Economy Commentary 18 Absurdities of the McConnell-Schumer Omnibus Spending Bill..

by Allen Williams

This uni-party bill will bury future generations of Americans with debt that will be passed on to their descendants .Economy Commentary 18 Absurdities of the McConnell-Schumer Omnibus Spending Bill


Commentary By Richard Stern @RichAStern

Here are some examples

In under two weeks, the new GOP majority in the House finally will have the chance to use the power of the purse to rein in the reckless administration of President Joe Biden.  Instead, Republicans seem poised to give up this oversight power without firing even a single shot. This omnibus bill would provide a full year’s worth of funding to the administration—locking in its regulatory regime and capacity to abusively wield the power of the executive branch.

This will prevent the states from any type of self-government: Considering the PAYGO provision, “emergency” funding, increases in baseline budget authority, and expected increases in debt-servicing cost, this bill would increase the 10-year deficit by $2.65 trillion—$20,000 per household—adding to current inflationary pressures.

A small sampling of this year’s rancid pork includes:

  • $1.5 million to encourage people to eat outdoors in sunny Pasadena, California.
  • $1.1 million for a solar array in cloudy Kirkland, Washington.
  • $2 million for B360, a group that promotes dirt-bike culture in Baltimore.

You will PAY OFF student loan debt.. Even though the Supreme Court blocked Biden’s student forgiveness plan, he intends to make YOU fund it in this Bill.




Breaking — Kari Lake election lawsuit is going to trial !…

by Patriots Staff

It appears that a judge may finally see the forest of fraud in American elections. Katy Hobbs attempts to dismiss the case have failed. She was responsible for certifying her own election, how obvious is that?. Desperate to stop Lake, the only thing the deep state could do was put the voting centers out of commission blocking thousands of Lake supporters. But now the bill is due and hopefully AZ will soon have its rightful governor !

Breaking — Kari Lake election lawsuit is going to trial…

Kari Lake has been vocal about contesting the results of the 2022 gubernatorial election in Arizona. Now her case is going to trial.

Two claims are moving forward to trial. The first is related to chain of custody challenges and the second is related to intentional malice regarding widespread breakdowns of equipment.


Twitter Kept Prominent Covid Critics on Secret ‘Blacklist’ to Keep Americans from Getting Second Opinions

by Becker News

Twitter kept secret “blacklists” that included a doctor at Stanford and several prominent conservative voices that suppressed their ability to be found or heard on the social media platform, according to journalist Bari Weiss, founder and editor of The Free Press and former Wall Street Journal and New York Times columnist, who launched the second chapter in Elon Musk’s so-called “Twitter Files” Thursday evening.

Weiss tweeted what appeared to be a photo of Stanford University’s Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a professor of health policy, with his account being prominently marked as being under a “Trends Blacklist.” Bhattacharya was secretly blacklisted because he “argued that Covid lockdowns would harm children,” and was thus unable to trend on the platform, according to Weiss.

In addition to Bhattacharya, Twitter placed Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk under a “Do Not Amplify” notice, while right wing talk radio personality Dan Bongino, who has appeared on Alex Jones’ InfoWars, was placed under a “Search Blacklist,” according to Weiss. The practice of limiting the access or reach of users’ content, commonly referred to as “shadow banning,” is something that Twitter has denied doing in the past, and is referred to internally as “Visibility Filtering” or “VF,” Weiss reported.

Branson vs Adam accepted by Supreme Court to overturn 2020 Election

by Patriots Staff


This is NOW real. It is on supremecourt.gov. The court will hold a Jan 6th hearing to see whether or not they will take the case.

Branson vs Adam accepted by Supreme Court to overturn 2020 election

From the plaintiff’s Questions:

"QUESTIONS PRESENTED

A serious conflict exists between decisions rendered from along with this Court and lower appeal courts, constitutional provisions and statutes, in deciding whether or not the trial court has jurisdiction to try the merits of this case.

This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States. In addition there are two doctrines that conflict with each other found in this case affecting every court in this country. These doctrines are known as the doctrine of equitable maxim and the doctrine of the object principle of justice. Equitable maxim created by this court, which the lower court used to dismiss this case, sets in direct violation of the object principle of justice also partially created by this Court and supported by other appeal courts and constitutional provisions.

These conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court to resolve these conflicts, which has not, but should be, settled by this Court without delay.  A serious conflict exists between decisions rendered from along with this Court and lower appeal courts, constitutional provisions and statutes, in deciding whether or not the trial court has jurisdiction to try the merits of this case. This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States. In addition there are two doctrines that conflict with each other found in this case affecting every court in this country. These doctrines are known as the doctrine of equitable maxim and the doctrine of the object principle of justice. Equitable maxim created by this court, which the lower court used to dismiss this case, sets in direct violation of the object principle of justice also partially created by this Court and supported by other appeal courts and constitutional provisions. These conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court to resolve these conflicts, which has not, but should be ,settled by this Court without delay."

It should ALSO be noted that 388 members of Congress are included as DEFENDANTS