by Joe Hoft
A group of Wisconsin activists announced their intent to remove every single Wisconsin politician who votes against decertifying the 2020 Election results in the state.
The group ‘Wisconsin Citizens Demanding Election Security’ has announced their plans to remove from office every politician who votes against decertifying the 2020 Election in the state. The group shared:
Today, charter members of Wisconsin Citizens Demanding Election Integrity (WCDEI) issued an open letter, putting Wisconsin’s Republican state legislators on notice that their coalition will work for the removal of those officials who do not now quickly move to decertify November 2020 election results.Below is their press release:
WI Open Letter Press Release 3.10.22 by Jim Hoft on Scribd
WISCONSIN CITIZENS DEMANDING ELECTION INTEGRITY
In addition, the group sent a letter to all Wisconsin Republicans in the State Assembly and Senate notifying them that they will be removed from office if they continue to do nothing.
As citizens leaders determined to restore honesty and integrity in Wisconsin elections, we have two crucial questions for you:
First: On which side of history do wish to stand?
Second: Will you now personally act to decertify Wisconsin’s fraud-ridden 2020 general election results, or will you opt to go down with a quickly sinking ship of corruption?
Decide now. Your seat at the State Capitol and your personal reputation both now hang in the balance. Our patience with stalling and dismissal has evaporated—and we are not alone.
by Kane
[First, it s NOT a secret report. This is the investigation by Michigan computer scientist J. Halderman and a judge sealed the document to keep the report from the republic. In his investigation, Halderman documented the fraud capabilites of the Dominion voting machine which is why Dominion is blocking the results from the 'most secure election in the country's history' - ED]
EPOCH TIMES
Top officials at a U.S. federal cybersecurity agency are urging a
judge not to authorize the release of a report that analyzes Dominion
Voting Systems equipment in Georgia, arguing doing so could assist
hackers trying to “undermine election security.” [or prevent anyone from finding out that the 2020 election was already HACKED! - ED] he Cybersecurity and
Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was recently provided an
unredacted copy of the report, which was prepared by J. Alex Halderman,
director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and
Society.
The report discusses “potential vulnerabilities in Dominion ImageCast X ballot marking devices,” or electronic voting devices, according to the government.
While CISA supports public disclosure of any vulnerabilities with election equipment, allowing the release of the report at this point “increases the risk that malicious actors may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities and threaten election security,” government lawyers said in a Feb. 10 filing.
The case was brought by good-government groups and voters who say the
lack of paper ballots undermines the voting process. U.S. District
Judge Amy Totenberg, an Obama nominee overseeing the case, was urged by
CISA to reject attempts to release a rdacted version of Halderman’s
report for now.
CISA officials want to review the information in the report
and help Dominion resolve the vulnerabilities identified before the
report is released. [How can that be done? [Dominion doesn't want anyone looking inside their machines. Remember the voting machines were invented by three Venezuellans with the intent to steal elections. - ED]
They said they weren’t able to provide a date by which they’ll be finished. [You can bet it will be after the Nov 2024 election, if aver !. - ED]
Totenberg must weigh the request against the wishes of Georgia Secretary State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican and one of the defendants, who called in late January for the release to happen immediately.
John Poulos, Dominion’s CEO and president, said in a statement
released by Raffensperger’s office that Halderman’s review lacked “a
holistic approach,” adding that Dominion “supports all efforts to bring
real facts and evidence forward to defend the integrity of our machines
and the credibility of Georgia’s elections.” [Ha! Ha!. If you believe that I've got a bridge to sell you - ED].
Plaintiffs, including the Coalition for Good Governance, also support the release of the report, David Cross, one of their lawyers, confirmed to The Epoch Times.
The plaintiffs said in a filing before a copy was sent to CISA that the agency should get a copy and begin its evaluation process, but that the evaluation “should not unreasonably delay the public disclosure of the report, which must be promptly disclosed to Georgia state and county election officials, and filed on the public docket, so that public officials can secure the upcoming May primary elections.”
They asked Totenberg to order them to file a redacted version of the
report on the docket, which would make it accessible to the public, no
later than March 4.
by Allen Williams
Federal judge Amy Totenberg ruled that Dominion voting machines violated Georgia law back in Oct 11, 2020 in Curling v. Raffensberger. The court filing is available here.
Garland Favorito of VoterGA, a citizen advocacy group reported progress on their lawsuit on Lindelltv, highlighting a number of Dominion system liabilities, most notably its use of 'QR' codes that prevent reading of the voter's candidate selections violating Georgia law. In addition these 'QR" codes can be hacked.
VoterGa's legal plea in Georgia State court:
Now in a VoterGA press release cites New Evidence Reveals GA Audit Fraud and Massive Errors
GateWay pundit reports: Plaintiffs allege Democracy Suite systems fail to comply with the state’s election code, which provides voting systems must “print an elector verifiable paper ballot” and “produce paper ballots which are marked with the elector’s choices in a format readable by the elector.”