Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive 'Web Of Unindicted' Operators at the Heart of January 6

by Revolver News


Six weeks ago, Revolver News published a blockbuster investigative report on Ray Epps — a man who, more than any other individual, appears to be the key unlocking the question of active federal involvement in the so-called “Capitol Siege” of January 6th.

Out of all of the thousands of January 6’s protesters, and the thousands of hours of publicly available footage from that fateful day, Ray Epps has turned out to be perhaps the only person nailed dead to rights confessing on camera to plotting a pre-planned attack on the Capitol. On both January 5 and January 6, Epps announced multiple times, at multiple locations, his upcoming plot to breach the US Capitol. He then spent hours attempting to recruit hundreds of others to join him. On top of it all, Epps was seen leading key people and managing key aspects of the initial breach of the Capitol grounds himself.

It would be one thing if Epps’s repeated calls on January 5 to “go into the Capitol” had simply amounted to bluster. But Epps followed through on his stated mission to shepherd others inside. In clips 4-6 of the above compilation, we see Epps actively orchestrate elements of the very first breach of the Capitol barricades at 12:50 p.m, while Trump still had 20 minutes left in his rally speech.

It is noteworthy that this Ray Epps breach occurs just one minute after Capitol Police began responding to reports of two “pipe bombs” located at DNC and GOP headquarters, respectively. Rather conveniently, the already-handicapped Capitol Police thus had still-fewer resources with which to respond to the barricade breach in question.

While the “pipe bombs” turned out to be a dud, the Ray Epps breach proved fateful. Today, the official stories told by the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the US Justice Department all depict the apparent Ray Epps-orchestrated 12:50 p.m. initial breach of metal barricades as the “Big Bang” event of January 6.

In large part, this description is hardly an exaggeration. Indeed, it was the 12:50 p.m. breach of the Capitol grounds, in conjunction with a handful of suspicious individuals ripping down fencing and signage, that set in motion the conditions allowing for 1/6 to turn from a rally into a riot. 

In this report, we will blow open this network of still-unindicted key operators who appear to have been at work either with or around Ray Epps during the initial Capitol grounds breach. You, dear reader, will be scandalized — though perhaps unsurprised — to learn that none of the actors covered in this report have received attention in the mainstream press, despite their active and indispensable roles in the events of 1/6.

As we explained in detail in our previous report, the FBI originally put Ray Epps’s face on its Capitol Violence “Most Wanted List” on January 8, 2021, just two days after 1/6. They offered a cash reward for information leading to his arrest. In fact, rank-and-file FBI agents initially deemed Epps’s role as an apparent riot organizer so important that they named him Suspect #16—one of the first 20 high-profile FBI targets in a database now packed with more than 500 suspects.

Then, six months later on June 30, 2021, both Revolver News and The New York Times published inconvenient stories that encouraged a more aggressive interrogation of the “Ray Epps third rail,” leading reasonable people to wonder why this publicly identified man on the Most Wanted List still had no charges filed against him.

The FBI responded to these important media stories the very next day. But their response was to quietly purge all online Ray Epps files from their website, then switch to a posture of “What? Who? Ray Epps? Never heard of him.”

Agents of the FBI Field Office in Phoenix (where Epps lives) have gone so far as to explicitly deny knowledge that Ray Epps even exists. Instead of pursuing Epps, FBI agents have instead pursued journalists who had the temerity to ask Epps in person if he was a government operative. “I understand that, but I can’t say anything,” is all Epps would tell them.

Here’s a quick visual synopsis of this timeline:

Then, six months later on June 30, 2021, both Revolver News and The New York Times published inconvenient stories that encouraged a more aggressive interrogation of the “Ray Epps third rail,” leading reasonable people to wonder why this publicly identified man on the Most Wanted List still had no charges filed against him.

The FBI responded to these important media stories the very next day. But their response was to quietly purge all online Ray Epps files from their website, then switch to a posture of “What? Who? Ray Epps? Never heard of him.”

Agents of the FBI Field Office in Phoenix (where Epps lives) have gone so far as to explicitly deny knowledge that Ray Epps even exists. Instead of pursuing Epps, FBI agents have instead pursued journalists who had the temerity to ask Epps in person if he was a government operative. “I understand that, but I can’t say anything,” is all Epps would tell them.

Here’s a quick visual synopsis of this timeline:

The sham Congressional January 6 Commission seems to be going along with the charade of Ray Epps denialism. For all of its recent gesticulations about Mark Meadows’s benign text messages, the Commission has yet to express even a basic interest in Ray Epps or his communications leading up to and on January 6.

But the specter of Ray Epps, and the ominous questions his immunity raises, loom too large to be memory-holed by poorly coordinated efforts of government denial. In light of the above, it is both amusing and symbolically appropriate that despite the FBI’s attempt to purge Epps’s face from its “Wanted” database (and public denials of his existence from authorized agents), the FBI DC Field Office still features Ray Epps as a “Wanted” man in its current pinned Twitter image (look closely and you’ll find it).

If Epps turns out to have been some kind of government operative, which at present is the only clean and simple explanation for his immunity, it is game over for the official “MAGA insurrection” narrative of 1/6. Epps was the day’s loudest riot recruiter, and its apparent leader of the very first breach of Capitol grounds. If Ray Epps is a Fed, the “Insurrection” becomes the “Fedsurrection” in one fell swoop.

So if Ray Epps was instructed by the government to play his part in various recruiting, breaching and crowd control efforts that day, we would expect many other informants to be set up around him.

To test this hypothesis, Revolver spent the past six weeks comprehensively mapping Ray Epps’s network of interactions on January 6, and profiling the key people around him who complemented his efforts. We did a deep dive into other key figures involved in the initial breach of the Capitol grounds, as well as figures who played an instrumental role in fence removal and crowd control. In short, we investigated key players whose early actions on 1/6 turned the rally into a riot.

The bad news for Fedsurrection Deniers is the results are in, and they look even worse for the FBI than Revolver’s already low expectations. For brevity, we profile five of the most egregious cases in this report, and tell the story of how they crossed paths and interacted with, and in some cases coordinated with Ray Epps to make 1/6 possible. Some of these cases are so wild as to constitute Epps-sized scandals unto themselves.


Schwarzenegger: Screw your freedom !!

by Brian Niemietz (Revolver News)


Arnold Schwarzenegger still makes time to let the dumbbells know who’s boss. He also may have lost some fans with an offhand comment about “freedom,” saying only a “moron” or “schmuck” would make taking protective measures against coronavirus political.

The actor and former California governor urged anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers to put the country first during a Wednesday CNN appearance, as COVID-19 continues its deadly spread. He also told stressed that with freedom comes responsibility.

“There is a virus, here,” the 74-year-old bodybuilder said. “It kills people.”

The “Terminator” star was joined by whistleblower and former colonel Alexander Vindman, whom he praised as “my hero” for testifying in former president Donald Trump’s first impeachment hearing. Schwarzenegger called on all Americans to vax, mask, social distance and not view those protective measures as a personal threat.

“‘Well my freedom is being kind of disturbed here,’” Schwarzenegger said, impersonating anti-vaxxer excuses. “Screw ‘your’ freedom. Because with freedom comes implications and responsibilities.”

Continue reading Here:

Arnold Schwarzenegger tells mask skeptics “Screw your freedom”…




'Lead Stories' a supposed fact checking site for Facebook & Twitter funded by the Communist Party

by Staff

The Epoch Times reports that the Fact checking site used by Facebook and Twitter is funded by the communist party through Tic Tok.  "One fact-checker, Lead Stories, is partly paid through its partnership with TikTok, a social media platform run by a Chinese company that owes its allegiance to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)."

"Lead Stories was started in 2015 by Belgian website developer Maarten Schenk, CNN veteran Alan Duke, and two lawyers from Florida and Colorado."

The social media 'fact checker' specializes in debunking claims of false information on such topics as Dominion, Stolen election, machines, vaccines, etc. From USA Today:  "One fact-checker, Lead Stories, is partly paid through its partnership with TikTok, a social media platform run by a Chinese company that owes its allegiance to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)." However lead stories doesn't debunk anything with other than anecdotal opinions not real data that refutes Lindell's arguments.

So it was no big surprise that Alan Duke, a 20 year former CNN reporter who is Lead Stories CEO would take issue with the growing evidence that the US election was hacked by China.  "Dominion Voting Systems is suing Lindell for $1.3 billion, alleging that he made defamatory false statements: that Dominion's machines were used to steal votes. In a Zoom meeting with Lead Stories staff on February 18, 2021, Lindell said he welcomes Dominion's suit and is certain he'll prove Dominion participated in election fraud."  
However, what Duke and the other 'fact checkers' conveniently ignore is the IT forensic data from a court authorized audit of Dominion voting machines. The Lead Attorney Matt Deperno features downloadable Forensic Analysis files documenting Dominion Voting Machine anomalies. And that's not the only claim of Dominion anomalies altering an election.

In Massachusetts, Dr. Shiva, a scientist engineer, was running for the state Senate. He won Franklin county by about 54% because they hand count all ballots. I"There are 351 communities in Massachusetts. Of these, 255 communities use voting machines linked to Dominion (controversy-linked) Software.:"

However, Dr. Shiva lost every other county in the state by the identical ratio of 60/40, a physical impossibility. No lawyer in Massachusetts would take his case so he had to represent himself pro se. Based on the IT analysis he provided the judge refused plaintiff's request to dismiss the suit.   "On October 30, 2020, Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, who represented himself in Federal court as his own counsel before Judge Mark L. Wolf, obtained a landmark victory for Free Speech on Twitter. Testimony unequivocally revealed that the Massachusetts Secretary of State William Galvin, NASED, and its Executive Director Amy Cohen forced Twitter to ban Dr.SHIVA for 21 days, in the midst of his U.S. Senate federal campaign for exposing the deletion of ballot images – a violation of Federal Law, which demands all records generated during a federal election be preserved for 22 months."  Shiva's lawsuit against the Massachusetts secretary of state continues.

Next Duke claims: "Lead Stories has debunked the claim that voting machines were connected to the internet (they weren't). We've also addressed false claims about the 2020 election and the specific countries mentioned by Flynn. For example, the U.S. Army did not seize vote-count servers in Germany; a purported foreign service officer in Rome did not work with Barack Obama, former Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi and others to rig the 2020 election; and votes from the 2020 election were not stored on servers in Spain."

Dominion is a third generation voting machine system originating in Venezuela that evolved from Diebold which pioneered the ability to steal elections. The Michigan forensic audit revealed a modem inside the Dominion voting machine which is for connection to the internet. Dominion's own manual has several graphic pictorials on how to connect the machine to the internet.

Lindell made no such claim in either of his Absolute documentaries about the army seizing anything nor any claims about a foreign service officer in Rome or anywhere else. Watch the 'Absolute' videos at LindellTV and prove me wrong.

Duke's next statement is equally false: "Lindell's next guest was Douglas Frank, a Ph.D. analytical chemist from Cincinnati, who implausibly claimed that lists of names from the 2010 census were used to create phantom voters in a pattern matching demographic patterns of the population while inflating Biden's tallies. Lead Stories sent him a request for the exact data and formulas he used but we received no reply."

Dr Frank has a combined Physics-Chemistry degree, He made no such claim about being an analytical chemist. He is a specialist in large data analysis and has 3 PHd's overall.  Dr. Frank did not claim any garnering of names from the 2010 census, but merely extracted the 2010 numbers (not names) to show how Dominion machines used  population data as a system reference to enable the votes to be switched without exceeding the total population in a given precinct. Dr. Frank discovered the' key' used by Dominion which involves a scalar multiplier to replicate an earlier historical voting pattern of actual voters.

It took a number of attempts before Frank succeeded in representing the precinct's voting population with a mathematical curve. This would establish the base state of the voting algorithm used by Dominion after which votes could be switched from Trump to Biden easily without risk of exceeding the total number of precinct voters. This was done state wide for each voting precinct. 

I was watching live when Lindell said he asked Alan Duke to contact them and there was no response. However it was announced that Duke was trying to call him later in the presentation likely to interrupt Lindell who wouldn't take the call until he completed the presentation.  As far as I am aware Duke never tried again that evening..

Duke isn't very bright but doggedly continues::" Based on registration and turnout numbers, he claims to be able to "predict" the number of ballots cast and show how fake votes were added. That is like saying you can "predict" someone's age using just their birth year. It's a simple calculation that will be mostly right (but not exactly). And it is not even a prediction since you can only know the turnout numbers after the vote counting is completed."

This is absolute nonsense. Frank was not using age to predict anything just showing how prediction could even be done within a specific age group using different ratios of course. As I recall in Franks' Ohio analysis, all 88 counties had the same Biden to Trump ratio which is a clear indication that it has been manipulated. So, if I've observed the same ratio turning up in 3 or 4 precincts, then I can test an observed ratio (say it's 60/40) for the rest of the state. If that ratio is repeated throughout the state then it's CLEAR evidence of fraud because it is impossible for any states voting precincts to exhibit that same ratio.  Duh!

It's clear from Duke's allegations that he has no understanding of applied mathematics. In the 'Lead Stories' article showing the Antrim Michigan curve reproduced from Lindell's Absolute series some glaring irregularities show up in the Dominion data. First, the total population of Antrim county was just 19,322 but the registered voters listed 24,118 or 125% more than the people who lived there which means you have phantom voters embedded in the database.
The second glaring irregularity is that the predicted ballot curve EXACTLY MATCHES the registered Antrim county voters another physical impossibility. The correlation factor was 0.993 using Dr. Frank's prediction model which can only be true if the machine is using an algorithm to cast votes.

So there you have it a half baked attempt by Duke and lead stories to debunk what is clearly machine manipulation of an election and considering Duke and Lead stories ties to communism it's no surprise that they would deny the election was fraught with fraud..