by Patriots Staff

We’ve all heard the scuttlebutt for the last year and a half how the 2020 election was stolen but where is the evidence? It’s about time the public learns that there is an active attempt to hide evidence the election was stolen. Look at this: Erroneous Code Present On Tennessee Dominion Election System Software After EAC Certified It !  The best example of machine fraud yet but it is denied that fraud swung the 2020 election. It is just cited as another error. How many times will we swallow that line?

There is further evidence contained in a court ordered forensic analysis of Dominion voting machines in the 2020 Antrim county lawsuit available here:  https://www.depernolaw.com/bailey-june-2021.html. One of the analysis reports listed there indicates that the Dominion machine was connected to both Germany and Taiwan during the election. Dominion has claimed their machines are not connected to the internet but they have to be to report the tabulated results.

How about the US CISA warning:  “Dominion voting machines used in 16 states have ‘substantial vulnerabilities. “ An excerpt from the article states: ”The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency, or CISA, said there is no evidence the flaws in the Dominion Voting Systems’ equipment have been exploited to alter election results.” Really?  How is it then that there could be contradicting evidence of fraud, not just another random error ?  Look at Georgia where a woman didn’t even receive her own vote. This happened in real time in an election; the only reason it was caught is because the candidate complained.

Update:VoterGA Continues to Cite Dominion Election Problems as Woman Who Wasn't On the Ballot Wins and Dem Primary Candidate Receives Zero Votes in Several Counties

So how does a democratic candidate get ZERO votes in her own county in which she and her husband voted without ACTIVE machine intervention?  Obviously, here is real evidence that an unknown software routine was actively working against her election but failed to provide a minimum vote. This is just a small example of what the Dominion machine really can do. It only took two elections to take down Venezuela using Dominion and globalists only need one more here to do the same. 

It’s about time the public learned that there is a coming global government, referred to as the Great Reset as expounded by Klaus Schwab, founder of the world economic forum. World government is also discussed in the book of Genesis with its first leader, Nimrod.  And you can see the various forms this government will assume in the book of Daniel through various stages of history and how it continues to develop into its final form predicted in Revelations.

Dominion has solved the problem of how to limit who can serve in the coming world government by providing the methodology for eliminating other than key personnel not interested in the world’s people or their problems. Machine tabulation is the perfect means to institute selection rather than election where a combination of machine algorithms select the candidate rather than the electorate.

Some Counties are beginning to get the message and document the fraud as was done in Mesa County, Colorado after Dominion performed a ‘trusted build'. Dominion obliterated all fraudulent evidence in the Tina Peters case in Mesas county, Colorado.  Tina had a forensic image of the Dominion machine taken before and after the dominion trusted build. Changing and eliminating election data along with wiping out system LOGs are a violation of federal law that requires election data to be saved for 22 months and renders any machine in-auditable when ever voting problems are identified.  

There are far too many Dominion election data anomalies found around the country to be mere coincidence. The anomalies support what The Daily Beast reports on computer science Professor Alex Halderman and his study on Dominion findings but his report is currently under court seal. Are we all so gullible as to believe the insipid statements that dominion vulnerabilities have not been taken advantage of? But more importantly how is it that a federal judge muzzles information concerning election vulnerabilities in a free society?

Do we really need an election system managed by Dominion personnel where the machines cannot be inspected and election results are tabulated through remote centers simply accepting their word that no fraud has occured? The French continue to vote with only paper ballots and hand counts as they have for generations. Why can’t we?

Otero County, New Mexico is convinced there was fraud by refusing to certify the 2022 primary election results but were compelled to do so by the state Supreme Court. Nowhere to be found is anyone even willing to acknowledge the possibility fraud may be involved. Instead those with concerns are character attacked with statements like being fired for non-compliance with COVID-19 prevention measures,(unwillingness to wear a mask) or citing Griffin, who was convicted last month of trespassing resulting from his prayerful rallying of rioters at the Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021 coup attempt. Jan 6th was a staged federal insurrection to take focus off of election integrity and the canvassing of registered voters as a “vigilante” effort that could further undermine public faith in elections. Voter confidence in elections is already undermined and getting worse. It's this attempted character assasination driving it. People in a free society have the right to choose other than electronic voting for any reason. People recognize this as a concerted effort to cover up electronic fraud concerns with no real attempt to addess the concerns.

Apparently Otero County cannot abandon the Dominion voting machine and that alone tells you something is very wrong with the system.. Hopefully, more counties will step up because we can never have another stolen election and preserve our American Republic.

Joe Biden and his nasty kid have given every one a taste of what any global government could be like with electronic voting the way to axhieve it. Why continue to use a system that can be taken advantage of and likely has already especially in critical races?

If electronic voting is NOT abandoned by the states by November of 2022, the American Republic will be finished.

by Staff

Here is an interesting election twist, Linda Arnold who wasn't on the Fulton County, GA Fistrict 7 School Board Primary Ballot Garners the most votes as reported by Garland Favorito of VoterGA on FrankSpeech.com. But readers should note that there continues to be no evidence of election fraud according to GA election Officials.

Frank Speech down battot results

In futher News coming out of Georgia. More bad news for Dominion.. the machine allowing candidates to be selected NOT elected. A local county commssioner race in DeKlab County, where one of the candidates received zero votes in several counties, led to complaints for a recount of election results where it was discovered the Dominion Machine counts were thousands of votes LESS than the actual count ! 

Secretary of State Brad Raffensburger subsequently admitted to a programming error in the Dominion software leading to this discrepancy.

How does DeKlab County's hand recount connect to all of this? Tune in to find out!  https://cdn.frankspeech.com/DOMINIONISBUSTEDGeorgiaHandCou/mp4/DOMINIONISBUSTEDGeorgiaHandCou_audio.mp3

ELECTION INTEGRITY BILL BLOCKED ON FINAL VOTE

The good news in the recently completed General Assembly session is that we were successful at stopping Brad Raffensperger’s attempt to lift the ban on private money and eliminate non-partisan poll watching. The bad news is that Gov. Brian Kemp and Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan blocked the SB89 election integrity bill just before it became law.

Primary Dominion

by Revolver News

As Revolver and others have covered, Nina “Moaning Myrtle” Jankowicz is a joke. The Harry Potter superfan-turned-propagandrix is now the Biden Administration’s chosen head for the “Disinformation Governance Board.” Among many other embarrassing videos in circulation is the following clip of Nina Jankowicz bizarrely and emphatically dismissing the notion of the so-called “deep state.”

There is no deep state. Nina says so. pic.twitter.com/WY7h7SKhWW

— Maze (@mazemoore) May 2, 2022

For those who can’t stand uptalk, here’s what she said in the video:

Talking about the deep state and things like that which is a thread among conspiracy communities here in the United States, that there is this secret cabal here in Washington working to undermine the American people couldn’t be further from the truth, as someone who works with and around these public servants every day.

Whatever one thinks of the precise term “deep state,” Nina badly wants everyone to dismiss the very concept of secret groups operating within Washington. She works “with and around” them after all, and she says such a cabal or network of cabals does not exist.

In fact, Nina does know the truth, and it’s the opposite of what she claims above. Nina’s name appeared in one of the most explosive and aggressively censored national security leaks of the century. The leak in question exposed the “Integrity Initiative,” a dark government-funded NGO that appears to have engaged in political meddling and covert influence operations in Western countries under the guise of fighting “disinformation.”

Founded in mid-2015 under the auspices of the U.K. government-funded NGO “Institute for Statecraft,” the Integrity Initiative boasted a precociously fashionable motto: “Defending Democracy Against Disinformation.”

In its organization, funding, operation, structure, and rhetoric the Integrity Initiative is the single best template for understanding how the entire hornets’ nest of NGOs, journalists, and “national security” bureaucrats work secretly and in concert to wage psychological warfare against citizens of the West. One cannot understand how the Disinformation Industry functions without understanding the little-known (and now defunct) Integrity Initiative. 

Thankfully, before its demise, hackers leaked a huge swath of internal documents from the Integrity Initiative. More on that leak in a moment, but for now, here is an official description of the “clusters” from one of those leaked documents:

Full text transcribed here for readability (emphasis ours):

The network of networks:

The Integrity Initiative was set up in autumn 2015 by the Institute for Statecraft in cooperation with the Free University of Brussels (VUB) to bring to the attention of politicians, policy-makers, opinion leaders and other interested parties the threat posed by Russia to democratic institutions in the United Kingdom, across Europe and North America

The Integrity Initiative Aims to unite people who understand the threat, in order to provide a coordinated Western response to Russian disinformation and other elements of hybrid warfare.

The nature of this response needs to render counter productive the Russian tactic of dividing countries internally and from one another. This will be the case if each Russian information and influence attack provokes the country targeted into sharing analysis of the attack with other countries in the network on a governmental basis, thereby increasing collaboration and Alliance cohesion. NATO’s political Committee can play an important role here.

An effective network is best achieved by forming in each European country a cluster of well-informed people from the political, military, academic,  journalistic and think-tank spheres, who will track and analyze examples of disinformation in their country and inform decision-makers and other interested parties about what is happening.

Nina Jankowicz’s name appears in a 2018 leak as a member of the “inner core” of the Integrity Initiative’s U.K. Cluster, specifically in the sub-group dedicated to Russia.

Another name that appears alongside Nina Jankowicz’s in the leaked documents as a member of the “inner core” of the U.K. cluster dealing with Russia is Anne Applebaum. Revolver briefly touched upon Applebaum’s apparent involvement in the Integrity Initiative in an earlier piece.

Read More: Dark New Dem Bill Uses “Counter American Intelligence” To Wage War on MAGA

Applebaum was last seen refusing to comment on the coordinated cover-up of Hunter Biden’s laptop. Applebaum’s apparent fellow “inner core” cluster wingman Nina Jankowicz repeatedly amplified the U.S. intelligence community’s discredited claim that the Hunter Biden laptop was a Russian disinformation operation:

Read more

by KANE

SOURCE — Kim Strassel WSJ

Special Counsel John Durham steps into court Monday with the first trial of his probe into Democrats’ Russia-collusion hoax. That’s a formality. Mr. Durham has already won.

 Perkins Coie lawyer Michael Sussmann stands accused of lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation by claiming the dirt on Donald Trump he fed to the FBI wasn’t delivered on behalf of “any client.” Mr. Sussmann was in the pay of the Hillary Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee and worked extensively with outside players and the media to produce the collusion narrative as well as documents that stoked FBI probes of Mr. Trump’s 2016 campaign, according to Durham filings. Mr. Sussmann has pleaded not guilty.

Commentators spent last week warring over whether Judge Christopher Cooper’s rulings on the use of evidence would help or hinder Mr. Durham’s case. It doesn’t much matter. Mr. Durham has already accomplished his far bigger goal with this narrow indictment. He’s put every sleazy collusion player in the hot seat, with ramifications beyond the courtroom.

From the day the special counsel released the 27-page Sussmann indictment in September (and the follow-on charges against dossier contributor Igor Danchenko), it’s been clear he had ambitions that went far beyond a conviction for lying. Each of his filings follows the same, deliberate strategy—lengthy briefs and long exhibits full of names, emails and documents, all of which connect the dots and expose the web that enabled this hoax, and the lies that kept it hidden.

Democratic superlawyer Marc Elias isn’t charged, but he also no longer heads the elite political-law practice at Perkins Coie. The firm last August announced Mr. Elias, who’d been there 28 years, was leaving to start his own small practice. A few weeks later, the Sussmann indictment laid bare the role Mr. Elias, a longtime DNC and Clinton lawyer, played in ginning up and distributing the bogus Trump-Russia claims.

Christopher Steele, author of the infamous dossier, once lauded by the press as an international superspy, is now a man in search of a reputation. His dossier’s “intelligence,” Mr. Durham’s documents show, came primarily from a Brookings Institution employee, Mr. Danchenko, who was recycling salacious chatter from a Clinton associate. Whatever work Mr. Steele may find in future, it won’t include assisting the FBI or any other respectable agency.

Fusion GPS, which hired Mr. Steele, has become toxic in Washington. The Durham prosecutions show how the opposition-research firm operates—not by producing real research, but by shopping seamy claims to law enforcement, then browbeating journalists into covering the “investigations” Fusion inspires. (Fusion in court filings says its job was to help Perkins Coie with legal advice—a claim the judge largely rejected Thursday.) The Washington press corps knows it got played—and how. A recent Durham filing released dozens of emails showing reporters at top outlets palling it up with their Fusion narrators, with one Slate writer even sending a draft October 2016 article for Fusion to review. Is the DNC going to hire Fusion anytime soon? Even credulous reporters will think twice before running with another Fusion lead.

Mrs. Clinton won’t be in the courtroom, but the campaign’s claims it was in the dark about the Perkins Coie and Fusion work are in ashes. Mr. Durham’s evidence shows top Clinton aides—including campaign manager Robby Mook—were apprised of allegations and helped circulate them. Also among the circulators was current national security adviser Jake Sullivan, who faces calls to resign given his role.

Then there’s James Comey’s FBI. One downside of the Durham “lying” strategy is that it requires prosecutors to present the FBI as dupes of the Clinton operation. Yet amusingly, this has lured the defense into providing evidence of FBI rot. Mr. Sussmann’s lawyers will argue at trial that their client can’t be found guilty of lying to the FBI, since “they have reviewed more than 300 emails that show the bureau understood Sussmann worked for Democratic campaign entities,” as the Washington Post reports. 

The FBI knew all along and ran with unvetted political dirt, even if Mr. Sussmann’s alleged lie allowed it to pretend it was aboveboard. And as the Durham evidence shows, it went on pretending, failing to follow up on Mr. Steele, the dossier or its Clinton origins until long after the election (at which point special counsel Robert Mueller failed to follow up on the FBI for nearly two years more). Most of the FBI’s former leaders have been fired or left, its reputation is in tatters, and the GOP will dig further if it regains Congress this fall.

Many conservatives remain frustrated that Mr. Durham hasn’t pursued far more sweeping conspiracy charges. But conspiracy cases are hard to prove. A sweeping prosecution of high-name figures would cause a political feeding frenzy, and be proclaimed by the media a partisan exercise. A court loss would make it easier for the press to cast the entire effort as debunked.

The narrow prosecution of the little-known Mr. Sussmann has allowed for a focus on the bigger story. Stay tuned for a flood of more information coming out of a trial that on its face is about one lawyer, but in reality is the continuing tale of one of the dirtiest tricks in modern U.S. history.