BREAKING: Georgia Investigators have ‘Ballot Trafficker’ Who Is Talking — Admits to Being Paid THOUSANDS of dollars in 2020 Election Boxes Ballot Harvesting Scheme — 242 Ballot Traffickers Detected

by Jim Hoft

Alleged ballot trafficker making the rounds in Georgia in 2020

Radio host John Fredericks joined Steve Bannon back in September to discuss an EXPLOSIVE development in Georgia.

According to John Fredericks, investigators have video of 240 leftist operatives he called “ballot traffickers” dumping tens of thousands of ballots into drop boxes in the middle of the night in locations across Georgia.


On Tuesday Just the News reported that one of the ballot traffickers was identified and is now talking. According to Just the News the man WAS PAID THOUSANDS to harvest ballots in Georgia.

The group also said it interviewed a Georgia man who admitted he was paid thousands of dollars to harvest ballots in the Atlanta metropolitan area during the November election and the lead-up to Jan. 5, 2021 runoff for Georgia’s two U.S. Senate seats, which were both captured by Democrats and ended GOP control of Congress. The group has yet to identify the cooperating witness to state authorities, referring to him in the complaint simply as John Doe.

The group does not allege the ballots delivered by couriers were fraudulent. Nonetheless, lawful ballots delivered by third-parties to drop boxes would run afoul of Georgia’s law.

True the Vote is wise not to release the identity of the ballot traffickers to Georgia State Officials considering they certified a fraudulent election.

We are reaching out to True the Vote for comment…

READ the Entire Story

EXCLUSIVE SMOKING GUN: Lawsuit Reveals Fulton County 2020 Absentee Ballot Results Were Physically Impossible and Files Were Modified

by Joe Hoft

The following report summarizes an analysis of 2020 Election ballots scanned in Fulton County.   This exclusive report uncovered thousands of questionable ballots. 

There are numerous questions related to what happened in the State Farm Arena in Fulton County Georgia during the 2020 Election.  The Arena was used as the Fulton County ballot processing center and is where reportedly all 148,318 absentee ballots were scanned.

Ballots processed in the Arena were expected to be authenticated first.  Voters were to be identified on voter logs and then signature verification was to take place.  The ballots were then to be separated from their envelopes and arranged in batches of approximately 100.  Each batch was then scanned using one of the five Cannon DR-G2140 high-speed machines [as can be observed in video from the Arena on Election night.]  The image of each ballot was simultaneously created and saved.

As a result of a previous lawsuit, Fulton County produced scanned absentee ballot image files which were then made public and have been under review by various individuals and groups.

One individual examining the data (RonC) identified something he could not explain.  The image files have timestamps that are recorded as the ballots are being scanned.  Those timestamps reveal that the image files were created faster than the physical capacity of the scanners used in the process.  In many cases, several times faster.

The manual for the Cannon DR-G2140 lists the specifications on page 23:

The manual for the Cannon DR-G2140 lists the specifications on page 23:

The manual shows the machine has a maximum capability of scanning up to 140 document sheets per minute, or roughly 2.3 pages per second.  This rate is based on scanning standard 8 ½ X 11-inch paper.  The absentee ballots are more than one and a half times this length at 18 inches long.

Using the State Farm Arena surveillance video, a group of professionals analyzing the data measured the actual realized scan times which averaged approximately 80 seconds per batch (under perfect conditions with no paper jams or complications).  Which equates to approximately 1.25 ballots per second.

However, the image timestamps show something different.  Below is a spreadsheet of sample data that has the timestamp of each ballot image as it was created.  This information came from Fulton County and was produced in the court case above.

Below is image data of actual ballots scanned by unit 5162 on 11-05-2020.

The timestamps in the red boxes above show 8 ballots scanned in the same second, followed by 6 ballots in the very next second.  Fourteen ballots in 2 seconds!?!?

This shows that the ballot images were created at a speed that is physically IMPOSSIBLE.

These results are not possible.

The same scenario is replete throughout the image files and affects thousands of ballots.  These results certainly aren’t expected or “normal”.

The group of professionals talked to several experts about these anomalies.  Given the specifics, such as the files being saved on Ethernet-connected, high-performance network drives, and other specific technical parameters of the arrangement, there remains no clear and justifiable cause for these timestamps.  Even if one considers lag-time, buffering, or some type of computer processor or network-caused “ebb and flow”, it does not explain the impossible scan times, even when averaging all images in each batch.

There’s more.  If we expand the same dataset to include the modified file timestamps, we reveal additional problems:

The only instance in which a ballot image file should be modified is if it has gone through the adjudication process.  Adjudication is when the machine cannot determine the voter’s selections for various reasons and the ballot is supposed to be sent to a bi-partisan team who looks at the markings and attempts to interpret the voter’s intent. The team votes and if they agree, the original image is supplemented to reflect the decision.

The modified timestamps shown above reveal that all of the files were modified.

Again, the ballot images should not be modified unless processed for adjudication. Adjudication should only be used only in rare circumstances.  [We’re not sure of the official percent but we believe adjudication should only occur in less than 2% of all ballots processed.] Perhaps there is a reasonable explanation for all of these ballots being adjudicated. Maybe this was caused by a technicality only affecting these ballots?  But the images appear to have been all modified at the same time, and within only one hour of scanning.

If we zoom out to the 30,000-foot level and look at all batches from the same scanner as shown below, we see a much larger problem.  First, all of the batches have been modified as shown on the far right. The scan times for each batch are in yellow and the numbers shown in red are the amount of time (hours) between when the batch was scanned and when the batch was modified.

For example, batch 001 was finished being scanned at 1:51 pm on 10/22.  That same batch was modified 192 hours later at 1:38 pm on 10/30.

The batch was scanned and then modified 8 DAYS LATER.

On scanner 5150, a total of 44 batches were modified between 3 to 8 days after being scanned. Not only is such a large window of time used to process ballots inexplicable, but it is also unacceptable. Unfortunately, these findings show extreme variations in the process, are widespread, and cannot be dismissed or ignored.

Important is the last 4 batches shown on the page had 0 hours between the scan time and modification time.  In fact, the last 4 batches scanned were modified before the previous 44 batches. This removes the possibility of some type of consistent procedure or forced process causing the modification of all batches on the same date.

Remember, the findings above only show the anomalies associated with one of the five machines used to scan absentee ballots, a process that continued until November 5th(More to come soon on the significance of the time between scanning and file modification time.)

Attempting to seek understanding and answers for his findings, RonC went to the logical government entity charged with such matters- the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections (BRE).

RonC summarized his findings in an email that detailed the scan speed and image file modification issues. The BRE then sought answers from the County Elections Director, Rick Barron. The email below shows Mr. Barron’s response to the board:

There are 4 basic takeaways from Mr. Barron’s email.

First, it’s obvious that Mr. Barron feels the same about the impossible scanning speed and went so far as to describe RonC’s finding as “bizarre”.  The problem is this was not simply a “claim” as characterized by Mr. Barron, rather a factual observation of Fulton County’s data.

Secondly, Mr. Barron directly states:  “You can’t modify ballot images that aren’t adjudicated.”  Again, he affirms our understanding and expectations.

Third, he states that the equipment is proprietary, and the security manuals are not available. In his defense, Mr. Barron was probably referencing the election system as a whole or in a general connotation; however, the scanners used were Cannon consumer-off-the-shelf machines that can be purchased through numerous retailers.

Finally, we did follow Mr. Barron’s advice to observe the scanners in operation by watching the State Farm Arena surveillance video.  He was correct, the scanners are slow.  In fact, they are so slow that the ballot images produced by the scanner are created faster than the machine can scan the ballots, and that truly is “bizarre”.

There is more to this story.

Kevin Moncla

“RonC” contributed to this report

Rev 13 Becoming Reality as EU Parliament votes Vaccine Passport, watch for 'VAX to Vote' as Condition in US.

by Allen Williams

The Telegraph has an explosive story that places the Covid-19 Wuhan virus squarely in the hands of the Communist Chinese.

Placeholder image for youtube video x93BUXli5HM

"COVID-19 is an "unrestricted bio-weapon" that slipped from a Wuhan facility. This claim was according to a Chinese virologist who fled to the United States after claiming that China covered up the coronavirus epidemic.

Dr. Li Meng-Yan, a whistleblower, claims that a trove of Dr. Anthony Fauci's emails backs up her assertions. In an interview with Newsmax, the Chinese whistleblower said she had emailed Dr. Anthony Fauci about her theory and "discovery."

Dr. Li published research on her claims and discoveries on COVID-19's origins in the Wuhan bio lab last year. A Chinese virologist was one of the researchers who looked at it. Science Times reported that her studies were shut down and removed. It forced her to flee for her safety. Dr. Yan has been barred from social media since then for "misinformation."  -

Despite Boris Johnson's assurances that Britain would have no vaccine passport, it has now become a reality. "Wow" — that's what one MP exclaimed when the vote on vaccine passports was declared." A new era of warfare is exploding on the scene to set up the biblical scenario described in the bible using the concept of biological weapons where people will accept loss of freedom for supposed safety from engineered harm.

"There should now be no doubt that China has had an active and extensive biological warfare program of which COVID-19 was one of its “biotechnological weapons”

You can see a World government coming from Daniel 2, Daniel 7 and the words of Jesus Christ in Matthew 24 and Revelation 13 which predicts a one world global government in which bread alone will cost a day's wages.

Expect that a unique program of only 'the vaccinated may vote' to soon emerge in the United States, perhaps as early as 2022, as the puppet BIden Administration will need to 'guarantee' the next election from the exposed 2020 machine and other fraud. Of course, this would never be considered as voter disenfranchisement'. 

What more effective means under a never ending virus threat could ensure a globalist victory?

Arizona Election Fraud: 2 Months After They Were Identified Illegally Deleting 2020 Election Records, Three Individuals Remain Unpunished, Unidentified and Uncharged by AG Mark Brnovich

By Jordan Conradson

Arizona Election Fraud: 2 Months After They Were Identified Illegally Deleting 2020 Election Records, Three Individuals Remain Unpunished, Unidentified and Uncharged by AG Mark Brnovich

The Arizona 2020 Election Audit concluded with hundreds of thousands of ballot discrepancies, chain of custody failures, nonexistent signature verification, and clear-cut violations of the law.

The Gateway Pundit reported exclusively on the Improper Governmental Operations Report by We The People AZ Alliance. They detail the video review where one individual granted two others access to the server room and leaves them unattended at the approximate time the log shows files being deleted in April. 

All evidence has been presented to the Arizona Attorney General and he has opened a formal criminal investigation. However, we continue to see him slow-walk the process more than two months later with no arrests made to date.

Why haven’t these three individuals been arrested?

The Gateway Pundit reported that former Maricopa County Recorder was questioned by an investigator and he may even get arrested, but who knows at this point?

A very large very expensive very complicated forensic audit was held in Maricopa County, AZ. It took months to get it going, then months to complete it. In the end, it produced several reports, and one criminal investigation by the AZ AG, Mark Brnovich.

The names and footage remain redacted for the public, but the Attorney General has received the unredacted recordings and reports that identify these individuals.

Mark Brnovich received all reports on September 24th when the Audit report was presented to the public.

Nobody knows what Brnovich is waiting for.

The election was stolen in Arizona and President Trump is right to be calling for immediate decertification.

BREAKING – PRESIDENT TRUMP: “What Ever Happened To The RIGGED And STOLEN Arizona Presidential Election, When Will The Legislature Vote To Decertify?”

President Trump released a new statement this morning as the American people anxiously await Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich’s investigation into the fraudulent 2020 election. The evidence from the Arizona Senate’s full forensic election audit has been delivered to Attorney General Brnovich and he has opened a formal criminal investigation into the crime of the … Continue reading

No matter what state you live in, contact Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich to demand immediate arrests for these criminals.

Contact AG Mark Brnovich