Something Stinks in Colorado !

by News Editors

Image Something stinks in Colorado

(Natural News) According to the State of Colorado — and The Associated Press and the New York Times! — the official results for the GOP primary race for Secretary of State have Pam Anderson winning with 43% of the total vote, and Tina Peters second with 28% — but the real story was that Australian businessman Mike O’Donnell had picked up 28% himself, and might actually beat Tina Peters too.

(Article by Emerald Robinson republished from EmeraldDB3.Substack.com)


I wanted to know more about Mike O’Donnell because I had never heard of Mike O’Donnell.

In the most high-profile race in America for the office of Secretary of State, a candidate who had become a national political figure, who had the highest name recognition, who outraised both of her opponents by 3 to 1, who spoke at rallies with President Trump, who was the obvious frontrunner — that person didn’t just lose, but she tied with a guy who had none of those things in a GOP primary.

I didn’t even know that Mike O’Donnell was running in the race until I saw the race results. How did an unknown candidate like Mike O’Donnell manage to garner as many votes as a national political figure like Tina Peters?

This question, ladies and gentlemen, is what leads you down the rabbit hole of America’s bogus election system.

I went looking, in other words, for Mike O’Donnell’s 170,000 supporters in Colorado.


I didn’t find them on Facebook — only 193 people were following his campaign page.

Mike O’Donnell’s 170,000 supporters were not hiding on Twitter either — just 560 of them were following his campaign at all. The day before the election, his last tweet managed to get 4 “likes.”

That’s the most interaction that his campaign Twitter account got — ever.

Mike O’Donnell sent out 1,306 tweets on his account and the vast majority of them got: 0 Likes — and 0 Retweets — and 0 Comments. There was no interaction on his Twitter account because nobody was voting for Mike O’Donnell.

How about fundraising? According to Colorado Public Radio News, Mike O’Donnell had managed to raise $4,700 for his campaign three weeks before the primary.

And yet on election day, Mike O’Donnell got nearly a third of the total vote and over 600,000 people voted in that race. More than 170,000 Colorado voters suddenly appear out of nowhere for Mike O’Donnell.

So many people suddenly appear for Mike O’Donnell that he actually wins 17 counties in Colorado.

Mike O’Donnell is the outright winner in Jackson County (43%) and Rio Blanco County (37%) and Conejos County (41%) and Fremont County (34%) and Las Animas County (36%) and Prowers County (37%) and Bent County (34%) and Otero County (40%) and Kiowa County (38%) and Lincoln County (39%) and Cheyenne County (40%) and Kit Carson County (42%) and Yuma County (43%) and Washington County (40%) and Morgan County (38%) and Phillips County (34%) and Sedgwick County (38%) according to the New York Times .

Here’s a screenshot of those wins county by county for Mike O’Donnell (in yellow) from the New York Times today.



Does this scenario seem remotely possible to you?

Something stinks in Colorado.






UPS GOES FULL WOKE

                                                             UPS GOES FULL WOKE

                                                 UPS announces it will assist government in

                                          unconstitutional confiscation, destroying of gun parts

 

           https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/new-yorks-ag-nyc-mayor-file-suit-against-ghost-gun-makers-as-stunt/

 

The Globalist News Cartel – Understanding M.O.R.O.N.

by PatriotsStaff

It's become common practice today for the media to claim something contrary to what everyone else witnesses. For example, the media calls the protests against pregnancy centers “Leftists Firebomb Pregnancy Centers and Burn Churches to the Ground, Media Calls Them “ Mostly Peaceful”. Then there’s Liz Cheney, chair of the infamous J6 ‘sideshow’ and her latest witness who claims Trump grabbed the steering wheel of the Presidential Limo and when the agent blocked his hand he assaulted him was proven false in less than two hours. J6 is a freak show to allow the media a platform to report accusations that would prevent Trump from ever running again. The media mission is not to report the news but to create the necessary narratives that condition the public mind to accept a globalist agenda. You are probably thinking, what’s there to understand about M.O.R O. N?

 M.O.R.O.N. stands for Media Originated Reports Outside Normalcy, reduced to its acronym. It’s origin resides in the CIA and a ‘conspiracy theorist’ mind control program used to marginalize opposing truth narratives as we have witnessed in the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court hearings when Christine Blacey Ford accused him of attempted rape. But here’s the more likely scenario: “Natural News) (h/t to The Gateway Pundit for the initial lead). In another stunning bombshell about the hoax accusations against Brett Kavanaugh, we’ve now learned and confirmed that Christine Blasey Ford co-authored a science paper that involves her carrying out mass “hypnotic inductions” of psychiatric subjects as part of a mind control program that cites methods to “create artificial situations.”  

The above quote appears on Metabunk.org and the reader should keep in mind that this site exists to validate Blasey Ford because there are no challenging questions from any of its readers; all are busy attacking Mike Adam’s statements.  Amazing that no one questions Ford’s veracity.  But women are perfect for this kind of political operation because they are viewed as low threat, very emotional in testimony, so it must be true and immediately garner credibility.  But remember Anita Hill tried a similar sexual strategy against Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas when he was nominated to the high court that didn’t work. The hope is that repeating the same lie often enough causes people to believe it.. doesn’t always work especially when there is something more plausible available.

Be suspicious of websites that constantly claim’ objections are’ bunk’ or ’conspiracy theory’.  The sudden appearance of serious charges involving potential criminal activity when someone is up for confirmation is more than coincidence. It’s planned validation of the accusation. Public universities pioneered this concept by setting up their student justice programs based on emotion and mere accusation without DUE Process, i.e. the right to confront one’s accusers. Indoctrination has been public education’s goal for decades.

We are already under siege today in America by various federal agencies because of an illegitimate president and his ‘weaponization’ of these agencies that began in Obama’s term resulting in a present day two tier justice system.

Remember the news media has a long standing relationship with the CIA beginning in the era of Allen Dulles and reflected by the CIAs media assets.  Fake news and disinformation perform a valuable ‘damage’ control operation for agency objectives: “The Washington Post has already joined the disinformation campaign with their latest narrative that Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say.. ”Russia’s increasingly sophisticated propaganda machinery — including thousands of botnets, teams of paid human “trolls,” and networks of websites and social-media accounts — echoed and amplified right-wing sites across the Internet as they portrayed Clinton as a criminal hiding potentially fatal health problems and preparing to hand control of the nation to a shadowy cabal of global financiers.

Nonsense. Remember, in 'MORON' you must obfuscate normal understanding by redefining word definitions as necessary, in order to prevent the reader from thinking or reasoning anything logical out of what was written. It's why the definition of 'freedom' has been redefined as 'freedom from want, responsibility and God, not individual liberty.'

The Washington Post laid the groundwork for the public perception that Russia interfered in our elections to give Trump the win and detract from the fact that it was stolen domestically by people who have global aspirations. Thus a basis was established for ignoring evidence of election fraud because the ‘thought’ has been created that Trump wasn’t legitimate in his 2016 win. BUT.. UNcoverDC reports:Approximately 406,972 of the over 2.1 million ballots cast in Maricopa County were “of a predetermined origin” because of the use of algorithms. 38 percent of the mail-in ballots for Biden were found to be of a predetermined nature. 33 percent of the Trump ballots on Election Day were predetermined. After removing the fraudulently cast ballots, Trump got 59% of the votes. To find that “true vote,” Pulitzer removed the ballots contributing to the predetermined outcome. Biden only got 41 percent with the removal of the predetermined ballots.”

So now you can appreciate the beauty and relative ease with which a machine algorithm can manage an election.  How many votes would you like to win by? And it provides some insight as to why the courts would order a seal on a Dominion voting machine deficiency report. The report by J. Alex Halderman was filed under seal in July in federal court in Atlanta as part of a long-running lawsuit challenging Georgia’s voting machines. Halderman spent 12 weeks examining the Dominion Voting Systems machines used in Georgia and more than a dozen other states and identified “multiple severe security flaws” that would allow attackers to install malicious software, he wrote in a sworn declaration filed in the case.”

O.K., now find a tin hat to wear so you can get on the same frequency as the News Media. Ready?

The Media claim that the 2020 election fraud is baseless is mind control misinformation as reality is continuously recreated: “While Trump has most notably spent the last 18 months denying his 2020 election defeat, despite clear evidence he lost, he’s not the only one. During this election cycle, candidates across the country have refused to concede – even in races that are not remotely close… While Trump has most notably spent the last 18 months denying his 2020 election defeat, despite clear evidence he lost, he’s not the only one. During this election cycle, candidates across the country have refused to concede – even in races that are not remotely close.”

Maybe Trump’s failure to concede is driven by analytical investigations demonstrating real fraud as presented in depth on Frankspeech.com. The media claim that deficiencies found by Halderman have not been taken advantage of is classic MORON.  The definition of fraud has been changed to “as determined in a court of law so it doesn’t exist unless a court finds it. Colorado’s recent election data still doesn’t support the media’s assertions: “NPR reports:” This week, a Colorado county clerk indicted on charges including election tampering finished last in the GOP Secretary of State race, refused to acknowledge her loss and accused officials of cheating…“We didn’t lose. We just found more fraud,” Mesa County clerk Tina Peters told supporters at an Election Night party.”

The clear evidence claimed by the media doesn’t involve machine fraud where phantom voters and machine algorithms massage and switch numbers to alter an election. This isn’t our first rodeo involving Dominion; View the extensive Dominion fraud obtained from Plaintiff Matt Deperno in his Antrim County election lawsuit.  Never mind Dominion won’t allow anyone to look inside their’ black box, Tina Peters has already done it for this voting machine and why Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold was determined not to let her be elected. Look at the 2000 mule documentary tracking election mules stuffing drop ballot boxes through out the swing states at https://www.bitchute.com/video/oUxVva4yWsuu/ and decide for yourself.

Apparently some states understand the message about the dangers of electronic voting machines and are dumping them for paper ballots: New Missouri law bans use of electronic voting machines  What’s that old saying. ‘If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, IT”S a DUCK ! ‘

The courts have already confirmed that the 'compelling interest' of the state trumps constitutional rights and selecting candidates is better than allowing the people to elect their representatives.


Supreme Court Delivers Massive Blow To Biden’s Climate Agenda

by Josh Hypes


The US Supreme Court Issues Opinions


  • The Supreme Court dealt a critical blow to the Biden administration’s wide-ranging climate goals Thursday, limiting the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. 
  • “Congress did not grant EPA in Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act the authority to devise emissions caps based on the generation shifting approach the Agency took in the Clean Power Plan,” Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion.
  • The case was centered around a 2015 Obama-era EPA climate rule known as the Clean Air Act, which sought to cut carbon emissions from power plants by 32% by 2030.
The Supreme Court delivered a massive blow to the Biden administration’s climate change plan Thursday, severely limiting the power of federal agencies.

The Court, in a 6-3 decision on West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), limited the agency’s authority to regulate greenhouse gases from power plants, significantly curtailing the power of the federal agency. The decision restricts the agency to regulating individual power plants and not the entire power sector. (RELATED: Jen Psaki Says US Needs To Move Away From Crude Oil Altogether Amid Ukraine Crisis)

“Congress did not grant EPA in Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act the authority to devise emissions caps based on the generation shifting approach the Agency took in the Clean Power Plan,” Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion.

The case stems from an Obama-era EPA climate rule and addresses the scope of Congress’s ability to delegate legislative authority to executive agencies.

In August 2015, the EPA adopted the Clean Power Plan that sought to cut carbon emissions by 32% from power plants by 2030.

However, in early 2016, the Supreme Court blocked the plan’s implementation in a 5-4 vote. Plaintiffs successfully argued that the EPA had exceeded its congressional mandate under the 1970 Clean Air Act, which broadly authorizes the agency to issue the “best system of emission reduction.”

The Trump administration repealed the Clean Power Plan and created the Affordable Clean Energy Rule, which included looser restrictions and allowed states to regulate their standards.

“Unlike the Clean Power Plan, ACE adheres to the Clean Air Act and gives states the regulatory certainty they need to continue to reduce emissions and provide a dependable, diverse supply of electricity that all Americans can afford,” former EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler said in a statement at the time.

Hillsdale College Associate Professor of Politics Joseph Postell said the case has to do with the EPA’s authority to regulate major sources of air pollution that are stationary, like smokestacks.

“Does the statute allow the Obama administration to force the state of West Virginia to put more clean power into its energy grid as a means of reducing carbon emissions or does the Clean Air Act force the states to implement technology controls at the actual existing plants?” Postell said.

Postell said the new Trump rules regulated only the existing sources of air pollution rather than requiring new energy generation from sources like wind and solar.

“The Trump administration basically advanced version of what is now known as the major questions doctrine,” Postell said. “When there is a question of major importance or a major question. It has to be resolved by Congress and cannot be kicked over to the agency.”

In 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia vacated everything the day before Biden’s inauguration, according to SCOTUSblog. While the Biden Administration could reinstate the Clean Power Plan, it has instead chosen to draft alternate power plant emissions rules.

The Biden administration was awaiting the Supreme Court’s ruling before releasing its plan, The Washington Post reported.

Following the repeal, West Virginia led a coalition of 20 other Republican states and coal companies to file an appeal asking the Supreme Court to challenge the appeals court decision.

The plaintiffs argued that the appeals court wrongly grants “an agency unbridled power—functionally ‘no limits’—to decide whether and how to decarbonize almost any sector of the economy.” They asked the Supreme Court to preemptively intervene before the EPA issues additional emissions reduction plans or rules using this authority.