Hans von Spakovsky: Missing Ballots in Three States Exceed Joe Biden’s Victory Margins

by  Robert Kraychik

A Clark County election worker scans mail-in ballots at the Clark County Election Department on November 7 2020 in North Las Vegas Nevada Joe Biden won Pennsylvania and Nevada and was declared the winner in the presidential race against Donald Trump Photo by Ethan MillerGetty Images

Hans von Spakovsky, manager of the Heritage Foundation’s Election Law Reform Initiative and a senior legal fellow of the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, said president Joe Biden’s margins of victory in Arizona, Nevada, and Wisconsin in the 2020 presidential election were narrower than the states’ respective totals of unaccounted-for ballots.

Biden’s margin of victory in Wisconsin was approximately 20,000 votes despite the number of ballots “missing or undeliverable” in the state amounting to 83,000, von Spakovsky noted.

“Remember the margin of victory in Wisconsin was only 20,000 votes, and that basically 82,000 ballots were either lost or undeliverable or were rejected,” von Spakovsky said on Wednesday’s edition of SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Daily with host Alex Marlow. “That’s four times the margin of victory.”

“Those are the numbers that the Wisconsin Election Commission itself reported to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission,” he added.

Von Spakovsky shared details of “unaccounted-for ballots” from a Daily Signal report

“[The Wisconsin Election Commission] said 6,500 absentee ballots they mailed out were sent back by the postal service as ‘undeliverable’ [and] 3,000 ballots that came back were rejected. They don’t say why, but usually [a ballot is rejected] because, for example, the signature doesn’t match, indicating it may have been a fraudulent ballot,” he remarked.


Arizona Rep. Mark Finchem exposes the National Association of Secretaries of State for plotting to halt forensic audits

(Article by Shane Trejo republished from BigLeaguePolitics.com)


Arizona state representative Mark Finchem is exposing the National Association of Secretaries of State for plotting in a cabal to prevent future forensic audits from taking place throughout the country.

Related: Arizona AG Opens Investigation Into Maricopa County Over Refusal to Comply with Audit

The group of secretaries of state recently convened during their annual summer meeting in Des Moines, Iowa “to create guidelines that would prevent a Maricopa-style forensic audit from ever happening again.”

The group of secretaries of state recently convened during their annual summer meeting in Des Moines, Iowa “to create guidelines that would prevent a Maricopa-style forensic audit from ever happening again.”

The only individual who voted against these sinister recommendations was West Virginia Secretary of State Mac Warner. Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft abstained. Every other active secretary of state present at the meeting voted in favor of the recommendations.

According to Finchem, this shows the depth of the levels of corruption within the electoral system and demonstrate the need for individuals who fully understand the issue of systemic voter fraud to take the reins of power.

Never in the history of the several States, or even in the history of the United States, have the People surrendered their right to fully scrutinize any election. Such scrutiny goes beyond recounts. It is the Legislature, that is the duly elected representatives of the people, who control this aspect of our consent to be governed, not Secretaries of State, who are executive branch office holders, or appointed, un-elected bureaucrats. To prevent any form of audit is not the proper role of the Secretary of State, instead their role is to faithfully execute the laws that Legislature has adopted,” Finchem said in a press release.

“Because of the underlying political questions involving elections, there will always be disagreement on how to handle discrepancies. But nobody can, with a straight face, say that every election is fraud-free. It is the prerogative of a free people to hold their elected representatives accountable for the examination of election results to prove or disprove alleged discrepancies in any electoral contest. How a Legislature chooses to address those discrepancies is its prerogative, attempting to change the perception the polity is little more than manipulation,” he added.


Federal judge rules Dominion voting machines violate Georgia law

by Allen Williams


Federal judge Amy Totenberg ruled that Dominion voting machines violated Georgia law back in Oct 11, 2020 in Curling v. Raffensberger. The court filing is available here.

Garland Favorito of VoterGA, a citizen advocacy group reported progress on their lawsuit on Lindelltv, highlighting a number of Dominion system liabilities, most notably its use of 'QR' codes that prevent reading of the voter's candidate selections violating Georgia law. In addition these 'QR" codes can be hacked.

VoterGa's legal plea in Georgia State court:

Now in a VoterGA press release cites New Evidence Reveals GA Audit Fraud and Massive Errors

Petitioners in a lawsuit organized by VoterGA to inspect Fulton County ballots have added stunning claims in their amended complaint and provided new evidence from public records that show Fulton County’s hand count audit of the November 3rd 2020 election was riddled with massive errors and provable fraud.

GateWay pundit reports: Plaintiffs allege Democracy Suite systems fail to comply with the state’s election code, which provides voting systems must “print an elector verifiable paper ballot” and “produce paper ballots which are marked with the elector’s choices in a format readable by the elector.

The Kemp administration spent over $100 million for the Dominion voting systems in the state back in 2020.

VoterGA, which led a suit against Fulton County for an inspection of 2020 election ballots, asked the Fulton County Superior Court to declare the state’s use of Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5 Ballot Marking Device voting systems a violation of state elections law and to enjoin the officials from administrating future elections with those devices.



UPDATE: Mesa County Colorado Forensic Image of Dominion Machine Reveals Election Files Were illegally Deleted

by Allen Williams


Some real fallout from Secretary of state Jena Griswold's raid of the Mesa county Clerk's office headed by Tina Peters. The law requires Griswold and company to provide a list of any items removed during the secretary of state raid on Tina Peter's office during the Aug. 10th incident but her office has nothing from the SOS that I'm aware of.

Griswold claims in a Salon article that Tina Peters leaked voting system passwords to a 'far-right' blog. Really? I thought elections were to be transparent so what other agenda is Griswold advocating?

Jena, I don't think you have any credibility as an elected official when you wait until Peters is en-route to Mike Lindell's Cyber symposium where it was revealed in the late afternoon of the second day that Images of the Mesa county Dominion voting machine had election files deleted. Files that are required to be kept by federal law for 22 months after any election.

UPDATE 8/23/21: Yesterday on Mike Lindell's 6:00 pm report he suggested to Colorado residents that they can request email copies of any correspondence between the Secretary of state and Dominion voting systems (including forensic images of the machines themselves) and proposals such as the 'Trusted Build' under the state's CORA statue (Colorado Open Records Act). Within hours Tina reported back that the Secretary was telling the state's clerks how they could avoid providing this information.

Tina also related that two of her assistants were sent home (placed under administrative leave) pending a criminal investigation. The only way to remove Tina is to charge her with some crime(s) or implicate one of her assistants.  What the hell kind of S.O.S. is this Jena Griswold? Why isn't she being investigated? END Update

The media is all over this, as usual doing damage control and making more of the usual meaningless accusations such as the clerk being a Trump supporter. As If everyone is supposed to believe that is relevant to anything.

In the picture below, Dr.Douglas Frank  reveals deletion of data logs from the County's election machine on the 2nd day of the symposium. Unfortunately, my screen capture photos are not very readable. 

Symposium *Left-side screen display showing Dominion files before the "Trusted Build' update

Symposium *Right-side screen display showing Dominion files after the 'Trusted Build' update. You either have to be a total moron or a 'trusted useful idiot' to believe there is any valid reason for deletion of election software from a voting machine for other than covering up fraud that's already been perpetrated or to thwart a forensic audit.

Original SCR Shot

Improved Screen Shot from a 2nd Lindell Mesa Country Dominion presentation. What to look for..The photo below shows in better detail what the Dominion 'Trusted Build' did. Look on the left side of the Windows image for the directory "Documents and Settings". Then look down about 5 directories until you see "Logs'. Then move down just a few more sub directories until you see a blue highlighted directory. Now everything on the right hand side of the bar are the files contained in this directory before the 'upgrade' Looks like quite a few.  Now move to the right hand side of the same photo where the two log directoris are horizontally aligned. Then observe that the 'Trusted Build' deleted everything but six files in the directory database! This is a violation of federal law.

Same Cyber Symposium screen shot (better detail) showing the Windows based Dominion system 'Trusted Build" upgrade deleting a lot of log files. The number I heard was at least a hundred some of these were from the last three election years. So now we can't know if there was evidence of fraud before Nov. 3, 2020

In the symposium screen shot below Dr. Douglas Frank points out all the files that were deleted in the 'trusted update'

Another interesting slide below from the after 'Trusted build' update by Dominion shows the existence of IPv6 remote log files demonstrating outside or remote access via the internet. Remember in every case where Dominion is asked, they claim their machines are not connected to the Internet.The Cyber experts showed that three years worth of log files were deleted in the 'Trusted update'. WHY?

What's more important. determining whether fair and valid elections are or were held in Colorado or pumping out bullshit about the Clerk releasing passwords that only the secretary of state has? Why has Jena issued a series of emails telling the state's clerks that there are to be NO audits in any of the Colorado counties? Maybe because Jena is afraid of exactly what happened at Lindell's symposium might be confirmed in other counties. Maybe Griswold should talk to Dominion's Mellissa Carone who witnessed real Dominion fraud in Michigan's election and filed an affidavit to that effect.

Why isn't anyone asking the secretary about the plan to implement 'ranked choice' or fractional voting (weighted Gregory method)?  In this method you get some percent of your own vote while somebody else gets the rest of it under social justice or other status themes.  This is a hack attempt to rid the country of one person one vote.to award votes based on social criteria which is UN-American..

Tina still has not received a list of what the S.O.S. took when they raided her office when she wason the way to Mike Lindell's cyber symposium.

The Colorado secretary of state needs to be removed from office.