also realized that these adverse events were so abundant — and they expected so many more in the months to come — that they advised the FDA that they would hire 2400 additional staffers to deal with the paperwork and data processing they expected due to the anticipated volume of adverse events!  

I reviewed the April 1, 2022, tranche of Pfizer documents the FDA produced pursuant to a federal court order. A document produced on November 17, 2021, was also produced as “reissued” on April 1, 2022. At first glance they appear identical, but they are not. Importantly, information redacted (deleted) from the document produced in the March 2022 production, was included in the April 1, 2022, production. This information is quite telling and some conclusions can be drawn.

The document produced on November 17, 2021, is titled “5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf” (November 17, 2021 (984 KB)). That same document in the April 1, 2022, production is titled “reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf”. (April 1, 2022 (958 KB)). The word “reissue” is absent in the November 2021 version. That made me curious, so I did a comparison of the two documents. Here is what one will find on page 6. (The “Bates” number in both documents in the bottom, right-hand corner is “FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0000059.”)

The lengthy paragraph on page 6 of the November 2021 document concerns adverse events reports received by Pfizer as of February 28, 2021. The third sentence of that paragraph in both documents reads: “Due to the large number of spontaneous adverse events reports received for the product [i.e., BNT162b2], the MAH [Marketing Authorization Holder] has prioritized the processing of serious cases, in order to meet expedited regulatory reporting timelines and ensure these reports are available for signal detection and evaluation activity.”

This paragraph ends: “Pfizer has also taken a [sic] multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports.” Think about that sentence.

“This includes significant technology enhancements, and process and workflow solutions, as well as increasing the number of data entry and case processing colleagues. To date, Pfizer has onboarded approximately 600 additional full-time employees (FTEs). More are joining each month with an expected total of more than 1,800 additional resources by the end of June 2021 [emphasis added].”

Also on page 6, under the heading “3. RESULTS”, at “3.1.1 General Overview”, Pfizer discloses in the document produced on April 1, 2022, what it redacted from the same document produced in November of 2021. What Pfizer had produced in April 2022 to take the place of the redacted document in November 2021 document was the fact that for the three-month period beginning December 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021, Pfizer shipped “approximately 126,212,580 [emphasis added] doses of [the FDA emergency use authorized] BNT162b2″ worldwide.

The 126,212,580 figure is redacted in the document produced in November 2021 but is included in the “reissue” document of April 1, 2022.

Likewise, the new, full-time 600 and 1,800 employees, amounting to a total of 2,400 full-time employees, hired to deal with all the anticipated adverse events, are included in the document produced on April 1, 2022, but had been redacted from the same document the FDA had produced in November of 2021. Why the foregoing data were redacted, but then disclosed, we do not know, yet. We do know that the redacted information is damning. What did we learn by comparing the two documents?

First, between December 1, 2020 and February 28, 2021, a period of three months, “a large number of spontaneous adverse events reports” were made to Pfizer regarding the administration to humans of the BNT162b2 “vaccine” for which the FDA had provided emergency use authorization (EUA).

Second, by February 28, 2021, (the date of the document) Pfizer knew that by June of 2021 it would hire at least an additional 2,400 full-time employees to process the adverse events reports Pfizer was receiving. (Appendix 1 to these documents is a list of 1,290 adverse events of special interest (AESI) received in connection with the BNT162b2 “product.” Based upon my research to date, I have found no evidence that these AESI were disclosed publicly prior to November of 2021.)

Lastly, and incredibly, despite having this information, on August 23, 2021, the FDA granted continued EUA status for the BNT162b2 “vaccine” and also approved Bio-N-Tech/Pfizer’s product known as COMIRNATY. Notably, according to the FDA, both the EUA BNT162b2 and the “approved” COMIRNATY are identical and interchangeable products. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that COMIRNATY also causes “a large number of spontaneous adverse events,” including the adverse events and AESI listed in Appendix 1 to these documents.

In sum, Pfizer did not only apparently commit fraud, but they also compounded the fraud by hiring 2,400 full-time employees to deal with the flood of adverse events that they expected – and yet they told no one about this publicly.

 I will continue to issue analyses of these historic documents.

Mr. Looney is a civil trial and appellate attorney with 42 years of experience, concentrating on complex matters.  Mr. Looney is licensed in New Mexico and practices in all its courts, as well as the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, the US Tax Court and the US Supreme Court.  Mr. Looney served in the U.S. Army as an infantryman from 1970-1972, assigned to the 82nd Arbrn. Div.

Article Source: https://dailyclout.io/how-pfizer-covered-up-anticipated-adverse-events/ 







War Room: Dr. Naomi Wolf Reports Vaccine Dangers for Unborn Babies Are Becoming Clearer

by Linnea Wahl, Team 5 (War Room group led by Dr. Naomi Wolf)

In this video, volunteer Linnea Wahl from Team 5 discusses dangers faced by vaccinated, pregnant women and their babies. Are pregnant women who get the Pfizer mRNA vaccine putting their unborn babies at increased of dying? DailyClout’s Team 5 looks at the Pfizer data and answers this question.




Whistleblower: Pfizer FORGED signatures of trial participants, falsified and fabricated trial data

(Natural News) A former Pfizer contractor-turned-whistleblower said the Big Pharma company forged informed consent signatures and falsified and fabricated clinical trial data for its Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) mRNA vaccine. Brook Jackson, who has nearly 20 years of experience in clinical research for the pharmaceutical and medical … [Read More...]


Bombshell study: Pfizer’s covid jab contents enter the liver, alter human chromosomes and rewrite DNA

by: Ethan Huff

Related:  Bombshell Study — Pfizer Vaccine Goes Into Liver Cells and Is Converted to DNA…

               ‘Permanent chromosomal change’…

               CDC caught lying, refuses to comment…

Image Bombshell study Pfizers covid jab contents enter the liver alter human chromosomes and rewrite DNA

(Natural News) Swedish researchers from Lund University have found that the contents of Pfizer’s Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” enter human liver cells and convert into DNA.

When the jab’s messenger RNA (mRNA) spike proteins are injected into the body, they travel to the liver and trigger DNA located inside the nuclei of liver cells. This increases the expression of the LINE-1 gene that makes mRNA.

After this is complete, the mRNA leaves the nuclei and enters the cytoplasm of cells, translating into LINE-1 protein. A segment of this protein called the open reading frame-1 or ORF-1 then goes back into the nuclei of liver cells where it attaches to the jab’s mRNA and reverse transcribes it into spike DNA.

Reverse transcription is when DNA is made from RNA, by the way. The normal transcription process, on the other hand, involves a portion of the DNA serving as a template to make an mRNA molecule inside the nuclei.

“In this study we present evidence that COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 is able to enter the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro,” the researchers wrote in a paper that was published in the journal Current Issues of Molecular Biology.

“BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA as fast as 6 [hours] after BNT162b2 exposure,” they added, BNT162b2 being another name for the Pfizer-BioNTech injection the two companies are calling a “vaccine” – another name for the jab is Comirnaty.

CDC lied about mRNA shots, claimed they would never enter cell nuclei

The entire process described above occurs in just six hours. The Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA injection converts into artificial DNA during this time, which contradicts what the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has long said about how the jabs supposedly work.

“The genetic material delivered by mRNA vaccines never enters the nucleus of your cells,” still reads the CDC’s web page entitled, “Myths and Facts about COVID-19 Vaccines.”

This is the first time, by the way, that researchers have shown either in vitro or in a petri dish how mRNA injections convert into DNA on a human liver cell line. Again, the “experts” and “fact checkers” continue to falsely claim that this is not possible.

“COVID-19 vaccines do not change or interact with your DNA in any way,” the CDC still claims about both the mRNA injections and the viral vector alternatives from Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and AstraZeneca.

Ever since the shots were launched by Donald Trump under Operation Warp Speed, the “authorities” have insisted that the contents of the shots are quickly discarded by the body once antibodies are produced, which is a lie.

“These vaccines deliver genetic material that instructs cells to begin making spike proteins found on the surface of SARS-CoV-2 that causes COVID-19 to produce an immune response,” reports The Epoch Times.

A Pfizer spokesperson responded to the new study’s revelations by claiming falsely that its mRNA injection “does not alter the DNA sequence of a human cell.”

“These vaccines deliver genetic material that instructs cells to begin making spike proteins found on the surface of SARS-CoV-2 that causes COVID-19 to produce an immune response,” reports The Epoch Times.

A Pfizer spokesperson responded to the new study’s revelations by claiming falsely that its mRNA injection “does not alter the DNA sequence of a human cell.”

“It only presents the body with the instructions to build immunity,” this person still claims.

Another thing the Swedish study revealed is that mRNA spike proteins on the surface of liver cells could cause autoimmune hepatitis.

“[T]here [have] been case reports on individuals who developed autoimmune hepatitis after BNT162b2 vaccination,” the study authors wrote.

They also presented the first reported case of a healthy 35-year-old female who developed autoimmune hepatitis one week after her first “dose” of Pfizer’s mRNA injection.

There is a possibility, the authors further wrote, that “spike-directed antibodies induced by vaccination may also trigger autoimmune conditions in predisposed individuals.”

The latest news about Pfizer’s mRNA injection can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.

Sources for this article include:

TheEpochTimes.com

NaturalNews.com

FacebookTwitter