Maricopa County Roving Attorney Observations Report Nov 8, 2022

by Mark Sonnenklar


Ten to eighteen RNC attorneys were involved in monitoring the Arizona 2022 election. Below is an exact copy of this report. It has been posted on 'SCRIBE D'.  A very important report by roving RNC attorneys covering AZ voting locations in the recent election demonstrating systemic corruption. The link I've included allows you to download a copy for yourself. You are fee to circulate is as you see fit; the more the better.  The news media certainly isn't going to reveal that these voting machines are a clever way to select candidates that the elites want and that translates to NO populist candidates at anytime.

The full report is also available on the Daily Caller site: https://dailycaller.com/2022/11/21/maricopa-maricopa-tabulator-ballot-memo/ and may be down loaded. The executive summary of the 22 page report has documented unprecedented anomalies.which identify the system corruption in every segment of the process.

[Each day there is growing evidence that the 'Uniparty', consisting of both Dems and RNC people, are involved in a deep deception maintaining that machine based elections are fair. These people resist every effort to reform or correct the situation because they need the corruption to elect only those they prefer; the people's wishes no longer matter. We are rapidly moving towards a machine controlled society that Orwell warned of in his book 1984. The fact that these people use every means (legal or otherwise) by preventing the evidence from being presented in open court, denying the machines receive physical inspection (to perpetuate black box voting) reveals the true intent is fraud. The media runs an endless propaganda campaign claiming any objection to electronic voting is 'conspiracy theory' to create the false notion that nothing is amiss - ED]

Page 2


The machines need to go, paper only voting. One more fraudulent election will finish America. Revealing the 2021 election fraud is our last chance to save it. If you're too busy to resist the fraud note well that you will have no country and NO freedom.





California police stole $17,000 from these sisters !!!

by Hannah Cox & Brad Polumbo

Civil asset forfeiture is so unethical that most people won’t believe it’s true.

Did you know police steal more from Americans every year than burglars do?

Civil asset forfeiture (CAF) is a legal practice so bad and so unethical that most people won’t believe it’s true until they read up on it. But under this system, police are allowed to take your property if they even just suspect you of a crime (No, not charge you with a crime. No, not convict you for a crime. Suspect). And they basically just get to keep it unless you have the ability (i.e. the funds) to challenge them in court and prove your innocence.

It’s a total perversion of our Constitution, which is supposed to ensure individuals are innocent until proven guilty and which places the burden of that proof on the accuser (the state).

Recently, Vera and Apollonia Ward had a run-in with the CAF system. The women run a successful dog-breeding business and sent $17,500 via Fedex to purchase two additional dogs. But the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Office seized the funds and accused the women of drug-trafficking. Never mind the fact that they had all the documentation needed to back-up their story, never mind the fact that police had no evidence whatsoever of their involvement in the drug-market.

“To me, it felt like being treated like a criminal, even though you’re not, it makes you question everything,” Vera said. “They tried their hardest to intimidate us, and to say that we’re basically putting our freedom on the line: ‘Give us this money, we’ll make it go away—or put your freedom on the line for it,” Vera continued.


But the women wanted to fight. Fortunately, they got in touch with pro-bono, constitutional litigators at the Goldwater Institute in Arizona who agreed to take on their case. And within a few months, the government had to return the money.

But this is their game. Police regularly use CAF to bully people out of their money and other property, and they mostly get away with it because (without pro-bono attorneys) the average person can’t afford to fight the government. The government has endless, tax-payer funded resources at its disposal, and its attorneys can easily run up the clock for those attempting to pay a defense attorney by the hour to get their money back. Police then get to keep these funds and add them to their budget much of the time.

CAF is not only a disgustingly unconstitutional law, it also leads to really corrupt police behavior. When police get to profit off the property they discover on people just because they merely suspect them of a crime, they are far more apt to behave like road pirates—targeting and profiling certain kinds of cars and finding reasons to search people and their cars. They should be focusing their time on solving and preventing violent crimes, but instead, we see a vast amount of their resources go to these endeavors instead.

All of this, unsurprisingly, traces back to the War on Drugs. Politicians and police argue that police need this authority to stop high-profile drug lords and their drug trafficking operations. It’s a bogus argument of course. The vast majority of these seizures were for less than $1000 and against people who were never even charged with a crime.

Bottom line, police should never be able to take a person’s property until they have been convicted of a crime. There’s really no ethical or constitutional if, ands, or buts about it. CAF needs to be outlawed at both the federal and state level, and you should pay close attention to the police, District Attorneys, and other politicians that benefit from this system working to keep it in place.

Litigators at places like The GoldWater Institute are heroes fighting the bad guys. Ironically, that’s what we pay the police to do.

Bottom line, police should never be able to take a person’s property until they have been convicted of a crime. There’s really no ethical or constitutional if, ands, or buts about it. CAF needs to be outlawed at both the federal and state level, and you should pay close attention to the police, District Attorneys, and other politicians that benefit from this system working to keep it in place.

Litigators at places like The GoldWater Institute are heroes fighting the bad guys. Ironically, that’s what we pay the police to do.

Hannah Coxhttp://based-politics.com

Hannah Cox is a libertarian-conservative writer and co-founder of BASEDPolitics. She's also the host of the BASEDPolitics podcast and an experienced political activist.
Hannah Cox





Wisconsin County Takes Election Control Away From Dominion But still using Their Software. How Does this Help secure Anything?

by Patriot's Staff


This is a first start but major questions still remain. (1) Will your machine have an updated voter role sans the dead, nonresidents, minors, etc? (2) Taking control MEANS that you will NOT use dominion software or you are just deceiving residents. A manual vote count will NOT catch machine manipulations; so who is going to warch the programmer to ensure he isn’t the one flipping votes, etc?  The article term used suggests this is the LITE version of Dominion software. Do you have access to inspect it? If not, how stupid is this? What’s the difference if Domimion or county officials run the machines?  What tolerances will you allow on the differences between what the machine tabulated and your hand tallies?

The machine is stealing the election and can do so regardless of the operator. What’s the difference in hand counting the ballots with a machine you are running and simply hand counting a manual ballot election? NONE. And you save $70,000 in machine software upgrades.  (3) How is all of this staying ahead of potential fraud?

The only SAFE election method is to use paper ballots and hand counts. Checking other’s programming operations is just a variation of 3-Card Monte.

Source: Huge” Wisconsin County Takes Control Away rom Dominion – Approves Hand Recount of Governor, Lieutenant Governor and U.S. Senator Race in November Election


Oregon County Suing Voter Group to STOP examination of 2020 ballots admits system can be hacked!

by Dr. Douglas G. Frank


"Oregon Lawsuit Update"

I am going to be testifying in Washington County, Oregon this week.

This is an important case, because the SoS and AG have admitted in formal court documents that their machines are wirelessly accessible, and that in addition to their STATE elections being compromised, our NATIONAL elections can also be compromised because the devices are **wirelessly accessible*** even when they are not connected to local networks.

And Oregon is not alone. Election officials in other states have made similar admissions, not to mention the system vendors themselves.

Of course, this is what we have been saying for twenty months now, despite the false and misleading mantra, “The machines are not connected to the internet.”

Ignorant election officials think that because their machines are not hard wired, or not connected to a local hotspot, or are “air-gapped,” or only connected to “internal secure networks” that their elections are secure.

This reveals so much ignorance on the topic that it makes me question their qualifications or their integrity, and wonder if they are complicit.

The internal modems can simply connect to any convenient hotspot or a local cell tower.

And we know they do… we have electronic recordings of it taking place.